User talk:Underthedial

Welcome!

Hello, Underthedial, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hoary (talk) 14:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

To take one example among many, Sanyo consistently writes its name as SANYO; newspapers, etc., ignore this, and so does Wikipedia.

If Urwerk chooses to write its name as URWERK, that's its privilege. But Wikipedia ignores this. -- Hoary (talk) 14:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

image permission underthedial

I made an error selecting image licensing with three recently uploaded images: Image:Speake-Marin.jpg, Image:Christophe Claret.jpg and Image:Roger Dubuis.jpg. I have since corrected the licensing from Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 to Attribution 3.0. Would you please confirm if that is OK or if you would like me to take further action. IanS (talk) 14:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. In future, please leave new messages at the bottom of my talk page.

Both of those licenses are acceptable; what is in question is whether you have the right to release the images under those licenses. You need to link to the source website where it shows that these images are released under the appropriate license, or send/forward a permission email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, quoting the image names. Stifle (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Greubel Forsey. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will do and thank you for the tip.--IanS (talk) 07:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Daniel Roth.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Roth.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wikiproject

You will probably be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Watches, in the "members" section. Like other wikiprojects it groups and helps to organize the editors that want to improve the articles on a certain topic. (it's not very active at the moment, so you might want to check the list of members and contact directly one of them). --Enric Naval (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Maitres du Temps

Took me a while, but I'm taking a look now.

The article uses this source from 2008 for the collaboration with Roger Dubuis. Then it lists a 2007 source for Jean Dunand from the same wabsite (JCKNewswire), but the link goes to the same 2008 source as Dubuis. I tried to search the website for a 2007 press release but I couldn't find any. Please find a link to the source or find some other verifiable source. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I finished editing the article and removed the advert tag. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:11, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urwerk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sumerian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Urwerk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Image: UR-1001.jpg|thumb|200px|UR-1001 Zeit Device]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Urwerk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

s first 'winding efficiency indicator <ref name= "world's first 'winding efficiency indicator">[http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/world-first-a-first-look-at-the-urwerk-ur-210-and-its-new-winding-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Speake-Marin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Urwerk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MB&F, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Maximilian Büsser has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maximilian Büsser. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maximilian Büsser (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not resubmit as there's still not going to be enough substance for actually convincing his own independent notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maximilian Büsser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maximilian Büsser (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Maximilian Busser instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maximilian Büsser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Underthedial, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Maximilian Büsser

A tag has been placed on Draft:Maximilian Büsser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Exists in article space

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Underthedial. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of your contributions

Not to be rude or presumptuous, but the content of articles you have written such as Maximilian Büsser is very promotional in nature and sounds like it was paid for. Please be mindful of this and strive for a more neutral tone. -Indy beetle ([[User talk:Indy beetle]) 22:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indy beetle Well noted. I have no conflict of interest with Maximilian Büsser or MBandF and will work on writing more Wikipedia-friendly text Underthedial ([[User talk:Underthedial]) 07:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maximilian Büsser and Friends has been accepted

Maximilian Büsser and Friends, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 22:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]