User talk:Uthbrian

Welcome!

Hello, Uthbrian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 12:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS A slightly delayed welcome, but a welcome nonetheless. Enjoy Wikipedia - it's great fun.

Thanks for the warm welcome! I am still working at getting the hang of the formatting, and learning as I go. Uthbrian 12:58, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cephalosporins

Link left by User:farseer: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6657497&dopt=Abstract

My comment: The above link was the joke article about "cephalomalacia obfuscate", a fictional fourth-generation cephalosporin designed by Bruce Rubin to lampoon the obsfucating nature of medical texts. He discusses it here: 'Clear-ability' and Clarity in Medical Writing

Drugs

Hey, a pharmacist! Great. Have you seen Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs? All our other pharmacists/pharmacologists/etc hang out over there. We have some drug article conventions there as well. JFW | T@lk 12:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind I awarded you a Barnstar for your hard work. You're an asset to Wikipedia. JFW | T@lk 16:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The drug template is a bit of a troublemaker. A lot of drug articles have them, but it is not up to the standard of other infoboxes, which are more flexible. The details are at the WikiProject I mentioned above. We should ask Arcadian (talk · contribs) to design a better box.

We used to have Mykhal (talk · contribs) around a lot, who could draw molecules for us. I've downloaded ISIS 2.5 to take over this laudable task, but I'm having output problems. JFW | T@lk 16:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Uthbrian, great to have a fellow pharmacist joining Wikipedia. I've seen your article clean-ups on my watchlist, and I agree with JFW's sentiments above – good work! -Techelf 15:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ayahuasca/maois

hi! i was curious why you removed ayahuasca from the maoi category. it isn't a pharmeceutical, but it does have mao inhibiting properties- namely in the form of harmaline. It is the combination of the maoi and Dimethyltryptamine that makes up the ayahuasca brew, as DMT is not normally orally active. so i've restored the cat for now. I'm sure you know a heck of a lot more than me about maoi's and whatnot, so i figured i'd drop you a note to see if perhaps i missed something or maybe you just removed the cat rather hastily, an easy thing to do given the nature of ayahuasca and seeing as how you're embarking on a bit of an overhaul of numerous categories here. thanks, and welcome to wikipedia! happy editing. --Heah ^talk 21:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, makes sense. it's your call. in traditional cultures, it is the maoi ingredient, the ayahuasca vine itself, that is revered and called "ayahausca"- the dmt containing plants just considered "helpers". but as banisteriopsis caapi has its own article and the article certainly focuses on the entheogenic/hallucinogenic use of ayahuasca, i don't have any strong feelings on the cat. (it's also on the maoi template- i think it was just recently put on there.) thanks! --Heah ^talk 22:19, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

matter of fact, im' just gonna go ahead and replace "ayahuasca" with harmaline on the maoi template. makes more sense.--Heah ^talk 22:36, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Contraception/Birth control categories

You're welcome! :D --Phroziac _. o º^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 13:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Polarizing Effect?

I don't know what you mean by polarizing effect, but I really attempt to help wikipedia. Maybe my contribs do have some religous overtones, but my edits tend to be firmly grounded based on the research I've done. Since you do happen to be a medical student though would it be possible for you to help validate, if you feel they are, two of my previous contribs to the Health section on the condoms page? One involved talc and silicon which are used on lubricated condoms, both I've been told cause cancer, the other was an edit to the 37 toxins contained within a solitary condom.

The patch, maybe my edits to the patch section were a bit hasty, but I do believe that the religious attitudes section should be readed because not all good Catholics know everything about the Church's belief, especially on this rather new form of birth control. It would also follow the pattern set out by the Condoms page.

I too hope that we can work together to better wikipedia. Chooserr 00:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Condom's Sentence

Your recent contribution to the Condoms Page is alright by me, but there is one fact that I picked up on the Cancer Society link. It's hard to tell if you have HPV and you can live with it for several year, spreading it around, before you discover it (?). I think this should be added if true because someone might think...aww there's no lesion. Chooserr 06:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

I just thought that maybe since the sentence about the cancer society doesn't really fit in the paragraph, would it be possible to add it at the bottom with the other external links? Chooserr 06:39, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with the Silicon, and Talc bits but I wanted to know if Benzene is a Carcinogene and if its usage in condom manufacturing should be noted under health risks. [1] Chooserr 01:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Addition, I added a section on Benzene in condoms with as NPOV tone as I could muster, and added 3 links. I also have a link to a doctor who published a book about cancer and how to prevent it (benezene & condoms were listed) but didn't include it because it is a review thing and it would be deleted as promotion. I also have a few sites that talk about Benzene and Health - they also refere to Talc so I'm not sure you'd be interested in those.

