User talk:Unsetwens

Welcome!

Speedy deletion nomination of Christon Jones

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christon Jones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christon Jones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christon Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christon Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Slywriter (talk) 16:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Hamilton Zehl

The article Ryan Hamilton Zehl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I believe that this article may not qualify for a Wikipedia article as sources and a quick google search shows Ryan Zehl does not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Yours Faithfully, GA Melbourne ( T | C ) 00:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ryan Hamilton Zehl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Hamilton Zehl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Hamilton Zehl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Yours Faithfully, GA Melbourne ( T | C ) 01:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent promotional editing likely related to WP:UPE.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unsetwens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello User:Ponyo, hope you're doing well and safe! -- I have no clue what this is because I'm not a UPE, i have spent a lot of time preparing the content of the article off-wiki and didn't realize that it will seem like paid editing. Please unblock, i would like to contribute and complete the journey. I would be thankful if you could consider that. ThanksUnsetwens (talk) 23:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I must concur with Ponyo. You don't have to have specific payment for edits to be a paid editor, any paid relationship triggers the disclosure requirement. It might help if you go into detail about how you came to edit about the people that you did, they clearly are not picked at random. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

All of your articles are written as cookie-cutter WP:UPE. This edit makes your association with paid editing particularly evident.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Neither understand what "cookie-cutter" means. I'm not connected to Will Storr as well, just wanted to make the article seem better, i have even added sources to verify my contribs. Honestly, i think there's a mistake -- I want to state that I have never get paid or compensated for my edits here.Unsetwens (talk) 00:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:4MyCiTy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:4MyCiTy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CoconutOctopus talk 05:35, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]