User talk:Ukexpat/Archive 13
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ukexpat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
First Article
Thank you Ukexpat for your response,it was helpful, though the article( Gbenga Toyosi Olawepo) isnt perfect yet. Would you kindly go through it and make your contributions in terms of formatting etc. Thanks Kamal-din (talk) 07:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Why have you removed my request for deletion this page has little content and links to an site offering Adult Services. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hart-art (talk • contribs) 09:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Response to recomendation for Deletion by Orange Mike
Content of this article can be modified as recommended, however notability should not be the cause for deletion. Readers across the globe have access to the writing of this author and wikipedia should offer information for those looking.
Famous people references were added as trivia and to reinforce notability. These can be removed and/or replaced with more background information, if recommended.
```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by AkiaCherstine (talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Professor Charles Stuart-Harris
hi,
i have put some links to his books in for now, although the page doesnt seem to think i have references still. this coding is not partiuarly user friendly.
if you can help me with that it would be great. he has many papers and books out there, most importantly in the lancet etc. i am trying to collate everything, but due to the older nature of a lot of these, getting online links is a little difficult. i will try my best to link in what i can.
more importantly im trying to tie this in with other wiki citations, i.e on influenza, the NHS and polio. also with universities an insitutions that he worked in.
any help greatly appreciated.
julian
--Julianrob77 (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback on the article. Regarding notability, what articles in The Times and The Scotman (scottish quality paper) on the companies progress and unique offering suffice as a reliable source and notable.
thanks so much for your help
(Emmasinclair (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC))
Emma
Revised Article
UKexpat-
I have revised my article on Dixon Hughes and would love to have your feedback on the second draft. Thank you for your first suggestions. Please let me know of any help or suggestions you might have. Thanks for your help!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DHMKTG/Dixon_Hughes
Thanks again, DHMKTG (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! AGHarrison (talk) 15:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
First Article
Hello Ukexpat, I have just written my first article and would appreciate if you would kindly review and edit fit for me to post live on Wikipedia. Title is Gbenga Toyosi Olawepo Thanks Kamal-din (talk) 21:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
John Shrapnell (NZ) page
I took your advice and edited the page to match the length and style used on your published John Shrapnel (UK) page. I also uploaded a pic but neither seemed to have been published. Is there something else I should have done? Shrappers (talk) 21:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
SD image nomination
I think you are also supposed to note on the page that the image that it uses has been nominated for speedy deletion. But I'm no guru. PDBailey (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't actually, or I don't see it. I think it would be polite of you to add it. PDBailey (talk) 20:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
John Shrapnell (NZ) page (2)
Sorry to be a pain but I have difficulty in understanding the Wiki editing guide. I hope this version is more acceptable. Shrappers (talk) 06:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Ukexpat
Thank you Ukexpat, I would like to make more contributions in the future, particularly about Southern Nevada history. This was my first contribution, so I decided to make it a simple one about one of the persons I've been doing research on. I will study and work on my formatting to adhere to Wiki standards.Afowler702 (talk) 06:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Irdeto page
Hi,
I'm trying desperately to get this right but the content keeps getting flagged. I understand the rules and have read the pages from Wiki though it's not working. How do I talk to someone live about this or at least get a better explanation. I also couldn't find the place to put 'hang on' for the editors to see.
Thank you.
Kathleen Keating WikEditIrd --WikiEditIrd (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
science
why we represent any periodic signal into sine orthogonal set? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.90.248.100 (talk) 18:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
John Fogerty
Before I reverse your edit on the grounds that WP:BLP was already reviewed with regard to the original post back in 2007 - can you tell me specifically which part of WP:BLP you feel is relevant. Thanks David T Tokyo (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- but as none of the comments in that section had any sources to support them, I think they are inappropriate...
- That's not quite correct. While I don't approve of the language in the lead-off comment, I made the final comment and it is definitely sourced (as I said) from Craig Werners book. David T Tokyo (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- As per your guidelines, I've commented on the appropriate thread. David T Tokyo (talk) 19:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Irdeto page
Thank you Ukexpat. Lots of helpful info and thanks for making Wikipedia stronger. Edits will be taken care of accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditIrd (talk • contribs) 18:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback...
