Jump to content

User talk:VCannella3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benezet House has been accepted

[edit]
Benezet House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I plan on continuing to add articles for the historic structures of Penn Center as long as they are approved. VCannella3 (talk) 13:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, and please do. Per WP:GEOFEAT, anything on an official register of historic buildings is presumed notable, which makes such drafts relatively easier to accept (assuming of course there is evidence of that status). Anything else would most likely need to satisfy the general notability standard WP:GNG. Happy editing! :) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gantt Cottage (April 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The NHRP listing is for Penn Center (Saint Helena Island, South Carolina) rather than Gantt Cottage and the cottage is already covered in that article, though you are welcome to expand it. In order for Gantt Cottage to warrant a stand-alone article, need in-depth coverage about specifically about it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, VCannella3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi VCannella3, I am double checking my decline given another editor accepted a similar article above. I pinged you to the discussion but it's as User talk:DoubleGrazing#Benezet House. Feel free to join. S0091 (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, VCannella3!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 19:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Retreat House and Dock has been accepted

[edit]
Retreat House and Dock, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gantt Cottage has been accepted

[edit]
Gantt Cottage, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given another reviewer accepted another building, I resubmitted this draft on your behalf to accept it. S0091 (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hastings Gantt

[edit]

I noticed the red link in Gantt Cottage so did some digging and found these sources you can use if you are inclined to create an article about him. Given Gantt was in the SC Legislature, he meets WP:NPOL so an easy pass. [1][2][3][4][5]

References

  1. ^ Holt, Thomas (1979). Black Over White: Negro Political Leadership in South Carolina During Reconstruction. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-00775-0.
  2. ^ Tindall, George Brown (2021-12-16). South Carolina Negroes, 1877-1900. Univ of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-64336-300-4.
  3. ^ Burton, Orville Vernon; Cross, Wilbur (2014). Penn Center: A History Preserved. University of Georgia Press. ISBN 978-0-8203-2602-3.
  4. ^ Ochiai, Akiko (2004-03-30). Harvesting Freedom: African American Agrarianism in Civil War Era South Carolina. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-0-275-97935-5.
  5. ^ "The South and the Negro". Palladium-Item. 1907-10-06. p. 4. Retrieved 2024-04-12.

