User talk:Vandeep243

This is Vandeep243's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guroudev Bhalla (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guroudev Bhalla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vandeep243! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @DoubleGrazing This is my first edit. So please help me to improve the draft and resubmit again. That will be very helpful. Thanks Vandeep243 (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have to demonstrate that the subject is notable, by meeting either the WP:GNG or WP:FILMMAKER notability standard. You also have to support everything with reliable published sources.

How did you happen to choose this subject for your first edit? And how did you come across this draft? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DoubleGrazing I was reading a draft Udaan a television series 2014 there I saw his name and started searching for him. Hence got the draft. Also I have read the suggestions you given and went again through the draft where I found that there are only 4 citations in the draft and all are relevant to the subject. Please let me know further. Vandeep243 (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And after reading more than 10 pages of several films and TV, I noticed that he's redirected on many pages. So I thought there must be a page for him. Vandeep243 (talk) 16:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does "only 4 citations in the draft and all are relevant to the subject" mean, and how does that relate to what I said about notability and referencing? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking extensively about the draft. It was declined with reason `they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent. Now you tell me that 4 citations aren't reliable and independent? Vandeep243 (talk) 19:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis:

Source 1 is just a filmography, and provides no coverage whatsoever, let alone significant.
Source 2 fails, returning 404.
Source 3 makes a single passing mention of Bhalla, again far from significant coverage.
Source 4 is about a film, and only mentions Bhalla's name once.

None of these sources meets the requirements for WP:GNG notability, and I don't see anything in the career details that would suggest WP:FILMMAKER notability either.

Hope this helps, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Just generally asking. Can you provide references by a simple search. Or should I end this topic here itself? Vandeep243 (talk) 13:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you can help I'll be glad to learn from you. Vandeep243 (talk) 13:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "provide references by a simple search" – something like this?

https://www.google.com/search?q=oscars+2024+date&sca_esv=582289591&ei=aoFTZYy2Jc6S8gLbw4DYAw&ved=0ahUKEwiMk_SL18OCAxVOiVwKHdshADsQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=oscars+2024+date

If that's what you mean, then no, that would not be a valid reference, as the results are different each time, and vary from location to location and user to user. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean google search. You can help me by providing references for the draft Guroudev Bhalla. Because you have great understanding for the same. And if not then lets leave this topic. Vandeep243 (talk) 17:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mohit235 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohit235. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 10:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Vandeep243 (talk) 11:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]