... on my proposed Siddhartha translations page. I appreciate your taking the time to look it over. Odryfuss (talk) 21:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the warm welcome!
Thanks for the warm welcome! Will you be able to take a look at my article? Soccer4926 (talk) 02:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you...
Thank you for your response to my question about publishing, ukexpat, if indeed that's what it was (I'm not sure of anything here) As you've gathered I'm not terribly familiar with Wikipedia as an editor- I should probably be much more thorough when reading the information and will try to be in future! Wikipedia is the most extraordinary phenomenon, I think. It probably deserves more attention to the technical details than I allow time to give it... Anyway, thanks again. Macneice (talk) 07:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: Kidnapping of Michaela Garecht
Hello
Thank you for your message and for your comments regarding the page I created.
I agree that my article definately needs a lot of work to make it more 'wikipedia appropriate'. I will definately make the changes you have suggested. However I do believe that it shoud not be deleted for the reason you suggest. Firstly it would most certainly be eligible under the category of 'kidnapped american children': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Kidnapped_American_children.
Secondly I think the connection to the high profile Jaycee Lee Dugard and Phillip Garrido is also important.
Finally I agree with one of the points which were raised on the deletion log- this was huge event which could have been so different had Amber Alert, the internet etc been availiable. Perhaps the article could be written more from that angle?
Appreciate your help
Thanks.
Zara565 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zara565 (talk • contribs) 12:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks.
Thanks for the response, I think I did ok for my first article. But I'll be able to shape things up a bit more in the future. Haha. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drakester6969 (talk • contribs) 06:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
John Shrapnell (NZ) page
Thank you for your patience and help with this page.
If the page now meets Wiki's requirements I would be grateful if you could move it to the main page BUT it should be entitled John Shrapnell New Zealand actor. The two ells in the name are important as this is what has caused the confusion with John Shrapnel UK actor.Shrappers (talk) 07:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of RMS Media
Hello! Your submission of RMS Media at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MuZemike 18:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
- Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues
- News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more
- In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi,
Thanks for all your help and advice,I just wondered if you could spare the time to look over it before I move it out into the big bad Wiki world. I am on a mission to get it accepted, keeping everything crossed. If you are too busy,no worries and thanks again.
(Emmasinclair (talk) 14:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC))
Ebrahim Desai
I would appreciate if you could assist in this discussion as I disagree with the editor who has removed the fatwas from the fatwa issuing mufti's biography calling it defamatory. That makes no sense. How can a mans own work and religious edict be libellous or even defamatory? He has consistantly removed without reaching consensus or waiting the result following a discussion. Fragma08 (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
image on 'the birth of coffee' article
Hi ukexpat, Thanks for editing The Birth of Coffee. I would really love for the image on that page to be large and powerful, as the article is about a documentary photography project and the photography work is as important as the words about it, in my mind. If it has to be a thumbnail, I understand, but I thought I'd at least take a chance to explain and voice my request. Thanks for your work, Emiliephelps (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
looks good
I appreciate the compromise, the photo is more discernable now. Thanks! Emiliephelps (talk) 19:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Dynamic Language has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No solid evidence of notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Orange Mike | Talk 19:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, expat - yeah, I wondered about the poetry! Not only is is doggeral but it isn't encyclopedic. You want the references in the main body - =isnt that where they are? Larryc1 (talk) 19:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank-you!
It can be a bit nerve wracking entering the murky culture of editing. Thanks for taking the time to make me feel welcome!Gwen (talk) 20:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Help Me
I created a page that was deleted Can I access this page again so I can change some things, or do I have to start all over?
Thanks
Xer014 (talk) 08:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Murder of Teresa de Simone Peer Review
As you have identified yourself as a Peer Review Volunteer I would politely request your aid over here. Regards Sanguis Sanies (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome
Ukexpat, thank you for the welcome that you sent back in October. I'm sorry I didn't realize I had received it until now. I will surely be back in touch if I need some assistance.--Gdanderson (talk) 14:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your input. I am continuing to do research on Fresno Bee microfilm archives to verify the information about the reasons for camp closure. I have added a citation for the "all that remains of camp" sentence--the photos are posted on the Mar_y_Mac Facebook page. I hope this qualifies as a source!