S0091 (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orchard Cottage (April 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
One source is a malformed link (perhaps appropriately archived somewhere). The other sources don't seem to address the structure described in the draft. If there is a NRHP entry for this structure, I will approve. Ping me on my talk page once fixes are undertaken.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 17:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Pbritti see User talk:DoubleGrazing#Benezet House. It sounds like we have similar concerns but neither DG or I knew what's the "norm" so I defaulted to accept. S0091 (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thanks for the heads up, @S0091: I'll reply there in a bit but I think that specific structure was probably individually notable enough. The other buildings might be worth merging to that article based on proximity of space and subject, but I'll dig deeper. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I worry about confusing this new editor who clearly is here in WP:AGF and unfortunately WP:WikiProject NRHP doesn't appear to be active. Yes, please do join the discussion after you have done digging. And apologies VCannella3. You have not done anything wrong and ask you bear with us. S0091 (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree. VCannella3, this is a bureaucratic issue between other editors trying to do due diligence regarding some Wikipedia policy and does not reflect poorly on your contributions. Thank you for creating these drafts—we hope to have the matter sorted ASAP. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please let me know what link appears to be malformed, as I would like to fix it. Here is the South Carolina's archive showing the national register of places, specifically within the Penn center Campus. http://www.nationalregister.sc.gov/beaufort/S10817707020/
Please let me know if this is helpful. I do agree that some of the buidings do not have much information, I actually have been working from the buildings with less information first and further drafts will be more complete, but I agree that perhaps combining some pages might be useful, but I'm not sure if they should be on the main Penn center page as that might too much information at once, please let me know your thoughts on how to approach that. Thank you VCannella3 (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will get back to you on this sometime over the next couple days. Apologies if I neglect this task, and please ping me on my talk page should Wednesday arrive and you don't see any further comment from me! ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pbritti and VCannella3 what do think about a separate list article, similar to List of Washington & Jefferson College buildings? Of course that is a WP:Featured list; the one for Penn Center certainly does not need to be as extensive. Like that example, some buildings will have a stand-alone article some will not. VCannella3, see Washington & Jefferson College#Campus for how it is handled in the main article, which is to add a WP:hatnote to direct the reader to the list. S0091 (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@S0091: Exceptional proposal. If VCannella3 feels it does the subjects justice, then I think we have a solution. I'd love to contribute to this however I can, as I have some decent experience on NRHP articles. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that is indeed a very good reference. I will adjust my edits accordingly. VCannella3 (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Sometimes my brain works lol. Also note WP:redirects to the list can be created for the buildings that do not a stand-alone article so anyone searching for a particular building will be directed to the list. In fact, any of the drafts you have already created can be turned into a redirect so the history/work is not lost. I think Google picks up redirects as well (at least sometimes) so the list article might show up if someone Google searches for a building (ex. Orchard Cottage). Redirects can also be turned into articles later. For any that do have a stand-alone article, a link to the list should be added in a 'See also' section. S0091 (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks all, very glad that a satisfactory solution was found! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Cannery (Penn Center) (April 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See my comment for Draft:Orchard Cottage. Consider merging the drafts as these appear to comprise the same historic district and may not be individually notable structures.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello VCannella3! Your additions to Draft:The Cannery (Penn Center) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please let me know what portion of the page has copyrighted information, I've been working with the Penn center as part of a academic project to improve their public facing material and so I am trying to take this very seriously. I would like to amend any issues, but please let me know what they are. VCannella3 (talk) 14:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at Diannaa's edit summary [1], it appears material was copied or too closely paraphrased from http://npshistory.com/publications/reer/penn-center-walking-tour.pdf.
Also, please read WP:COI and clarify your relationship with Penn Center. S0091 (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, VCannella3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

