User talk:VAM9997
March 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sonu Ke Titu Ki Sweety, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 03:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to N. T. Rama Rao Jr.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, VAM9997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
- Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- How to add those all-important references
- Simplified style guide
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Adakiko (talk) 03:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
To add something like that, you would need to wp:cite a wp:reliable source that stated the film's genre was misogynist. BTW: You can wp:pipe such a link. Example [[misogyny|misogynist]] compiles to misogynist. (The nowiki stuff is to show the raw code and shouldn't be used other than for examples such as this.) Cheers Adakiko (talk) 03:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Geetha Arts. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Adakiko (talk) 03:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James (2022 film), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: James (2022 film) was changed by VAM9997 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870055 on 2022-03-18T04:15:36+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to RRR (film). Adakiko (talk) 10:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022 - again
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Beast (2022 film). - Arjayay (talk) 19:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
RRR
[edit]Hello, VAM9997. I'm Ab207. Re this edit, the runtime is 181.53 min (rounded to 182) after cuts, and that should be displayed in the infobox. Please don't change it without discussing at the talk page first. Thanks -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ab207 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at RRR (film), you may be blocked from editing. Please don't tamper runtime without discussing at the talk page. DIff: [1] Ab207 (talk) 10:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at RRR (film). Overall critical summary must be sourced; please don't add your personal opinions here Diff:[2] Ab207 (talk) 10:58, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- As informed earlier, please do not make unsourced changes like this -- Ab207 (talk) 11:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.