The camp served more than 10,000 kids from the Fresno area thoughout its years, and its creation, the years it flourished, and its subsequent demise reflect the demographical, ecological and socio-economical changes of post-WWII California. Notable, indeed!
Dulcie2c (talk) 16:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Society for Mormon Philosophy and Theology stub
Thank you, Ukexpat, for your swift and thorough reply. Indeed I had been reviewing the MOS, with special attention to notability. Since it is within an academic niche, the sources tend to be narrow, however important the work is viewed within that domain. The problem of small-press, academic, and blog-based news may have stymied me here.
Wr!ter (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Draft article for Morgan Mandel
Hi, this refers to my query you answered on 17 November. I understand that references to blogs are not considered reliable. Does that mean they must be deleted from the article, or simply that I must also add a sufficient number of valid references?
Thanks, 22:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)organmountains (Bob Sanchez) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Organmountains (talk • contribs)
Thank You So Much
Hi There..
I really appreciate and I Thank You from the Deepest bottom of my heart that you made Changes on my Page of Abhishek_Kumar. But why the Wikipedia still says that the Page needs to be improved. The Picture in that page is of a Film's Photo Shoot which has no rights or claims what so ever. Abhishek has allowed me that Picture to use in Wikipedia.. I have already clicked the License, Still it's asking me the Souce..
What must i do Further?
Thanking You once again.. Faisal Saif. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmpostmortem (talk • contribs) 07:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Ellen J. Kullman image
Thank you. The World Economic Forum Flickr account is a goldmine :-) Thanks for resizing, it is indeed better now. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for responding
I don't understand, but thank you very much.
Ndaley (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)NDaley 11/30/09
Hi, Ukexpat:- The reference is to the book itself (of which I have a copy): the four citations are to web-sites referring to the hoax and it's discovery and to one of the aviation experts cited. Is this worth pursuing? I would like to contribute to Wiki as I cite it very often in my Google Earth placemarks. 'Twould be nice to give something back. Larry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryc1 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
User:Lisaanimal/NEADS/Dogs for Deaf and Disabled Americans
Hi Ukexpat,
Thank you for sending me the welcome page. Does this mean the page is under review? Or is it a suggestion that the page needs more work? I've looked through most of the guidelines and I *think* I'm close to being able to go live, but this is my first page so I'm not sure.
User:Lisaanimal/NEADS/Dogs for Deaf and Disabled Americans
Many thanks for your help, Lisaanimal
--Lisaanimal (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, I don't think we missed anything =p SpitfireTally-ho! 20:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Add photo
Two questions re photos.
1. I notice on the UK John Shrapnel's page there is a request for a photo. I have one of him. Where do I upload it to?
2. Somewhere in the editing instructions for the NZ John Shrapnell page there was an option to add photo. I uploaded one, but I've never seen it since. How to I apply it to the page? Shrappers (talk) 20:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the comments
I have made the necessary changes. Please review. Aartich (talk) 22:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: O'Neills of Puerto Rico
It was already discussed and decided to merge the O'Neills of Puerto Rico article into O'Neill dynasty, see Talk:O'Neill dynasty. The Puerto Rico article was simply copied and pasted into the dynasty article, with the exception of the list of military service, so you are mistaken if the Puerto Rico article contained "far more content". There seems to be no encyclopedic value to the list, however, and that was why I excluded it. Many families have had numerous members join military service, but that does not warrant entry into an encyclopedia. If there was greater research on the more important individuals, then I would have kept it. Of course, you are welcome to edit it, but unless more information is included than simply a list, I doubt there will be consensus to keep it. [tk] XANDERLIPTAK 05:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Wiki entry
Hi Ukexpat,
A million thanks for all your help, the entry is now in mainspace and I think it has been accepted, so far so good!
cheers
(Emmasinclair (talk) 09:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC))
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
RFA?
