User talk:Veracity000

Welcome!

Hello, Veracity000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sadads (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Sadads thank you I have no idea how to reply to anyone on my Talk page but hope this works - all very complicated but I'm grateful for your helping :) Veracity000 (talk) 14:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did a great job -- anytime you link to someone's name they get a notification. There is a new feature rolling out in the next 6 months or so that should make it even easier. Sadads (talk) 15:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sadads - if only there was a dummies guide! Veracity000 (talk) 17:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of people like the WP:Wikipedia Adventure -- but each editor needs to learn a different path. Also, some new tools for new editors coming to English Wikipedia in the next year or two, but it may take some time. Sadads (talk) 20:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: new sandbox (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pahunkat was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Veracity000/new sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Veracity000/new sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pahunkat (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Veracity000/new sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Veracity000/new sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong thank you - I'm trying to figure this out and grateful for everyone's patience. Veracity000 (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eco-Leadership (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not establish that this concept of leadership has received substantial attention from reliable sources.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

This does not mean that the subject of the draft has been found not to be notable. It does mean that this draft, as written, does not establish notability. Notability should be established in the text of the draft, as well as by references.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eco-Leadership and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eco-Leadership, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Robert McClenon thank you for this - going to try and work more on it, taking on board your feedback and add in more of my independent resources Veracity000 (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Veracity000/new sandbox

Hello, Veracity000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Veracity000/new sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eco-Leadership

Hello, Veracity000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eco-Leadership, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]