User talk:Usaidfarooqui

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.amazonintl.in/forum/index.php?topic=33723.0.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.amazonintl.in/forum/index.php?topic=33723.0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LowLevel73^(talk) 07:55, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Allahabad has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Allahabad was changed by Usaidfarooqui (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873137 on 2014-11-06T08:07:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:07, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Super Mario Man ( talk ) 18:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 08:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaikh muhibbullah allahabadi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajeem95 (talk | bincang (ms) | cont) 08:51, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

Also, do not remove the AfD text or replace it with article text. Not only will this not stop the AfD from commencing, but continuing to do this and removing the AfD banner will run the risk of you receiving another block. If you want to save the article you must provide reliable sources (WP:RS) that can be verified by other editors. Just saying that the person is notable is not enough- you have to WP:PROVEIT. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:36, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help us to help you

Hello. Do you understand that Tokyo Girl and I am trying to save this article from deletion and develop it? Please do not make our efforts more difficult. Try to see the established form and practices here and please read the guidelines of Wikipedia to be able to edit it accordingly. Thanks. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:26, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you see that we write in small letters? --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Shaikh Muhibullah Allahabadi. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Shaikh Muhibullah Allahabadi, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 06:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for 48 hours because you repeatedly removed the AfD template even after being warned several times that you should not do this. I would also like to recommend that rather than making extreme changes to the article for Shaikh Muhibullah Allahabadi, that you propose edits on the article's talk page. The reason for this is that your edits have been written with an extremely non-neutral tone, which implies to me that you are a follower of this man's work and want to write about him in as positive a tone as possible. At this point in the AfD other editors have come forward to help show notability for Shaikh Muhibullah Allahabadi, so right now you're actually doing more harm than good when it comes to editing because at least one editor has seen the edits you made and believed that this man is not notable. In trying to save the article you are actually doing it a great disservice. It's wonderful that you feel this strongly about him, but Wikipedia is not a place to promote something that you like: you have to be neutral in how you write and edit. If you continue to make similar edits (addition of promotional sounding material, reversion of other people's edits) then you run a serious risk of being blocked for longer or even permanently, because it just comes across like you are not paying attention to people's warnings and you are only here to promote the Shaikh. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shah Muqarrab Ullah Muhibbullahi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shah Muqarrab Ullah Muhibbullahi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. McGeddon (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Syed Kabir Qannnauji

The article Syed Kabir Qannnauji has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this person existed, Google results for his name and that of the cited book are all Wikipedia pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk to me 04:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Syed Kabir Qannnauji. You have repeatedly created pages about non-notable figures that have been subject to deletion. Please do not continue creating these pages, as in the past your behavior has resulted in a block and may again in the future. AMLNet49-Talk-Cont 06:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Qazi Ghasi

The article Qazi Ghasi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article rests on a single unidentifiable source. Further has no evidence of meeting Wikipedia:Notability in its eight years since tagging.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 22:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]