User talk:Variety312

Welcome!

Hello, Variety312! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiff's Treats has been accepted

Tiff's Treats, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JSFarman (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tiff's Treats

Your article was well researched and written. I added an image. Feel free to move it in the article or remove it. Regards, Nv8200pa talk 19:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katy Krassner (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources mostly seem to either be about Simon Le Bon or Duran Duran more broadly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katy Krassner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Variety312! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katy Krassner (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not seeing sufficient significant coverage in reliable sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking (per WP:GNG) - the Billboard article is mainly about doll-collecting, it is not significant coverage in relation to her work as a publicist. Subject doesn't appear to meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:CREATIVE criteria. Quite a few of the references are minor or routine/passing mentions (note: forums and news releases are not reliable sources) that mainly relate to her association with Duran Duran but evidence of a working relationship to a notable band is not, in my opinion, a valid reason to keep an article about the band's publicist (WP:INHERIT).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katy Krassner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 09:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katy Krassner (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am not at all persuaded that Krassner passes WP:BIO now, nor that she will in the future. Many people have the mixed fortune to work with significant bands. Few of them are other than people doing their jobs. This makes them WP:ROTM despite being notable to those who love them/ hate them, etc. I once set up a stage for The Scaffold to perform and stepped on Mike McGear's toe. I was notable to him, briefly, for that, otherwise not. I fear Krassner, while not injuring a celeb, shares my fate. I will remain a Wikipedia nonentity because I am not notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katy Krassner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree and hope you will now immediately move to delete the articles about both Tree Paine and Derek Taylor, both of whom do not meet your very narrow definition of Wikipedia:Notability (people) Variety312 (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have given you information below on the tools you will need should you choose to request the deletion of any article here. Please use them wisely and nominate these for deletion should you see fit. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating articles for deletion

All the information you need is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The process may be automated by use of Twinkle, which you may be using already. When you feel that an article ought not to remain you are able to nominate it.

A further route is by making use of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, again Twinkle is your friend here.

The third route is Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, again made easy with Twinkle.

Obviously your nominations need to be policy based. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]