Oh yeah, and I added a section about Condoms and the drug trade under "Other uses for Condoms". LOL. Chooserr 07:05, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I inform you as to what I've done, list many sources, and offer to provide more, and you remove my addition with a useless comment that it is used in producing medication without concern. I'd be concerned if it was used in medication, and obviously the people I linked to are concerned enough to offer alternatives! Chooserr 07:36, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing for Benzene & Condoms but 41 items for "Contraceptive Benzene". Chooserr 08:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chooserr's watch list

Hey, I made it too!

And I was feeling so left-out before...--SarekOfVulcan 06:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't going to add you originally but when I saw you talking about me on some random users page - maybe in an attempt to get me blocked? - I decided it might be for the best. I hope you understand that, Chooserr 07:06, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not a random user, but a WP:AMA member. --SarekOfVulcan 07:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CFD

Hello, Category:Wikipedians interested in wikipedians has been deleted per Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 December 17#Category:Wikipedians interested in wikipedians. You may want to remove it from your userpage. Thanks. Izehar 17:43, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Life extension (sugars)

Hi Uthbrian, I copied the "Life extension (sugars)" discussion to the Life extension discussion page. --Ben Best 07:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

== U.S. Patents == Wow, thanks for showing me how to format links to US Patents on the Hemp page! Zzorse 12:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

flat chain

I may be wasting my time but flat chain has a ring of truth to it so I have asked user:UninvitedCompany to substantiate it. Please give him a few days. -- RHaworth 18:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meta-discussion about venue for discussion about wikifying terms

Hi Ben, I see you've been busy wikifying terms, and just wanted to make a comment. Generally, I only wikify the first instance of a term, so it doesn't appear too cluttered. --Uthbrian (talk) 07:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Uthbrian, Again, I have copied your comments to Talk:Life extension, because the edits made to that page are the topic of discussion. You don't need to put comments concerning anything about the Life extension page on User talk:Benbest because Life extension is on my watchlist, which I usually check more than once daily, and this will also show me any changes that have occurred at Talk:Life extension. --Ben Best 14:35, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikifying Calorie restriction

Thanks for doing that, I think I caused a lot of the problems that needed amendment, I tend to capitalize stuff like Calorie Restriction as if it were a title rather than a strategy. --Tyciol 09:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TAMS

Strange to meet a fellow McConnell Hall alumnus. Class of 90 here. Greetings. --John^DO|^{Speak your mind} I doubt it 08:29, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Explosives and Category:Explosive chemicals

I am curious as to what your reasoning has been for removing some explosives from the Explosives category... There is a lot of redundancy between the two categories, but there are good reasons for both categories to exist. I'm inclined to revert but I wanted to discuss your intent and where you were coming from rather than just do that. Thanks... Georgewilliamherbert 19:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your followup elsewhere; In case you aren't following my talk page, see followups to Category_talk:Explosives Georgewilliamherbert 21:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WSJ Cryonics Reference

"Here's an interesting article on the potential financial benefits of cryonics" [2]

Thanks for the reference. I am knee-deep in the subject, though, so I had already seen the article, commented upon it and discussed it. My comments:

I believe that a society which will be able to reanimate us will be so vastly richer and more technically advanced than anything that we can imagine that attempting to provide for future costs or wealth are a misuse of resources and energy. I believe it is comparable to "Otzi the Iceman" (the frozen mummy from about 3300 BC who was found in the Austrian Alps in 1991) trying to stash-away his copper axe for his benefit upon reanimation -- rather than using it to defend himself or obtain food and shelter.

I believe that most serious problems cryonicists face are (1) ensuring that they are ryopreserved under good conditions with minimal ischemic damage (2) ensuring that cryopreservation technology causes minimal damage and (3) ensuring their cryonics organization is strong enough to survive the social, political, legal, economic and financial challenges that lie ahead. Most cryonicists are NOT preserved under conditions of minimal ischemic damage, including a majority of those who have arranged for standby service (which they don't get, most of the time). I believe that we should expend our resources on dealing with these problems, both personally and co-operatively.

