User talk:UkraineFella
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
Welcome UkraineFella!I'm Paine Ellsworth, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Hi UkraineFella, the 500 edits restriction described in the blue box above applies to requested move discussions too (see WP:ARBECR for details). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2023 (UTC)- This isn’t really an unblock request, but I have some things to say. I’ve proved that I would not abuse my moving pages permissions. However, the Wikipedia community has shown that it doesn’t support any forms of redemption. The people who evade blocks on this site can be divided into 2 categories: the ones who evade blocks in order to show that they’ve redeemed their actions and others who evade blocks in order to damage Wikipedia. If you do not agree with my opinion, instead of eliminating my right to edit my talk page, I suggest you provide some reasons on why you disagree. Instead of using sarcasm, we should use kindness and good faith. That’s the way of building an online encyclopedia. Feel free to tell your opinion, I will respect them. UkraineFella (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
UkraineFella (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Changed my mind, I will submit an unblock request. I have some things to say. I’ve proved that I would not abuse my moving pages permissions. However, the Wikipedia community has shown that it doesn’t support any forms of redemption. The people who evade blocks on this site can be divided into 2 categories: the ones who evade blocks in order to show that they’ve redeemed their actions and others who evade blocks in order to damage Wikipedia. If you do not agree with my opinion, instead of eliminating my right to edit my talk page, I suggest you provide some reasons on why you disagree. Instead of using sarcasm, we should use kindness and good faith. That’s the way of building an online encyclopedia. Feel free to tell your opinion, I will respect them. I will promise that I will respect Wikipedia rules!
Decline reason:
You seem to be arguing your block is appropriate as you are indeed a sockpuppet and have indeed been evading a block. If so, the block is appropriate. If not, note that you are specifically demonstrating you don't respect Wikipedia's rules. Yamla (talk) 16:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Yamla You know second chances exit, right? UkraineFella (talk) 18:20, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- They do. You don't get them by violating WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK, but may want to check out WP:SO. --Yamla (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- I guess we can see each other in 6 months, I guess... UkraineFella (talk) 10:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)