User talk:Urbaninformative

January 2014

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Demetrice jackson‎. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 10:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Urbaninformative. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Legoktm (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For some good anti-vandalism work and some helpful tagging of promotional userpages today - have a barnstar! Yunshui 雲‍水 14:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urbaninformative

Hello, Urbaninformative, please can you evaluate the article for future publication?

w:User:RookTorre/sandbox/Density_of_air

This being finalized, thanks for the comments

RookTorre (talk) 13:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Demetrice Nguyen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Demetrice Nguyen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 19:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Urbaninformative/sandbox (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Urbaninformative/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for
your contributions
to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Urbaninformative, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Urbaninformative. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Last Kings Entertainment

Template:Last Kings Entertainment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. STATic message me! 21:06, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]