User talk:Uniwares

Deleted page

03:19, 20 June 2007 Fang Aili (Talk | contribs) deleted "Uniwares" (advertising)

What exactly makes you think this page is/was advertising? And in which sense it is significantly different from pages like Barracuda Networks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uniwares (talk • contribs)

Existence does not merit inclusion. Barracuda Networks might need editing, it might even need deleting. But Uniwares was advertising, and I happened to see it and delete it. Please see this page for details on why this was deleted. Thank you! --Fang Aili ^talk 13:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then probably all of those [1] (among others) need deletion too, according to your definition? Uniwares (talk · contribs)

I really don't know. I don't have time to go through them. You are welcome to nominate them for deletion if you wish. (See Wikipedia:Deletion for details.) You might also be interested in WP:COI, which states that if you have a close connection to the subject, you probably shouldn't be writing about it. Thank you, Fang Aili ^talk 17:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I rather pledge for a undelete then. There are perfectly valid categories for articles about companies, actually dozens of categories and hundreds of company descriptions, which may even sometimes sound like advertising to the unknowing. But I believe that it is perfectly within the goals of Wikipedia to describe an enterprise with its doings without making it an advertising. Thank you very much. Uniwares 01:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Equine infectious anemia

I assume you are referring to the following:

Current situation shows that the EIA mortality is caused by a positive Coggins test and not by the disease itself. No numbers are available of horses actualy dying of acute forms. See also [2]

I was just doing some clean up on a messy article and thought that the statement and external link were pretty biased. Add it back in if you like, but you may want to find a more reliable source. --Joelmills 02:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Context filtering

The article Context filtering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too hard to find sources as a search shows up many other kinds of context filtering.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]