User talk:Uriiix

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Dashavatara, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

3RR

You have reached WP:3RR at Dashavatara; one more revert and you'll be blocked. Ping User:Doug Weller at forehand. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's talk only abt. buddha. This is your talk! Blokes block sane users. Uriiix (talk) 06:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's four. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Five, actually. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many on your part. Use talk Uriiix (talk) 06:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six diff. WP:NOTHERE. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Dashavatara) for a period of 6 months for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I blundered on the block settings and have to change it twice. The block is indefinite which puts the onus on Uriiix to explain why they should be unblocked. Johnuniq (talk) 11:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]