User talk:Verbatimusia

Verbatimusia, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Verbatimusia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Shearonink. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jacob Wallenberg, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 02:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sven Hagströmer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You have been adding unreferenced information to the infoboxes of multiple living individuals' Wikipedia articles. Infoboxes are intended to be summaries of the article itself. Please do not add the residence/s of individuals unless you provide a reliable source. Thank you - Shearonink (talk) 02:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Shearonink. Your recent edit to the page List of Swedish Americans appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 02:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cameron11598. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Talk:Olof Gustafsson without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 03:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Trump Organization

Hi there! I noticed that your edit to The Trump Organization did not include a source. Since the edit was in regards to a living person I had to revert you per WP:BLP. Edits that are about living people need to be made with extra care in order to ensure their accuracy. You are more than welcome to redo it. But please add a source. If you need a quick refresher on sourcing please see WP:REFB. In addition, you marked the edit as minor. That edit was not minor per WP:MINOR. Minor edits should be things that do not need to be checked by another editor. Typo fixes, grammatical errors, things like that are minor. The addition or removal of information, no matter now slight, is not minor. If you have any questions about this please let me know. --Majora (talk) 03:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mariah Carey. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Olof K. Gustafsson

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Olof K. Gustafsson, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Potential conflict of interest with Olof K. Gustafsson

Hello, Verbatimusia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam-2727 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olof K. Gustafsson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olof K. Gustafsson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olof K. Gustafsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Verbatimusia. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Verbatimusia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not affiliated with any other accounts.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed via technical evidence, last month. Yamla (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Verbatimusia, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sam-2727 (talk) 03:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Verbatimusia. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 19:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Verbatimusia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM NOT A SOCKPUPPET. I have done hundreds of edits on many personalities since 2012 on Wikipedia including Donald J. Trump, The Trump Organization, Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum ‎ - The Ruler of Dubai, Pablo Escobar, George Jung, Griselda Blanco, Gustavo Gaviria, Roberto Escobar, José Abello Silva , José Gonzalo Rodríguez Gacha, Mariah Carey, Thomas J. Barrack Jr., Russell Simmons, Ronald Burkle, Jermaine Jackson, Agnetha Fältskog of ABBA, Jacob Wallenberg, Eric Trump, Carl-Henric Svanberg, Anders Bagge, Peter Wallenberg Jr., and the Medellin Cartel, Dumbwaiter article, Dubai World article, Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, Faisal H. M. Al-Sabah. My first edits were related to Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem of the UAE in 2012 and further Faisal H. M. Al-Sabah a Kuwaiti Royal Family Member and Al-Diwan Al-Amiri a locale in Kuwait. I am not a sockpuppet and this is a wrongful accusation by an actual sockpuppet that appears to be Daniel D. Reitberg, who is clearly creating accounts to solely remove himself from the Escobar Inc articles. Verbatimusia (talk) 17:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to explain why Mindermind98 and Krimlopio are on the same IP address as you, using the same computer as you, and editing the same pages as you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, sockpuppetry was confirmed via technical evidence. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Verbatimusia/Archive. This is not in doubt and simple denial is insufficient. --Yamla (talk) 17:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, this is a checkuser block which can only be undone by a check user. Please read the pertinent section of the WP:GAB. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 17:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]