Jump to content

User talk:Steve92341

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Steve92341, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 20:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Re: French presidential inauguration

[edit]

I've resubmitted the images and adding an uncategorised template. Consider translating the categories from French Wikipedia to English. Unfortunately, I am not fluent with French to help you expand the article. SwisterTwister talk 21:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve. Just wanted to let you know that I noticed your French presidential inauguration article and have started doing some work on it. I'm fluent in both English and French, so will try to sort out some of what got lost in translation. —JmaJeremyTALKCONTRIBS 07:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

saved book template

[edit]

See progress at User talk:Andrewa#saved book template but no resolution yet AFAIK. Andrewa (talk) 19:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Presidential Flag of Sri-Lanka.gif

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Presidential Flag of Sri-Lanka.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 03:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Medal Of Honor GA Review

[edit]

Hi! Just to let you know, your article is still on hold pending further improvements. I've just got a few questions on the review page and was wondering if you could answer them as you are the nominator? Thanks! Retrolord (talk) 10:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Also, please note that there is no such entity as the "Royal Australian Army" - its name is Australian Army. Pdfpdf (talk) 06:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sergeant Royal Australian Army .jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sergeant Royal Australian Army .jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:LieutenantGeneral Royal Australian Army.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LieutenantGeneral Royal Australian Army.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ranks in the Australian Defence Force

[edit]

Hi Steve, This new article you've created duplicates the long-existing Australian Defence Force ranks. Could I suggest that you merge the content across? I've also deleted File:Royal Australian Navy Uniform Ranks.png and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Royal_Australian_Air_Force_Ranks.jpg as you'd taken them from the websites of these services, which (sadly) do not use creative commons licenses as you'd stated. Please take the time to review WP:COPYRIGHT (and especially the WP:COPYOTHERS section of this page) before uploading further files - if you have any questions in relation to this, Wikipedia:Media copyright questions is probably the best place to ask them. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ranks in the Australian Defence Force

[edit]

Hello Steve92341,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ranks in the Australian Defence Force for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Speedy deletion nomination of File:LieutenantGeneral Royal Australian Army.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:LieutenantGeneral Royal Australian Army.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AussieLegend (✉) 12:41, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ranks in the Australian Defence Force

[edit]

Regarding your contested deletion of Ranks in the Australian Defence Force,[1] the article was nominated because it essentially duplicated an already existing article,[2] once all of the copyright violations were removed. When an article on a topic already exists, creating a second article serves very little purpose. (This was especially true with Education in New South Wales, which was a direct copy of New South Wales#Education) It is far better to improve the existing article. Remember though, you cannot simply copy content from another website unless that website includes a copyright notice allowing for that. To do so constitutes a copyright violation. The copyright page at army.gov.au does not allow for you to upload images and text from that website to Wikipedia, which is why the content was removed, and why all of the images that you uploaded were deleted. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio concern

[edit]

Hi, I've gone through some of your edits and removed a lot of content that seems to be lifted from other sources. This is not compatible with Wikipedia, all content you add to wiki must be in your own words and not lifted from another source - even close paraphrasing can be a concern - all content must be freely available (legally freely available under a CC license, not just accessible) for it's addition to Wikipedia. For more info on copyright and how it affects wiki please read; Wikipedia:Copyright violations and Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. It would be of great assistance if you could help with the task of going through and removing content you've added that is licensed in a manor incompatible with Wikipedia. Regards, Liamdavies (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Italian Armed Forces, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Maggiore and Aviere (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brevet de technicien superieur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Letter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Cristin-milioti.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cristin-milioti.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argentine Army, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OTAN, Capitán and Coronel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/French Central Administration concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/French Central Administration, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:President of Sri Lanka's Flag.gif

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Presidential_Flag_of_Sri-Lanka.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. This is Taiwania Formosania speaking (Knock knock) 09:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/French Central Administration

[edit]

Hello Steve92341. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "French Central Administration".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/French Central Administration}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Steve92341. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Steve92341. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Steve92341. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Steve92341/sandbox

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Steve92341. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Steve92341/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Steve92341! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steve92341 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 7ee8e965-58ac-44f4-8275-29ec9ab8fb1e.local. Place any further information here. Steve92341 (talk) 18:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 21:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Steve92341&oldid=1119683044"