Millionaire cryonicists who try to squirrel away their money to cash in on a "small chance" that cryonics will work are ignoring the fact that a few million dollars spent on cryonics research and on cryonics perfusion technology would make a BIG difference in the chance of cryonics working. In fact, enough money spent on cryonics research and perfusion technolgy could convert a "chance" into a near certainty. They are like "Otzi the Iceman" not using his axe to save his life.

Too many cryonicists assume that their cryopreservation and maintenance is a "done deal" and they focus on their future life -- "counting their chickens before they are hatched." We must put as much emphasis as possible on ensuring that our eggs are in good condition when they are preserved and are preserved well. If cryonics is wishful thinking, doing little to ensure a good preservation and focusing on reanimation is a compounding of wishful thinking upon wishful thinking.

--Ben Best 10:26, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thoughts on ethology/animal behav cat merge

Hi, I put my thoughts on Category talk:Ethology, cheers, Pete.Hurd 05:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ECT

I can't believe I wasted this much time. And on my vacation too. Sigh. Thanks.--John^DO|^{Speak your mind} 18:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the help on the Tourette syndrome page ! Sandy 13:03, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-fatal

Okay, but shouldn't we mention someplace that while the majority of the time it is non-fatal it has the potential to become fatal or occasionally is. I'm not sure how to phrase it, but you might give the people the illusion that it will always pass. Chooserr 02:56, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neural coding

Thank you. I was looking around for some neural coding theories on here and could hardly find a one. Since I had some time I simply decided to write them up. I'm pleased you like them. :) S e miconscious • talk 08:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Song

A while ago you posted something about a song on the reference desk...I think I might have an answer...see zh:倚天屠龍記 --HappyCamper 00:08, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Tetracycline teeth!

That tetracycline thing is quite relavent. My dissertation involves its use as a controller of gene expression but I guess you wouldn't want to do this with children. Is the stain permenant? I mean bones are dynamic and constantly being rebuilt - surely this would also make adults susceptible?

Also, how do you add that '(talk)' bit your signature? It has something to do with the "Raw signature (no auto link; don't use templates or external links in this)" tick box in preferences? --Username132 22:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know of any research linking doxycycline (tetracycline derivative) to tooth discolouration? I can find loads of mentions of it on the internet that aren't backed up, but if I'm to mention this in my dissertation, I need to be able to give a reference.

Sanchez, A. R., R. S. Rogers, 3rd and P. J. Sheridan (2004). "Tetracycline and other tetracycline-derivative staining of the teeth and oral cavity." Int J Dermatol 43(10): 709-15 <<< actually seems to say there is no discolouration by doxycycline but then why does the FDA website say otherwise? Very fustrating... :( --Username132 23:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! My dissertation title is Engineered Zinc Finger Protein Transcription Factors As Tools Of Therapeutic Gene Modulation: A Study Of Their Creation, Investigation And Utilization... I think you're more into pharmacology right? It just happens that there's a tetracycline/doxycycline responsive transcription activator/repressor which can be used to control expression of ZFP-TFs and so give modifiable modulation of gene expression. Thanks again for the help >> --Username132 (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:United States controlled substances law

Big improvement on the category. Thanks for doing that. --Rbraunwa 19:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dopamine agonist

Being a layman, I would like you to verify my edit to an article you edited. Also, is Flupentixol an antagonist or inverse agonist? Regards.

You're correct on the edit on Dopamine agonist-- excellent work! I clarified flupentixol to be an antagonist. Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way. --Uthbrian (talk) 21:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

problems with article on adolescence

I hope this can be used as a temporary replacement for the section on teen sexuality in the adolescence article due to it's easily verifiable and trustworthy nature. (The Centers For Disease Control are pretty reliable in my opinion and many others) Plus it's layout would EASILY allow for inclusion of information on adolescent sexual activity and sexuality in other countries.. oh yes i'm thinking. Could someone come up with some internet sources to show that adolescents have as diverse sexual orientations as adults?, that would be a given and add some more info other then statistics on pregnancy and STD transmission.

