User talk:UkrainianPatriot1

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sarmatians, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Zaporozhian Cossacks. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation of this behaviour may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 03:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ancient Ukraine (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JalenFolf was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ancient Ukraine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ancient Ukraine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jalen Folf (talk) 03:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, UkrainianPatriot1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jalen Folf (talk) 03:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Randompointofview. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Demographics of Ukraine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Randompointofview (talk) 03:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for extensive POV edits and disruption across multiple pages. If this same type o behaviour resumes when the block expires, I imagine the next block will be indefinite. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 04:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]