User talk:Vegan4theAnimals

Welcome!

Hi Vegan4theAnimals! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --LordPeterII (talk) 08:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Vegan4theAnimals. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vegan4theAnimals: You should review this essay: Wikipedia:Paid editing (essay). Grorp (talk) 04:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by つがる was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 21:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vegan4theAnimals! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 21:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I cut the history of the farm before T bought it. David notMD (talk) 01:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Thank you, David not MD, NOW I get it. I was thinking that was factual, and it was, but I see it was more about the land than the Sanctuary and thus, could be seen as advertising. I appreciate your changes. Can I ask your opinion one more time? I went to the Gentle Barn's site and, based on their format, added sections for "external links" and "See also" on Tamerlaine's article. I also added more on what the sanctuary is doing NOW, since your changes made me realize I hadn't really mentioned that (and I noticed other animal sanctuary sites do the same). Do you think these changes are acceptable, or do they revert it back to sounding too marketing-y? Here is the Gentle Barn's page for ease of reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gentle_Barn Thank you again for any help you have. I appreciate it! Vegan4theAnimals (talk) 12:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other articles exist is considered a weak argument, as there are hundreds of thousands of the six million articles that do not meet Wikipedia's current standards. Drafts are rarely Declined because of External links or See also. What is essential is citing published content written about T by people who have no connection to T. T (you) describing what T does and citing T does not contribute to notability. Best wishes from an omnivore who has vegetarians, but not vegans, in extended family. David notMD (talk) 12:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll need them! I'm the only vegan in my whole family-ha! I appreciate you. :) Vegan4theAnimals (talk) 12:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve has been accepted

Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your hard work, Theroadislong! Thrilled to be a part of the team. Vegan4theAnimals (talk) 17:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Vegan4theAnimals[reply]

Hi, Group. I've made significant changes to improve references and added external sources that I hope are okay. As always, happy to learn if this isn't enough. I'm going to delete the proposed deletion as it says to do so this can be revisited. Thanks! Vegan4theAnimals (talk) 03:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That should say Grorp. Darn autocorrect! Vegan4theAnimals (talk) 03:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamerlaine Sanctuary and Preserve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grorp (talk) 08:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]