User talk:Valentina Biciuc

Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. One or more of your recent page creations, such as Draft:Wolfpack Digital, give me the impression that you are receiving payment in return for editing Wikipedia, and/or work for the person or organisation that the page is about. Note that according to the Wikipedia Terms of Use, paid editors must disclose their connections. Before making any more edits, please reply to this message and state whether or not you are being paid, and place the template {{ping|Passengerpigeon}} in your message so that I am alerted. Do not be worried about disclosing your connections; paid editing with disclosure is allowed on Wikipedia as long as you follow all of the relevant policies and guidelines and maintain a neutral point of view. If you have questions, you may contact me on my talk page. Thanks! Passenger pigeon (talk) 09:29, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Passengerpigeon: Hi! I confirm that I have read the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and wrote the Wolfpack Digital draft considering all the rules of writing unbiased content. I work for Wolfpack Digital, therefore I am getting paid to create a WikiPedia Page for the company.

Thank you for your reply. I have posted the paid contributor disclosure message on your userpage. Please note that although the page you have created isn't blatant spam, it still has issues with promotional tone - Wikipedia shouldn't be viewed as a channel for business promotion, even in a subtle manner, and articles need to be written in an entirely neutral encyclopedic tone, including coverage of negative information such as corporate controversies (if any exist), to be accepted. Also, please note that links to external websites don't belong in the body of the article. Look at one of our many pages on software companies to get an idea of what encyclopedic writing looks like. Thank you, Passenger pigeon (talk) 13:07, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolfpack Digital (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

All inline links must be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links

The tone is pure advertorial. We require 'dull but worthy'.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wolfpack Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wolfpack Digital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 18:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Valentina Biciuc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 18:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wolfpack Digital

Hello, Valentina Biciuc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wolfpack Digital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]