User talk:Vedum

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Vedum! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 21:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Nice cookies.--Vedum (talk) 21:42, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Administrative division of denmark in medieval times.jpg

I noticed you moved the image of historical division of Denmark from Scania to Skåneland. Wouldn't it be better to fully remove the image? As far as I am concerned it would be a very good image in an (hypothetical) article on Historical divisions of Denmark (particularly Jutland, considering the colorization of the map), but it is not particularly useful in the article on Skåneland, nor the article of Scania. I suggest we remove the image completely, unless you have objections. Dylansmrjones (talk) 14:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is O.K. with me. I just moved it because Scania province was just a very little bit of the map, but Skåneland was a bit more of it. But of course the best thing is to write the article you propose. Perhaps you, as a Dane, would be better suited for the writing. But I do not object a removing. --Vedum (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll leave it in for now (at least for some hours), while looking closer into divisions of Denmark through the ages. I could cover medieval administrative divisions and move forward to the introduction of counties (Amter) and the reforms in the 20th and 21th century (replacing Amter/Amtskommuner with Regioner). Anyway, back to The Two Towers on 3+ ;) Dylansmrjones (talk) 21:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good ninght and have a nice Easter. --Vedum (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jamen, også god påske til dig ;) - I have removed the image since the other maps used are much better. Dylansmrjones (talk) 12:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Scania

Do not edit further today. We have both edited three times today. It is important that we stop it here and ask for a non-Scandinavian mediator. Dylansmrjones (talk) 18:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm TempName1. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Skåneland Football Federation, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, TempName1 (talk) 08:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

#ashtag show

There's a show where Lisa Tellbe appears. and i'd like to know where i can find the video? Steve92341 (talk) 18:10, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bornholmsk dialect

Please don't edit war. That is what the references say. If you don't like it, take it to the talk page and present your evidence. Otherwise you run the risk of being blocked for disrupting Wikipedia. — kwami (talk) 07:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are also other references.http://dialekt.ku.dk/dialekter/hvor_mange_danske_dialekter/, I will put this on the talk page. But I do not like "threats". You may be blocked as well. --Vedum (talk) 07:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cut the bullshit

You know full well that your claim is bullshit. Ethnologue never rejected the figure that you keep saying they rejected. This has been explained to you several times. If you want to challenge whether they are a reliable source, start a discussion on that topic. — kwami (talk) 21:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vedum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]