User talk:Vexilo
Duplicate images uploaded
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:St W X.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:St Wite's Cross.jpg. The copy called Image:St Wite's Cross.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Shropshireflag.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Shropshireflag.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Dorset Flag
[edit]Hi There,
Whilst I think it excellent that you updated the Flag of Dorset page, adding it to English and British flags should not have occurred. The Stephen Coombs flag is not official and has no mandate in Dorset. It was a proposed flag, that didn't even get as far as being nominated - due to the apathy of the Dorset people as shown on the FlagForDorset website.
As you didn't mention the commercially available flag (the three lions and the Fleur de lis), I have added this, along with the history of the debate and resized the images. White43 (talk) 17:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Berkshire_Flag.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Berkshire_Flag.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. OsamaK 08:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Gloucestershire Flag.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Gloucestershire Flag.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Flag of Gloucestershire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Orange Mike | Talk 18:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Flag of Gloucestershire
[edit]I have nominated Flag of Gloucestershire, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Gloucestershire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 17:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Saint Wite's Cross
[edit]Hi, I made an SVG version of the flag you uploaded at Image:Saint Wite's Cross.svg. Could you check it to make sure it's an accurate representation? It seems to me to be a pixel or two off in thickness of the cross. Do you have the exact ratios? Thanks. tiZom(2¢) 22:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for this. Excuse the ignorance but I am unaware of what sort of an image an SVG is - only being familiar with bitmap, jpg and gif. Could you advise please? There are no exact ratios established at present for the Saint Wite's Cross, that I know of and your image appears to work well. However I suggest you contact http://www.white431.adsl24.co.uk/SaintWite.htm the site promoting the flag who may be able to advise further. Regards.
Duplicate images uploaded
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Flag Of Rutland.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Rutland.jpg. The copy called Image:Rutland.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Rutland Commercial.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Rutland Commercial.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Flag of Suffolk
[edit]This is the start of a great article. Well done. -- Secisek (talk) 18:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Gloucestershire.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Gloucestershire.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Suffolk Flag.jpg
[edit]
Hi Vexilo!
We thank you for uploading Image:Suffolk Flag.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:SuffolkSaintEdmunds.jpg missing description details
[edit]
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:St W X.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:St W X.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Image:SuffolksStEdmunds.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SuffolksStEdmunds.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Sussex banner.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Sussex banner.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Somers Cross Flag.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Somers Cross Flag.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Robholeproposal.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Robholeproposal.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:FearSet.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:FearSet.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of White Horse Flag
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, White Horse Flag, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Horse Flag. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 13:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- cross posted from the above AFD
- Vexilo - apologies. You are quite right. Regretfully seasoned editors of Wikipedia become slightly jaded at times and the opportunity for a bit of humour is siezed on - without proper thought. Please don't deel you are being mocked in any way - it's more self mocking than anything else. With regard to the article it fails to of our most exacting criteria - notability and verifability - basically an alternative design for a flag of a county of England that was not accepted is not particularly notable (as opposed to, say, historic designs of the Flag of The Union) and even then we have few reliable sources with which to verify the information being presented. Again, apologies for the puns and sarcasm and please let me extend my welcome to you and see what we can do to help you as a Wikipedian. Pedro : Chat 14:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- also cross posted from the above AFD
- Vexilo, I am sorry that you feel stressed by some of the humour related here. However, the comments were clearly not a personal attack against you or your contribution. Any article that is submitted to AfD is open for dissection, and I can say that many of the comments that are generated in other discussions within this forum can be considered cruel or worse. However, calling people "clowns and jokers" is not exactly a high road comment - please remember that civility is a two-way street. Furthermore, it appears that you have been an editor on Wikipedia since February 2007. I would like to assume that in that period you have been aware of the standards required in putting articles online; your article clearly did not meet these standards, which is why it was nominated for AfD. If you require assistance in further understanding the WP:RS policy, I will be glad to help you there. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Registered County Flag images
[edit]I see you have added a number of county flag articles. They are very interesting. Images of all the county flags registered by the Flag Institute are found in one category on Wikimedia Commons. They all have the same intuitive file names and are all in .png format (as Wikipedia no longer seems to support .gif files very well).
So for example Hertfordshire as FlagOfHertfordshire.PNG:
Commons does not yet have the other regional flags registered, unless under other categories I have not found.
Are you sure about the copyright label you put on the Flag of Wiltshire image (Image:Wiltshire flag.jpg)?
Howard Alexander (talk) 13:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your message. The Wilts flag was added after consultation with its creator Mike Prior and with his blessing, as he was keen for it to appear in the encyclopaedia. I am no wizard with computer graphics packages so if there are better versions of the flag images they should certainly be used. Incidentally if you are interested in county flags you may like to visit [1]
Flag of the Isle of Wight
[edit]The new Registered flag is on WikiMedia commons at:
I have not added an article on it yet though!
Howard Alexander (talk) 17:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- but I have seen to that now, amending the existing Flag of the Isle of Wight article.
Howard Alexander (talk) 17:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes I have seen that and I have added the image to the list of English Flags.
Image copyright problem with File:Wroxton flag.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Wroxton flag.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Petersfield.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Petersfield.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Saint Wite's Cross.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saint Wite's Cross.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gloucestershire banner.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Gloucestershire banner.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Wiltshire Flag.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wiltshire Flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Wiltshire flag.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Wiltshire flag.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 22:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
File:IanWoolleyDesign.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IanWoolleyDesign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
File:SteveCrangdesign.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:SteveCrangdesign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
File:RupBarnes.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:RupBarnes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
File:FearSet2.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:FearSet2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Maceless.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maceless.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Robholeproposal.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robholeproposal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Buckinghamshire Flag.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Buckinghamshire Flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC).
Flag of Huntingdonshire
[edit]The Flag of Huntingdonshire has been registered by the Flag Institute, and now graces the List of British flags and the List of English flags. There is no accompanying article on the flag alone yet though.
Howard Alexander (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:The Severn Cross - Flag of Gloucestershire.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:The Severn Cross - Flag of Gloucestershire.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Wyvern.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wyvern.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Staffs county council.jpg missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2013 (UTC)File:Middx Flag.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Middx Flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:20, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Flag of Suffolk for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of Suffolk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Suffolk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mogism (talk) 21:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Uncited flag articles
[edit]Hi, I see you are an experienced editor with many years of editing behind you. It's therefore somewhat disappointing to see that you are continuing to create articles which are poorly cited or in some cases completely lacking citations. You should not need to be reminded of core policies on verifiability and reliable sources, nor that uncited materials can be removed by anyone at any time, nor indeed that short uncited articles can be merged or deleted. I do hope you will take the time to add suitable sources to all your flag articles. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Vexilo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Somerset Flag.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Somerset Flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Wiltshorseflag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused duplicate of File:Wiltshorseflag.svg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Staffordshire Flag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
The file File:East Anglia flag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded by File:Flag of East Anglia.svg
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
The file File:RutlandCommercial.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Middlesex Flag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Staffs county council.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Somers Flag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:SomersCrossFlag.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
"White horse flag" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect White horse flag. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 24#White horse flag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)