User talk:Verwolff/Archive 1

my first archive

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Xmal Deutschland - Devils.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Xmal Deutschland - Devils.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Myslovitz discography

Just dropping by to let you know I've undone your edit to the Myslovitz discography. Non-free images are not allowed in discography per Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images_2 & Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images. Cheers Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 21:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Verwolff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! giggy _(:O) 11:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Big Cyc - Z partyjnym pozdrowieniem.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Big Cyc - Z partyjnym pozdrowieniem.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Closterkeller - Blue.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Closterkeller - Blue.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Fetisch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fetisch.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:The Car Is on Fire album.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Car Is on Fire album.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Fb templates

Hello Verwolff,

you idea sounds good on the first glimpse, but I wouldn't support it at the moment simply because team naming would be very difficult to handle.

As of now, every team has its own template (to be found in this category) including displayed name, article name, country, abbreviation (not necessarily three letters, but in the most cases) and another parameter I have not understand yet. Naming conventions of these templates are mostly (with historic exceptions) following two rules:

Omit any kind of "FC", "FK", "SK", "AS", "NK" or similar abbreviations for "football club" unless they are needed for distinction
Use the most common English name which is sufficient enough to distinct two clubs (e.g. Dynamo Dresden, Dynamo Kiev, Dinamo Minsk, Dinamo Brest instead of just "Dynamo")

Now, for example, the Serbian club Crvena Zvezda is called "Roter Stern" in German, "Estrella Roja" in Spanish, "Etoile rouge" in French, "Red Star" in English and so on and so forth. Various other clubs have different names in several languages. I can name at least three German clubs which have German common names which differ from the English ones.

Another issue: What are the usual Wikipedia procedures when a club - out of the blue - decides between seasons (or even worse, during the season) to change its name? Exactly, the article is moved to a new name. So as a consequence, we need a new team template as well because we don't want to change ALL the names of this team for all seasons, plus we need to change the article name on every template the team had before. Now if a team has already had like, let's say, twenty name changes, you have twenty different template which only distinct themselves by the common name of the team (and perhaps the abbreviation), which is on the borderline to sillyness and a maintenance nightmare.

The problem might be solved on the first thought if the existing templates are re-written to use the common [[Article name|displayed name]] syntax, but this could (and will, trust me) lead to naming inconsistenices between articles, which results in a maintenance disaster as well. The team templates were introduced to avoid those inconsistencies.

All of the above is applicable to competition and round templates as well.

By the way, I assume that you want to transfer just the standings and the results parts of the template series. There are a lot of other templates in use as well, but those are mainly used in team season articles where they serve the stat-happy community. As of now, if at all, only the temps named "fb r(2) xxxx" and "fb cl(2) xxxx" (and perhaps the "fb match" template) should be exported, and only if the problems which may arise have been thoroughly discussed. I suggest that you take your proposal to the football project discussion page as well in order to get a more broadly input.

Cheers, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 11:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. Kingpin¹³ (talk) 10:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot flag on it.wiki

Hi! I've seen your request for flag on Wikipedia:Bot/Autorizzazioni/Richieste. Last week there was a lack of bureaucrats on our wiki; now we are ready to consider your request. But you should do some 50 edits on our wiki at least, so that we can give a valutation and decide to flag your bot. Thank you! Regards. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 04:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template deletion

You just added {{db|Template that are not employed in any useful fashion and it's substantial duplications of another template}} to several templates. There are two problems with this -- you didn't use the correct template, and you didn't indicate which other templates these are duplicates of. The correct format is {{db-t3|~~~~~|Other template name}}. It would be helpful if you could update these nominations. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Second League 2001-02

Hello, Verwolff. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File source problem with File:Dublin_Bus_Roof_Torn_Off.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dublin_Bus_Roof_Torn_Off.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 23:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot flag on bn

Please get a bot flag on bn: before running your bot again. Please apply at bn:WP:BOT. --Ragib (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Networked Media Tank

A tag has been placed on Networked Media Tank, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chromatikoma (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Frenzy of Exultations

Hello. On behalf of WikiProject Poland, I'd like to thank you for creating this article. In the future, if you add a few inline citations to an article such as this, it may qualify to be on Wikipedia's front page as part of WP:Did you know. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:23, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Frenzy of Exultations, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Networked Media Tank

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Networked Media Tank, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.networkedmediatank.com/wiki/index.php/Products, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Networked Media Tank and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Networked Media Tank, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Networked Media Tank with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Networked Media Tank. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Networked Media Tank saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Yamla (talk) 15:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:OneLegResultFb

Template:OneLegResultFb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 23:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb map

Template:Fb map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Verwolff/Archive 1! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 22:29, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Behemoth - Demigod.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Behemoth - Demigod.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Polish Third Level seasons

Template:Polish Third Level seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alex (talk) 16:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leanna Wellwood

The article Leanna Wellwood has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 10:19, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot on English Wikipedia

A proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Interwiki_Bot_that_are_inactive. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, Magioladitis (talk) 13:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]