User talk:Unitedbaniya51

March 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bania (caste), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Heba Aisha (talk) 10:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chalo bhai in dono kutto ko sabak sikhayein. Baniyo ka sabak aur heere ke chamak, hamesha yaad rahta hai. Dono kutte me se ek bhi administrator nahi hain. koi aukat nahi hai inki. DeshkeachenagrikBaniye (talk) 17:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hum baniya h hume pta h ki hum kon h . App kya jante ho humre samj k bare me . Humri samaj ka humko pta hoga ya apko .

Unitedbaniya51 (talk) 04:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Find a WP:HISTRS complaint scholarly source for your additions. News sources and blogs are not reliable for caste articles. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhai relibel source de to diya or kya de wiki pedia par khud likha h .

Unitedbaniya51 (talk) 14:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jab Wikipedia par hi likha ki gahoi is a part of baniya samaj to or kya source de Unitedbaniya51 (talk) 14:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not reliable per WP:UGC (user generated content). Go though it please. I've linked it in the last post as well. Thus, you cannot use Wikipedia articles as sources. That Gahoi article uses news sources. News sources are not considered reliable in the case of castes. Find scholarly WP:HISTRS sources of historians, post 1947, since British era sources are not considered reliable as per WP:INB and other consensuses at Wikpedia. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bania (caste), you may be blocked from editing. Why don't you discuss your issues (along with sources) in Talk:Bania (caste) instead of edit warring and adding unsourced content in the article? I told you multiple times, that the article requires scholarly WP:HISRS complaint sources that too post British era. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Or kesa souce de de to diya source or kye . Kuch bhi mat dalo Wikipedia par . Shrif agarwal oswal porwal akle hi baniya nahi hote kai subcaste h Unitedbaniya51 (talk) 10:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link to de di or kesa source chaiye apko Mtlb app log kuch bhi dalogi hn Unitedbaniya51 (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please converse in English. Discuss here. I know what you are trying to say but Wikipedia articles rely on sources. That is the reason why caste articles have much less data, since only they are based on reliable sources only. Find a good book source, post 1947 that is WP:HISTRS compliant, that says Gahoi are Bania. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Caste and self-identification

There are certain conditions when adding caste in an individual's article or adding name of an individual in a caste article. First, you have to have Wikipedia articles for them to be considered notable (WP:GNG). Second, you have to provide reliable source(s) (WP:RS) that the individuals belong to the caste if dead. Third, if the person is alive, you have to provide a source in which the person self-identifies his Bania caste, like an interview, where he/she says something like "I am a Bania" or "I belong to Gahoi family", etc. Assuming someone's caste based on their surname constitutes original research and if not self-identified (in the case of a living person) is not considered valid as per consensuses in WP:UNB. For more info visit User:Sitush/Common#Castelists as well as consesuses like this. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanction notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Wani (surname), you may be blocked from editing. Also: This is the English Wikipedia. You have to use English here. This applies to content in articles, talk page discussions and edit summaries. – NJD-DE (talk) 10:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:United Baniya

Hello, Unitedbaniya51. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United Baniya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:United Baniya

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:United Baniya, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]