I myself KNOW that teenagers (I myself am a teenager, a little over 14) have varied orientations both homo, hetero, and paraphilic, but do ont know of many good studies or surveys to prove this point which aren't under hot debate.

below is my idea of a good temporary replacement, i've also contacted an admin a few days ago to see if they can help out in this matter. Not sure if they'll get back to me though) P.S.S. do you know any admins?, if so could you contact one to help with the article on adolescence and if you can give me any data on leonard sax that would be great.... as no article on him in wikipedia is to be found (if you're studying to be a doctor of pharmacy it would be widely appreciated)

Xiner has also come to be aware of the numerous problems with the adolescence and psychology of adolescence article and I am hoping us three and more people can work to together to fix this. The MAIN person whom i think is injecting these citings from 'sax' is illuminato, who has given me problems in the past and expects me to buy leonard sax's book (i know i sound unreasonable about that but he has ignored my requests to provide online sources of sax's views in order to fill the goal of the dubious leonard sax adolescent sexuality views being EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO PEER REVIEW. (sry. .not sure how to underline so i made it all caps, below is my proposed temporary replacement)

Replacement content at: Talk:Adolescence#ok..._here.27s_my_twenty_bucks..._again_--___--

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Nateland 22:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Request for comments

There is a request for comments on the Robert Latimer page; please see Talk:Robert Latimer#Request for comments. Rosemary Amey 22:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing fisccusion in articles of interest.

Name talk:adolescent sexuality

see the post a totally new and RADICAL idea for fixing this article etc. etc. You've had some experience helping with the article so I thought you'd be able to help out.

Nateland 21:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Hi! I have seen your deletion on the radical induction of ulcerative colitis, dubbing it as fringe. Do you have references? I added the reference myself on that (not in the article, I just found the citation), do you have references to the supposed non-reality of the theory? I will put that back if no good reason can be found. Thanks! Sensei 06:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that consensus has been reached. But then why is that fringe theory being still kept in the ulcerative colitis article, without any journal or conference reference that as fringe? Many doubtful theories are in wikipedia articles, and this is just another one. Should the reference be deleted also from UC? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Senseiwa (talk • contribs) 07:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Seems to me that the autoimmune theory that is mentioned has no evidence to support it whereas the radical induction theory is supported by a lot of cicumstantial evidence. We should either remove all reference to autoimmune as well, since its not supported in the literature, OR allow people to see the evidence for radical induction as well.

Mr Brownstone

Hello, I got your message about where you say you've added the proper citation. I still do not see the connnection, thereby feel the statement is inaccurate. I just got off the phone with a friend, who called unrelated to Wiki, lol. Anyway, I told her of the situation and she's familiar with the song (to get another opinion). Anyway, that's not the issue. I myself read the lyrics and then most of the play, and I do NOT see where the lyrics are "verbatim" in the least. The song seems to be referring to drugs, while the play is about a teacher who is on the kids cases, being unfair, a pedophile, and all kinds of disgusting ramblings. Nothing seems to fit the lyrics of the song Mr. Brownstone.

Please explain how can that sentence you attribute to be accurate when I'm reading the two myself and do not see the connection at all? Could you re-word the sentence and include which lyrics are in the play? I don't see them, nor do I have the time, nor the motivation right now to dissect the two "works". I've tried, and even read them to my friend, she doesn't see the connection either.

I can't keep up. I am concerned, as I'm sure you are too, that Wiki be accurate and that the reader can get from the article all the information without having to look in a number of different places to help understand it. The citations are there to validate (reference) the content, right? Well, in this case I do not believe it does. And I had to "jump through hoops" to see the connection, yet I did not find it. Unless I took your word for your statement, as most readers may do, it is inaccurate as far as I can see. In fact I don't see a connection other than the titles being the same. Plus, the wiki link to Mr Brownstone talks of the singers and writers soes not the list the lyrics at all. How can this be proper citation? Please explain to me how is this verbatim?
I'll help YOU. Here are the lyrics to the song:

I get up around seven

Get outta bed around nine
And I don't worry about nothin' no
'Cause worrin's a waste of my... time

The show usually starts around seven
We go on stage around nine
Get on the bus about eleven
Sippin' a drink and feelin' fine

