User talk:Undying Sikh

July 2022

Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Punjabi Hindus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 08:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Unbh. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anna Kashfi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Unbh (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Emma D'Arcy has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 09:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

When you find a reference in an article that contains a URL that no longer works properly, please follow the steps at WP:DEADLINK: attempt to update it with an archived version of the original URL, and if that fails, tag it with Template:deadlink. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 14:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Irish Indians, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 07:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sam Chui, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 04:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of converts to Christianity from Sikhism, you may be blocked from editing. Greyjoy^talk 21:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Canadians by net worth, you may be blocked from editing. Leventio (talk) 04:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shaun Bailey (London politician). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christina Hodson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Han and Gaelic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Walburga Stemmer

I have removed your WP:Proposed deletion for this page. You did not refer to any Wikipedia policies, and what reasons you did give were obscured by the intemperate manner in which they were expressed. Plutonium27 (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing

You've had enough of these by now to know why you're getting them. Stop with the not-so-random 'not referenced' edits. Plutonium27 (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC) (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GeebaKhap (talk) 12:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]