User talk:Valerianna

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Valerianna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done nothing wrong to deserve being blocked indefinitely. Everyone is so eager to throw wikipedia rules and regulations in my face but in the end it all breaks down to one thing - Muslims being offended. The first warning I received from User:TParis00ap on being blocked was well understood. Sadly, I never had any chance to get familiar with the wikipedia policy as I was blocked in 4 minutes as you can see. Seems like a very disproportionate response. Valerianna (talk) 03:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Yes, we generally tend to block people indefinitely when it appears all they're interested in is using Wikipedia as a platform for hate speech and trolling. Aside from the fact that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for anyone's proselytization, I don't think this is how Jesus would have done it. Have a nice day, but if you do continue to post unblock requests like this you can expect to lose access to your talk page as well. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Islam in Russia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Peaceworld111 (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just tried to bring Jesus to these pages. After all, the countries I have edited have always been Christian and not noting that would be so unfortunate.--Valerianna (talk) 02:23, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Western Asia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. My76 Strat 03:30, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Bring[ing] Jesus to these pages" is a point of view edit and strongly discouraged. Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia.--v/r - T P 03:31, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seek mercy dear friend, while it is not too late. If you come back to Christ, we shall rejoice and say: our brother was dead, and is alive again. He was lost, and is found. Luke 15:32. --Valerianna (talk) 03:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm a strong protestant. Doesn't change the fact that Wikipedia is neutral. If you continue to vandalize pages, you may be blocked from editing.--v/r - T P 03:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The likelihood of that would be much less if I was a Muslim would not it? Everyone is wary of them because they might end up tracing your account and killing you. Wont be the first time.--Valerianna (talk) 03:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Step hen 03:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]