User talk:Michelle Rowe

Welcome!

Hello, UnitedWorldInfrastructure, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:UnitedWorldInfrastructure/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — fortunavelut luna 09:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:UnitedWorldInfrastructure/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:UnitedWorldInfrastructure/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — fortunavelut luna 09:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Michelle Rowe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Michelle Rowe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

It is my first time adding a Wikipedia page. I have removed links to UWI's website, and changed text to not read as advertorial. Please help to unblock my account. Many thanks Michelle michelle.rowe@uwi.com

Decline reason:

As explained above, you must

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Vanjagenije (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UnitedWorldInfrastructure (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the rename (from User:UnitedWorldInfrastructure), and another admin will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michelle Rowe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have removed 10 links to United World Infrastructure's website, included media links instead, and edited most of the text so that it does not read as advertorial. Please can you give me a chance to review the new piece to see if you will accept it? Thanks Michelle michelle.rowe@uwi.com}Michelle Rowe (talk) 13:43, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your conflict of interest. What specific steps will you take to clear this? Yamla (talk) 01:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michelle Rowe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla, what do you suggest I do?Is there a way to email you the page that I have edited for you to review? I do not want to face the risk of being blocked again. Is there a call center I can speak with? I need help, and this back and forth is unclear, and not helpful. I simply work at UWI, there is no COI, I have read your Wikipedia COI page. I am appealing to your teams to at least review the changed document that you have not yet seen. Thanks

Decline reason:

If you had read the COI policy, you would be aware that working for UWI is the absolute definition of having a conflict of interest. Wikipedia is therefore all but guaranteed to reject any content you produce concerning UWI. If you want to be unblocked, you will need to indicate what you intend to edit instead; we are quite happy to allow you to edit as long as you avoid writing about your employer. If you don't have any interest in writing for Wikipedia on other topics then you will not be unblocked, and you are wasting both your time and ours by continuing to appeal. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|I have followed the links sent by Zebedee to see if I am still blocked. I am still blocked by Jimfbleak and it says until indefinitely. What can I do now? Thanks Michelle michelle.rowe@uwi.com}Michelle Rowe Michelle Rowe (talk) 07:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]