User talk:V.michael anand

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! - SUN EYE 1 11:00, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Film distributor, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 03:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 01:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi V.michael anand! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Apple Inc. several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Apple Inc., please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. I also must reiterate that replacing a list of industries with "conglomerate" does not fix any typos, despite what your edit summaries claim.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Microsoft, you may be blocked from editing. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ajith Kumar, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Your edit had a misleading edit summary (it was not a fixing a "typo") and it left the article with a broken infobox. Discuss your proposed change on the talk page at Talk:Ajith Kumar.
< br />— Archer1234 (t·c) 11:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Your continued removal of article content with the false edit summary "fixed typo" is disruptive. Please explain in detail why you are removing the content and discuss concerns on the associated article talk pages.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sarojini Naidu without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 13:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You gave a misleading edit summary too - please see previous warnings. Tacyarg (talk) 13:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacyarg I made a mistake please accept my apology V.michael anand (talk) 06:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Vaikom Muhammad Basheer has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Your edits do not appear to be constructive. Please do not remove descriptions of people as activists from the infobox and lead when this is well-supported in the main body of the article. Please do not describe your edit as fixing typos when they are not, and please do not tick the "minor edit" box for edits that affect meaning or content. Tacyarg (talk) 14:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bharathidasan, you may be blocked from editing. Tacyarg (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent unsourced changes, unexplained removal of content with false edit summaries, and a complete lack of communication.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no expiry date for the block; the block can be removed once you address the issues raised.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo I made a mistake please accept my apology V.michael anand (talk) 06:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The process for requesting an unblock are included in my block message above.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]