User talk:Valeria.depaiva

Welcome!

Hello, Valeria.depaiva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Cronholm¹⁴⁴ 03:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Looking at your contribs, you might want to consider joining WP:WPM. Cheers--Cronholm¹⁴⁴ 03:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks For The Welcome!--Cronholm¹⁴⁴ and a question?

Thanks for the welcome, very sweet. I find it difficult to uncover wikipedia conventions and usages. So a question: I created my account as I found it annoying that one could read in wikipedia about a William Craig (politician) and a William Craig (theologian) but not about the logician, even if his Interpolation Theorem was all over the logic pages. So I created a page for Bill Craig, but I worry that he might prefer to be called a philosopher, not a logician. Is there a way of having him be just William Craig Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, etc, without calling him William Craig (logician)?Valeria.depaiva 06:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Not really, you will have to pick one or the other, This usually wouldn't be a problem, but since William Craig is such a common name, disambiguation is required. If you know his middle name I could make the necessary adjustments to avoid the logic vs. philosophy characterization.--Cronholm¹⁴⁴ 15:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks -Valeria.depaiva 16:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC). I think I may have his middle name in a CV sitting somewhere in the office. meanwhile could you please get the umlauts in Gödel's name to work for me? I did find the reference card, but the font is too small and either my pdf reader is too old or my new add-on from firefox for pdfs is screwing things up, I cannot read the reference card properly.

Ronald Kaplan

Hmm... I think, most of what I disliked about the article has now been changed (I also wikified it to some extend). Looking at it now, it seems to be a short but informative article. I can't say anything about Kaplan's notability, though, as I don't know him. And to be honest, I currently don't really see where he might be "important" enought to deserve an article. If he gets put up for deletion, I would neither vote for nor against him. — N-true 18:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Natural deduction

Hi. I think that you're Italian. Sei sicura di quello che hai scritto nella voce dell'intestazione? Are you shore of the text that you written in the section's title? Grazie, MOJSKA 666 (msg) 14:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the answer. All good. Bye, MOJSKA 666 (msg) 15:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of William w tait

I have nominated William w tait, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William w tait. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Roleplayer (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Annie Zaenen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Annie Zaenen, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://web.mit.edu/lsa2005/people/bios/zaenen.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Annie Zaenen

A tag has been placed on Annie Zaenen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BradV 04:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Re William W. Tait

Hi, thank you for your message. As it was pointed out in the afd for this article that this individual is notable and references were provided to that effect, I am no longer of the same opinion as I was when I left you that message. -- role^player 09:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Valeria.depaiva. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Non-dropframe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Valeria.depaiva/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Non-Dropframe _talk 14:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Valeria.depaiva, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Non-Dropframe talk 14:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Valeria.depaiva/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:59, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Valeria.depaiva, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:59, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Marilyn Walker concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marilyn Walker, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marilyn Walker

Hello, Valeria.depaiva. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Marilyn Walker".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayda Ignez Arruda

Hello Valeria.depaiva,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ayda Ignez Arruda for deletion, because it's not written in English. To request a translation, please visit the translation page. If you'd like to contribute to another Wikipedia, take a look at our full list of language projects.

If you feel that I made a mistake, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marilyn Walker

Hello, Valeria.depaiva. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Marilyn Walker".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marilyn Walker (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marilyn Walker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marilyn Walker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 13:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marilyn Walker has been accepted

Marilyn Walker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 09:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)