I asked about this above but you did not respond to my query. Having a COI does not preclude you from submitting drafts but you do need to make the appropriate declaration and follow the guidelines. S0091 (talk) 16:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies If I missed any earlier questions you might have asked about this as I did not receive a notification. I am not employed by the Penn Center in any capacity. I am merely a student in architecture trying to improve the public facing material of the Penn center as I am interested in the history and architecture of their campus. I visited the Penn Center as part of one of my classes, but we are in no capacity working for the Penn Center. I accidently mis-represented what the situation was and and my relationship with Penn Center in my reply Diannaa's comment, I apologize for the confusion. The walking tour available on the NPS archive is a version of their walking tour no longer in print, and the Penn center no longer uses so it is no longer copyrighted material. I will go ahead and make appropriate edits to the descriptions so that they are not so closely paraphrasing the material. Apologies, I am a new editer to Wikipedia so I am learning as I go. VCannella3 (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification but I am going to press you because you have used the term "working with" in relation to Penn Center and here Lutyens Trust. It's clear you do have an affiliation with Lutyens Trust given you are working on their website. Also please clarify what you mean by we are in no capacity working for the Penn Center. Is "we" the class? If so, I just want to make sure this account is not being shared (see WP:NOSHARING). To be clear, outside of the copyright violations, you have done nothing wrong in your editing or asking for permission to use a photo (in fact, that's great!). However, while you should not reveal any personal identifying information, I want to make sure everything is on the up-and-up/transparent.
As for the walking tour document, it not being used anymore has no bearing on copyright. Do read through that link I provided and you might also find WP:public domain helpful. Copyright is legal matter with implications for both Wikipedia and the person who adds the material. It's also complex so unless it is explicitly clear what the status is, the default is to assume it is not compatible with CC-BY-SA or in the public domain. If you rewrite the content using your own words, that should rectify it either way. Once you are done, let me know as the previous versions with the copyrighted material will need to WP:revision deleted. S0091 (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am working with the Lutyens trust, but I have not been or am ever planning on making Wikipedia articles for them I was simply contacting another editor who had taken a picture of one of his buildings to ask for permission to host his image on the Lutyens Trust gazetteer website. I am not working for the Penn Center in any capacity, I incorrectly represented myself in that comment as an accident. My account is not being shared, I am the only one making edit with it. As for the clarification on "we (me and my class)", I only meant that since I went to the Penn Center with my class as a school sanctioned visit (think like a class trip to see a museum), I wanted to make sure that there was no misunderstanding that my class (and me as I am a part of this class) was working for the Penn center because we are not. I apologize for any confusion there, English is not a strength of mine.
I am glad that I have done nothing wrong in my part as working for the Lutyens Trust, and I try to be as transparent as possible without revealing personal information which is probably why I am having trouble clearly describing that my class (and most importantly me) are not working for the Penn center.
Thank you for clarifying, copyright information is not a matter I am most knowledgeable about thought I am trying my best. I have already begun re-writing the entirety of the page so that it does not paraphrase (or copy) too closely the walking document. Please let me know if you would like me to make any more edits after that. VCannella3 (talk) 18:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have explained everything perfectly thus my COI concerns are resolved. Thank you! As far as the copyright issue, the tool is still showing the article is 58% match. Can you see the results here? That is for the entire article so I think you have some more work to do with writing it in your own words. It will still show a match because basic facts will still be picked up (i.e.Cedar Cottage was built in 1907) but you want to get it down to more like 25%. The other issue is only the WP:lead is sourced. The best way to rectify both is to find additional sources which will help you not only source the article but also help prevent copyright violations by summarizing multiple sources. @Pbritti: maybe you can help here. It's tough because a lot of it is basic facts. S0091 (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I will try to get it down more, I do see the percentage result that you shared. I only had the WP:Lead link to the sources as those five sources cover the entire page and if I copied them for each section it would double them in the references tab. Is there a way to spread them out without having them double? VCannella3 (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Does the percentage via the link you shared update on its own, or is there a way for me to manually recheck it? I was hoping to see what effect (Hopefully) my recent edits had on the percentage. I added some more summary information from the very in-depth penn school papers, but am not sure if that is yet enough for the percentage to be closer to 25% so I was curious where the percentage is now. Thank you. VCannella3 (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does not appear it updates which is unfortunate but an editor who specializes in copyright has reviewed the draft, removed some violations and revision deleted the history. Just be careful going forward. For reusing sources, see WP:ERB#Re-using a reference, again and again. I actually recommend using Visual Editor rather than Source. You can switch between the two in the edit window by clicking on the pencil icon on the top right. For adding sources using VE, see WP:INTREFVE (it's so much easier!). S0091 (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad someone more knowledgeable than I made some edits. I'll try to be more aware and conscientious of such matters going forward in the future or any future drafts. Thank you that sounds very good for editing! Is there anything else that should be done to the draft or should I resubmit for approval? 12.133.68.129 (talk) 16:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of Penn School Historic District Buildings has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Penn School Historic District Buildings. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 17:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Penn School Historic District Buildings (April 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It is unclear which citation support which statement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ToadetteEdit! 08:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I will try and edit the citations so that align more closely with what is being stated and resubmit. I've had issues using the same source more than once and it being doubled in the references section and i wanted to avoid that, but I will try and see if I can work around that. VCannella3 (talk) 14:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Penn School Historic District Buildings (August 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:
Format needs work. It is cumbersome and hard to navigate. See WP:LISTV.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Orchard Cottage

[edit]

Information icon Hello, VCannella3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Orchard Cottage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Cannery (Penn Center)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, VCannella3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Cannery (Penn Center), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Orchard Cottage

[edit]

Hello, VCannella3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Orchard Cottage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Cannery (Penn Center)

[edit]

Hello, VCannella3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Cannery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Penn School Historic District Campus (October 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jannatulbaqi (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VCannella3&oldid=1251502641"