User talk:Venky2007

Outsource partners International

A tag has been placed on Outsource partners International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bonadea 07:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of OPI

A tag has been placed on OPI, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DarkSaber2k 08:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:OPIlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OPIlogo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles, as you did to OPI (Outsource Partners International). Advertising, and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox", is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mendors 10:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Mmkr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mmkr.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kamal1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kamal1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Mmkr1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mmkr1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan01.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan01.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan01.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan11.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan11.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 18:09, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan01.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan02.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan02.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan03.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan03.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan04.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan04.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan05.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan05.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan06.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan06.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan07.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan07.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan08.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan08.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan09.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan09.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan10.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan10.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan11.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan11.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MS-7.pdf

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MS-7.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MS-8.pdf

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MS-8.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 03:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MS-June.pdf

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MS-June.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:79794329 c5fea1b805.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:79794329 c5fea1b805.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC) --B (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Panchavadi Palam

A tag has been placed on Panchavadi Palam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. asenine ^t/_c\^r (fc: f2abr04) 13:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Panchavadi Palam

A tag has been placed on Panchavadi Palam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. asenine ^t/_c\^r (fc: f2abr04) 16:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Panchavadi Palam

A tag has been placed on Panchavadi Palam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. asenine ^t/_c\^r (fc: f2abr04) 16:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Panchavadi Palam

A tag has been placed on Panchavadi Palam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. SGGH ^speak! 09:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there are no independent verifiable references to establish that the film is notable, or to establish spammy claims like outstanding Satirical movie or hilarious Jimfbleak (talk) 09:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nairsan

The article Nairsan has been speedily deleted under criterion WP:CSD#G4. The article was previously deleted following a deletion debate, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nairsan, and the new incarnation of the article did not address the concerns raised there. To establish an article on the film, you will need to incorporate reliable sources to verify that the film meets the notability guideline for films. Please feel free to create the article when those guidelines can be met, but please do not recreate the article without meeting that threshold, as this is inconsistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of T.K Rajeev Kumar

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article T.K Rajeev Kumar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Beeblbrox (talk) 05:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Img ey ssc entrance.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Img ey ssc entrance.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Kamal's Filmography

Thanks for your contributon for kamal's filmography. The thing is that it is not officially announced. You can add it when it is announced. Xxxsacheinxxx (talk) 11:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Opi logo.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Opi logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC) --Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:InfOPI.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:InfOPI.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC) --Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kottarakulam Ganapathy Temple has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 07:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

Thank you for your note. You have a reply. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mithunam

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mithunam, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithunam. Thank you. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 22:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salim Ghouse

A tag has been placed on Salim Ghouse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 12:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Salim Ghouse. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 13:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Rajini Robot.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rajini Robot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ► 03:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Technopark - Kollam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Technopark - Kollam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. noq (talk) 16:46, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Technopark - Kollam

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Technopark - Kollam, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Technopark - Kollam. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Technopark - Kollam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:57, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV

Hi Venky2007, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported the issue of you removing speedy deletion templates to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:57, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 Hours for Disruptive Editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Venky2007,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Technopark, Kollam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technopark, Kollam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technopark, Kollam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philg88 ^♦talk 13:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Venky2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Closely working with National Investigative Agency on CTI (Cyber Threat Intelligence). Do you want me to pass your profile to Intelligence Bureau / NTRO to observe your rabid interest over this matter for assessing the vulnerability of threat fact on this very important national security issue? Your digital imprints and audit trail is duly observed on Shaheen Bhag. Reply back to me immediately to know a) Why you are so keenly peddling a narrative favoring protesters in cyber space? b) Explain what is vandalism here? c) Can you disclose that you are not linked with ISPR or its allied agencies? Venky2007 11:16 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

On the now multiple grounds of not answering the initial block reason and a de-facto legal threat. Vandalism is explained at the blue link. It is not synonymous with disruptive editing. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Love in Singapore (2009 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love in Singapore (2009 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love in Singapore (2009 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of St. Aloysius Higher Secondary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Aloysius Higher Secondary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Aloysius Higher Secondary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

YogeshWarah^Talk 05:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]