User talk:Unknown4321unknown

Welcome!

Hello, Unknown4321unknown, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 06:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Your recent editing history at List of rampage killers (religious, political or racial crimes) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Primefac (talk) 16:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See User_talk:Orangemike#Possible_sock. I'm worried that this is a sock of User talk:Rampage killer given the near identical editing and causing trouble.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 18:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooting does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 17:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Unknown4321unknown. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Your recent editing history at [[:List of rampage killers (workplace killings)] shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DanStevens (talk) 08:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Um, he was not in an edit war. He was just reverting edits that were specifically against the rules. Elhiggins

What Wikipedia rules are you referring to? DanStevens (talk) 08:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not wikipedia rules, but rules that were made for the article. Elhiggins

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rampage killers (home intruders), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rampage killers (home intruders), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rampage killers (other incidents), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Longhua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rampage killers (familicides), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Le Nouvelliste (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of rampage killers into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Unknown4321unknown. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of rampage killers (familicides in Asia)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of rampage killers (familicides in Asia).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Very interesting list, I just made some basic MOS type edits to the lede. Excellent work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 23:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of rampage killers (familicides in Americas) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rampage killers (familicides in Americas) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rampage killers (familicides in Americas) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kajzerica shooting, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brezovica and Petrovci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shooting categories

Hi, since you aren’t providing edit summaries to your removal of categories on multiple pages, is there a reason you’re doing this that is not just removing content for removing content? Thanks. Starkenborgher (talk) 15:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think he is a bot. Not sure if this is vandalism but it sure does not improve all those articles. 31.161.136.210 (talk) 11:36, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's too much work, I don't have the tools to fix this. 31.161.136.210 (talk) 11:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Orom and Martonoš shootings

added a link pointing to Orom

Podvinje cafe shooting

added a link pointing to Podvinje

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orom and Martonoš shootings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Attacks in the Czech Republic

A tag has been placed on Category:Attacks in the Czech Republic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About List of rampage killers in China#Other incidents

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give List of rampage killers in China#Other incidents a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into List of rampage killers (other incidents in China). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Rastinition (talk) 12:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of rampage killers (other incidents) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rampage killers (other incidents), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rampage killers (other incidents) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jabukovac killings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jabukovac.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pukekohe shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pukekohe shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pukekohe shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 18:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Unknown4321unknown

Thank you for creating Kirkland shootings.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of rampage killers (mass murders committed using grenades) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rampage killers (mass murders committed using grenades) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rampage killers (mass murders committed using grenades) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:43, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of French Revolution and Revolutionary Wars movies

The article List of French Revolution and Revolutionary Wars movies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, very long list with minimal prose/context. No demonstration of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films set during the French Revolution and French Revolutionary Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Pierson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edits, although...

...removing the masterpiece Liberty's Kids ruins the effect (I haven't checked what else was removed). Can you please go back and see if anything else was taken out which should be included, thanks. Aside from this example and missing items the page looks very good, nice work. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films about the American Revolution, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Howard and Frank Montgomery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of War of 1812 films moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of War of 1812 films, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mexican–American War films moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Mexican–American War films, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Texas Revolution films moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Texas Revolution films, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Spanish–American War films moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Spanish–American War films, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Philippine–American War films moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Philippine–American War films, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raurimu massacre

Thank you for writing Raurimu massacre. Anyhow, I think that it's important to check which specific information is attributed to which specific citations. I notice paragraphs with all sources at the end, but we need citations to be inline (specific chunks attributed to their respective sources)

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 16:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of War of 1812 films

Hello, Unknown4321unknown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of War of 1812 films, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.