Jump to content

User talk:AdamFilinovich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:UpperJeans)

First Subject

[edit]

This first subject is the first test of subjects and headlines on this page. It's also the second test of plain text in the last few seconds. UpperJeans (talk) 01:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Important things

[edit]

Hey Uppery, On a scale of scissors to philosophy, what is your favourite colour in the film vaseline — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrisLovesBread (talkcontribs) 17:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

6 UpperJeans (talk) 21:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not copy/paste moves; use appropriate redirect process instead

[edit]

Please do not perform copy/paste moves. Per our user license we must retain authorship and those types of moves break our EULA. Instead, simply request a move. I don't have a problem with renaming New Progressive Party of Puerto Rico to New Progressive Party (Puerto Rico) but copy/paste moves legally endanger Wikipedia. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 16:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

[edit]
hey :333 Upperjeans 69 (talk) 00:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]
File:File-Kitten in a helmet.jpg

not as cute as izzabella!!!

Upperjeans 69 (talk) 00:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UpperJeans (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to discussion

[edit]

I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. AdamFilinovich (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the final vote on the bolding issue

[edit]

Thank you for participating in the bolding issue of the election infobox earlier. We are now holding a final vote in order to reach a clear and final consensus. Please take a moment to review our discussion and vote in Template talk:Infobox election#Final voting. Lmmnhn (talk) 14:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. AdamFilinovich (talk) 19:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green parties in the United Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graph update

[edit]

Any chance you can update the UK opinion poll graph? We're heading to a general election, which suggests more frequent updates are a good idea, and it's been 2 weeks since one of you clever graph editors last updated. Thanks so much. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 11:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm about to pull the chart on the page for Wales - it's not been updated since May and is therefore misleading - if you get the chance to address that too, fantastic. The previous editor, Mélencron seems to have retired, which is a great shame. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 12:06, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Dweller: Given how many errors there were in the chart that I was able to find, I can't in-good-faith make a visual for the national polls. If you'd really like to update it, the spreadsheet I use to make it is still public here. As for Wales, I've gone ahead and made a demo of what it might look like, but because there are so few polls, either a different polling-average method or a longer timespan (28 days is the current afaik) will probably be necessary if we want to have a trendline. You can preview the graph here. I'm welcome to any ideas. Filinovich (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. What are the errors in the chart? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 20:55, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies. I meant to say table. I was referring to the 2019 polls table on the page. Filinovich (talk) 02:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]