Chorus:
We been dancin' with Mr. Brownstone
He's been knockin'
He won't leave me alone
No, no ,no, he won't leave me alone
I used ta do a little but a little wouldn't do
So the little got more and more
I just keep tryin' ta get a little better
Said the little better than before
I used ta do a little but a little wouldn't do
So the little got more and more
I just keep tryin' ta get a little better
Said the little better than before

Chorus:

Now I get up around whenever
I used ta get up on time
But that old man he's a real muthafucker
Gonna kick him on down the line

I used ta do a little but a little wouldn't do
So the little got more and more
I just keep tryin' ta get a little better
Said the little better than before
I used ta do a little but a little wouldn't do
So the little got more and more
I just keep tryin' ta get a little better
Said the little better than before

Chorus:
Shoved it in the bindle and I shot it in the middle
And it, it drove outta my mind
I should've known better, said I wish I never met her Said I,

I leave it all behind Yowsa!

Please point out which ones are in the play and where. Thanks Jeeny 03:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I just changed the sentence taking out the verbatim part. This is before I got your message, I'll finish reading it now. Thanks. Jeeny 03:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Ah, just read the link. Is there a way you could re-word the sentence and then add the link you posted on my talk page into the article? That would help a bunch. Thanks! Jeeny 03:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Much better!! Yes, it is accurate. (thumbs up!) Thank you for all the work! Oh, I just took an extra period out. lol ;) Jeeny 03:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Spinosad

Thank you for your edits to the page on spinosad, but placing it in the biological pest control category instead of pesticides is inaccurate. It does not contain any living organism. --Bugguyak 12:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comedown (drugs)

Hi. I'm not entirely sure this article belongs in the 'Addiction' category - I believe being placed in this category misrepresents the topic since you don't have to be addicted to a substance to suffer a 'comedown' from it, no more than you would have to be an alcoholic to suffer a hangover. Darksun 11:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hormonal contraception category

Hi, I wasn't aware that all hormonal contraceptives were considered teratogenic. I've read concerns about progesterone supplementation during pregnancy producing feminization of male fetuses, but this appeared to me to be controversial still. Nothing about teratogenic effects is in any of the hormonal contraception articles - the emergency contraception article even specifically says it is safe for pregnant women should they accidentally take it.

It would be nice to have information about tertogenic effects in at least the major articles COCP and POP and/or Hormonal contraception before adding the entire category to Category: Teratogens. Lyrl^Talk _C 13:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

47th Missouri Volunteer Infantry Speedy Deletion

You've classified the 47th Missouri Volunteer Infantry article as a candidate for speedy deletion based upon copyright infringement. This was brought up some weeks ago by user:Lucasbfr. I will give you the same explanation given to the other admin as to the copyright status. The previous case was cleared immediately.

This was posted on the 47th MO article talkpage until recently. Before shooting for copyright infringement charges, do some checking around, as this is now the second time this has come up.

The information I posted as a stub is originally from Dyer's Compendium of the War of the Rebellion which is free for open and public use. I took my information from http://www.civilwararchive.com/Unreghst/unmoinf4.htm. (thereby showing the public use status of this information, as it is posted on at least four websites as taken from Dyer's) Dyer's Compendium is also catalogued as a public access and use tool by the NPS on their Civil War Soldiers and Sailors System. No copyright infringement was made. The article is a stub for now, but as with every Wikipedia article, it gets continuously worked on, so a crisp and clean presentation was in the works if there had not been premature intervention. Category, notability and other fulfillment of Wikipedia standards is TBA. Why was there no checking done before slapping it with a copyright infringement notice? Auror 21:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment

Thank you for your comment on my RfA, which was successful. Lyrl^Talk _C 00:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week

WikiProject Pharmacology is currently organizing a new Collaboration of the Week program, designed to bring drug and medication related articles up to featured status. We're currently soliciting nominations and/or voting on nominations for the first WP:RxCOTW, to begin on September 5, 2007. Please stop by the Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week page to participate! Thanks! Dr. Cash 17:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week

Aspirin has been selected as this week's Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week! Please help us bring this article up to featured standards during the week. The goal is to nominate this at WP:FAC on September 10, 2007.

Also, please visitWP:RxCOTW to support other articles for the next COTW. Articles that have been nominated thus far include Doxorubicin, Paracetamol (in the lead with 4 support votes so far), Muscle relaxant, Ethanol, and Bufotenin.

