User talk:Velanatti

Welcome!

Hello, Velanatti, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ponni Concessao, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 15:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ponni Concessao

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ponni Concessao, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 15:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Velanatti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have known Mrs.Ponni Concesaao as a celebrated architect of India . It's with my own desire, I wanted to create a wikipedia page for Mrs.Ponni and commemorate her. As a matter of fact, this is the first ever time I have used Wikipedia to create a page for the concerned person . Mistakenly, I created an account under her name itself Ponni Concessao and started to create the page. After the initial deletion done by our administrator , I came to know about the regulations and protocols step by step from Wikipedia.So have created a new one under my name Velanatti and try to recreate the page based on the facts & reliable sources. As a newbie to wikipedia i want to apologize for my mistake & late response. Also kindly restore my blocked account, Thanks Velanatti (talk) 09:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You are either writing about yourself, or you work for Ponni M. Concessao Consultants. For example, you claim to have taken, and to own the copyright for, File:Ponni.jpg, an image that appears on ponniconcessao.com. We aren't interested in having you promote Ponni Concessao. Wikipedia is not the place for this. See WP:NOT. See also, WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO, all of which you have been violating. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocked

Fram (talk · contribs) is a very experienced editor and requested me to restore Ponni Concessao to draft:Ponni Concessao. I have unblocked you. I accept that creating two accounts was the act of an innocent newbie. I accept that you probably own the copyright for File:Ponni.jpg - it is of high resolution and has the EXIF metadata still in place. CoI and paid editing are very strongly deprecated but not actually forbidden. If you do any further edits to the Ponni article you must make appropriate declarations as explained here otherwise I shall re-block you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@RHaworth: Did you consult a CheckUser before undoing this CheckUser block? Pinging Bbb23 as the blocking CU. Katie^talk 14:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KrakatoaKatie: I've already left a note on RHaworth's Talk page, and (unfortunately in my view), Fram has brought this to WP:AN.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see it now. Thanks, and apologies for the ping. Katie^talk 14:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What purpose would that have served? I am satisfied that these two users are the same person. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Velanatti, I don't know if you're following all this, but I want to apologize to you for the confusion on the part of the Wikipedia "administration" for the unblocking and then reblocking that has taken place here. Regardless of whether you remain blocked, you shouldn't be yanked around like this. Briefly, I am a CheckUser. When I blocked you as a sock, I made the block a "checkuser" block. Pursuant to policy, you could only be unblocked with my consent or by another CheckUser. RHaworth is not a CheckUser; when he unblocked you, he violated policy, which is why your block was reinstated.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Velanatti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Mr Bbb23 as i already stated, this is the first ever time I have used Wikipedia to create a page for the concerned person . Mistakenly, I created an account under her name itself Ponni Concessao and started to create the page. After the initial deletion done by our administrator , I came to know about the regulations and protocols step by step from Wikipedia.So have created a new one under my name Velanatti and try to recreate the page based on the facts & reliable sources been published on journals.As to people mention it as a A7 or G11 please highlight me the sentence you feel which breeches the regulation and i will consider editing it. As a newbie to wikipedia i want to apologize for my mistake & late response. Also kindly restore my blocked account, Thanks

Accept reason:

I believe your comments are plausible and that you did not intend to sock in the sense that Wikipedia uses the word. Please work on your draft to bring it up to the standard that Wikipedia expects and submit it through the WP:AFC process. Good luck.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN discussion

I started a discussion at WP:AN#How many things can go wrong in one WP:BITE incident? about edits and actions by you and others. Fram (talk) 13:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Regarding your uploads to Commons. Some pedant is liable to point out that a) the uploader is not Ponni herself and b) that even if the uploader were Ponni, she does not necessarily own the copyright to a picture of herself. To regularise the situation, I suggest you get Ponni to jump through the hoops described here and make it clear that she, or her company, holds the copyright and releases the images under the relevant CC licence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:12, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Velanatti! You created a thread called Ponni Concessao at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murali Karthick (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murali Karthick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Murali Karthick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 09:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Velanatti! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 09:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ponni Concessao (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

Appears to be a violation of WP:AUTOBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ponni Concessao and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ponni Concessao, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Sportzpikachu. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Ponni Concessao, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ―sportzpikachu _{my talkcontribs} 04:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Draft:Ponni Concessao, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ―sportzpikachu _{my talkcontribs} 05:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Murali Karthick

Hello, Velanatti. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murali Karthick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ponni Concessao (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ponni Concessao and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ponni Concessao, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 17:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Despite multiple warnings, you have refused to declare your conflict of interest. As such, I have blocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 17:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]