User talk:User110022

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 09:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mean as custard,

We did NOT put any promotional material on Wikipedia, our brand page needed a regular update. The Bakkafrost Wikipedia page is for informative purposes. If you could point out which parts you found "promotional" we would be happy to reconsider rewording.

We would like to officially ask you to stop interfering with our company information and stop us from being transparent about our operations, products and services.

Hope you have a lovely day Mean as custard! User110022 (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 12:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A random example: "With its commitment to renewable energy and sustainable practices, Förka exemplifies Bakkafrost's dedication to environmental stewardship and demonstrates the potential for innovative solutions within the biogas industry." - Does that sound promotional? . . Mean as custard (talk) 12:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mean as custard, I will revert to the updated version of our brand page as I do not classify your given example as promotional. I kindly ask you to send all your concerns to HRcentral at bakkafrost.com and we can take it from there. User110022 (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

==Notice of noticeboard discussion==

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. User110022 (talk) 14:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello User110022. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:User110022. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=User110022|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've placed a corresponding template at Talk:Bakkafrost. Please use that page to post content proposals in the future; you can use the Edit request wizard to do so more easily, if you wish. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User110022! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! I now clarified that I am a Bakkafrost company employee. The updates are necessary for keeping up to date with key company information, and to inform about the extended activities Bakkafrost is involved in since the past update. Therefore, I will revert to the updated version once again. User110022 (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User110022 That is not what you were told to do. I am now going to report you for edit warring and ignoring the instructions you were given. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I might have misunderstood! Could you please explain again what else I should do? User110022 (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User110022 You were told to use the talk page to make edit requests and to stop edit warring. I'll let others take it from here. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I told you at WP:AN to use the {{edit coi}} template for your edit requests on the talk page. Click that template link to see the details for its use. In your edit request, you need to state what you want changed in a "Change X to Z" format, and you must include reliable sources to support each change. Schazjmd (talk) 16:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello User110022! Your additions to Bakkafrost have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Even if permission is verified, that doesn't mean that the text is acceptable. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a mirror of the company's web sites. Promotional text is not acceptable. -- Whpq (talk) 17:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]