In other news:

Bupropion has been promoted to featured status on August 31, 2007.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology main page has been updated and overhauled, to make it easier to find things, as well as to highlight other goals and announcements for the project.

Garrondo is asking for individuals to help review Therapies for multiple sclerosis, as he is considering nominating this article for GA status.

Fvasconcellos notes that discussion is ongoing regarding the current wording of MEDMOS on including dosage information in drug articles. All input is welcome.

Dr. Cash 00:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Update

Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!

Aspirin has just completed its two week run as the first Collaboration of the Week! Many thanks to those editors that contributed; the article got a lot of good work accomplished, and in particular, much work was done in fixing up the history section. It's still not quite "done" yet (is a wikipedia article really ever done?), but after two weeks I think it's more important to push onwards with the development of the new collaboration of the week program. I will be fixing up Aspirin in the next few days and possibly nominating it for either GA or FA status.

Muscle relaxant has been selected as the new Collaboration of the week until October 2, 2007! This article is currently rated as a "stub", so it's got quite a bit of work cut out for collaborators! Admittedly, featured status could be a long way off,... but still attainable! At the least, maybe we could at least get it up to meeting the Good article criteria? Please stop by the article and help improve it.

Resveratrol, having recently achieved GA status on August 16, 2007, is now making a run for featured status. This is quite a fascinating compound. If you can, please stop by its discussion page and leave comments in support of it.

Please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum for discussing or dispensing medical advice amongst users. Specifically, talk pages of articles should only be used to discuss improving the actual article in question. To help alleviate this situation, the template {{talkheader}} may be added to the top of talk pages, reminding users of the purpose of such pages. Additionally, unsigned comments and comments by anonymous users that are inappropriate may be removed from talk pages without being considered vandalism.

There was an interesting article on ZDNet last week about Hewlett Packard licensing its patented microneedle technology used in common inkjet printers to be used in transdermal patches to deliver a time-controlled release of drugs to patients. This information could be added to articles such as route of administration or drug delivery.

You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.

Dr. Cash 04:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Update

Here are a few updates in the realm of WikiProject Pharmacology:

The Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week has been changed to Collaboration of the Month, based on current participation levels. It is also more likely that articles collaborated on for one month are more likely to achieve featured quality than articles worked on for only a week or two.

The current Collaboration of the Month for November is Receptor antagonist. Please take a look at that article and contribute to it if you get a chance. Ideally, the article should adhere to the featured article criteria.

Therapies for multiple sclerosis is currently a featured article candidate. If you are familiar with the featured article criteria, please visit WP:FAC and review the article.

Anabolic steroid is the wikiproject's newest Featured Article, having been promoted on October 8, 2007.

Theobromine was delisted as a Good Article. The Peer review and GA reassessment discussions provide suggestions on improvement. Muscle relaxant was recently reviewed for Good Article status, but not promoted. Please see the full review full review here for details.

Dr. Cash 22:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A fellow Wikimedian needing help

Dear Brian,

I'm Steven Fruitsmaak and I'm contacting you because I was looking for a Wikimedian in Houston, Texas, and I spotted your name in Category:Wikipedians in Houston. I picked you out because I recognised your name from WP:CLINMED and like me, you're a flexitarian .

As an accredited reporter for Wikinews, I'm in the process of arranging an interview with Reggie Bibbs, a guy in Houston who has neurofibromatosis and is running a succesful campaign on that. The problem is, he has agreed to a video interview, but they want to send me a DV cassette... I don't have a digital camera or something to play those cassettes, and I'm currently residing in Newcastle, U.K.

I've asked them to try and connect the camera to a computer and upload or email the file to me, but I was wondering if you would be willing to help me with this if necessary, by sending them your contact details so they can send you a DV cassette or DVD, so you could upload a video file to Commons for Wikinews?

Many thanks,

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million, I'll let you know once they've confirmed to me what they want to do exactly. Cheers, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology task force

Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

-- Addbot (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 12:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is wanted

Please provide your input here on the legitimacy and desirability of accepting external links in relevant Wikipedia articles to MedMerits, a new and freely accessible online resource on neurologic disorders. Presto54 (talk) 03:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Med

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new non-profit organization we're forming at m:WikiMed. Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! Anthonyhcole (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)

Get free access to research!

...Support Open Access...

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 20:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)

Get free access to research!

...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 20:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]