User talk:UrosNikol

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Davomme per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Davomme. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 22:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UrosNikol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Tottally diffrent people "Davomme" iš a friend of mine but im not his alt account, this whole thing couldve been avoided if you bothered to check where our ip adresses were registered at or the fact my email is in serbian containing my first and last name, i can provide any extra proof if that means i get unbanned (pictures etc) UrosNikol (talk) 23:07, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't have access to what your email address is. What you describe is called meat puppetry. (talk) 09:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UrosNikol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never pushed a narrative or had supported my friend in any arguments for that matter he wasnt in any, by your definition of meat puppetry I am not one

Decline reason:

After reviewing the case, I came to the conclusion that you were indeed WP:MEATPUPPETing by collaborating with a blocked user on writing a draft article. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Firefly: Let's assume that this is really different person connected to Davomme. But, is there anything WP:ILLEGIT in this person's edits? Vanjagenije (talk) 21:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Vanjagenije - see the deleted edits here. Davomme and GereonGG are Confirmed (so there has already been misuse of multiple accounts here), and then UrosNikol was editing the same sandbox as GereonGG. While there was no technical link to UrosNikol, the editing overlap in a very obscure place (a user sandbox), the obscured technical evidence, and the other misuse of multiple accounts made me confident enough to block. I stand by that, but will of course let you judge the unblock request and not stand in the way of any decision you wish to make :) firefly ( t · c ) 15:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]