I was looking at your contributions closely and I feel that you are well-qualifed for WP:RFA, interested in a nomination? Thanks Secret account 15:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- I saw your response on Secret's talk page. I know you're busy until after the new year, but I'd be happy to co-nominate you/ support you if and when you decide to run. Cheers! TNXMan 16:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! and question
Hi Ukexpat,
Thanks for your message.
I'd love to have some feedback on the article I've drafted, before I move it to a live page, if it is accepted. Do you know how I can do this? I've read the tutorials, etc., but I'm still a bit confused.
I appreciate your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcs102 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi
As you have followed the Ebrahim Desai article some and made some useful edits, I would appreciate it if you could thoughts on the vandalizing edits going on at present in the name of notability and reliability as I find the underlying basis quite biased.Fragma08 (talk) 21:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Naoko Mori's birthdate
I recently attended a convention, Chicago Tardis 2009, that Naoko Mori was a guest at. Having the same birthday as her "the 19th" I wished her a happy birthday when taking photos. She informed me and others that her actual birthday was the 29th of Novemember. I've tried to make this change to imdb but it still has not gone through. They also have her birth year listed as 1971 and then described as 1975. Jdwyer00 (talk) 22:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Ukexpat
Hi, thank you very much for the helpful advice you have given me. I appreciate it very much and it has been very useful to me in this project.--SimpsonRichard (talk) 14:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)SimpsonRichard
improvements to Camp Mar-Y-Mac article
Hi, Ukexpat: I have obtained copies of letters from Forest Service files which verify the information which I previously attributed to personal conversations. So I modified the article to use these as citations. Of course, they have not been published, but wouldn't these count as a secondary source? Is it up to Wikipedia standards now?
Appreciating your expertise as always... Dulcie2c (talk) 01:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for advice.
Thank you for advising me yesterday.
--Mustardyellow (talk) 09:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the welcome Ukexpat. I must admit this is a little daunting in terms of all the protocol to follow. Oh well, I'm sure I will learn with a little help and patience from others.
Kheenand (talk) 13:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
hi ukexpat, and thanks for your message. Good to meet you, and since you're an expat, where are you living now? Just curious.
I'm brand new at this wikipedia thing, so bear with me. I'm doing a few articles on the subject of Social Security. Any feedback you can offer will be appreciated. --Jamesalunsford (talk) 14:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks, Wikipedia seems to be a valuable project.
If you have comments or criticisms of my early draft, let me know. --Neveln (talk) 15:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
mustardyellow/space2
Hi
Thank you for your advice, problem I'm having is all the sources are offline in publications. It's a shame as I can't find a huge amount of online reference, also the itv/60mm only goes back to July 08 and I need it go back further for more than a passing reference. Well I'll keep working on it and hopefully I will find more to support the page.
Many thanks
--Mustardyellow 16:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustardyellow (talk • contribs)
Festing
Simon Festing Hi, that navbox on the riight is a bit excessively visible on a blp, I thought the subject was the hamster, is there a way to move the navbox to the bottom of the article where imo it belongs, or do you know the best place to ask about it? Off2riorob (talk) 23:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for commenting, I have opened up a discussion there, if you feel to join in . Off2riorob (talk) 08:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I have sent an email
Thanks,
Aartich (talk) 23:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Notice of Electronic Filing
Thanks, cool, quick.
What about the upper lower case. Should it be Notice of electronic filing (NEF)?
InproperinLA (talk) 18:40, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Fan sites
I am trying to add some fan sites to a biographical wiki, but the edits keep being deleted, how do I go about correctly adding these links
Cheers
--Buddhacom toronto (talk) 20:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I see, thank you, where would be a good place for links to those sites? I represent Frank D'Angelo and I don't want to break any wiki guidelines, but it has been expressed to me to get those sites associated with the wiki page for Frank, do you have any suggestions, thank you for your time Ukexpat
--Buddhacom toronto (talk) 20:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I understand, thanks again, I will stay away from editing the page
--Buddhacom toronto (talk) 21:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Deletion nomination
UKexpat - Adding an article on Wikipedia has become a lot more difficult than I thought it was going to be. Your assertion "One award and one reference in a local paper is not enough to keep in the face of our usual presumption that grade schools are not notable" is disappointing. It's a national award given by the US Dept. of Education. Very few schools across the country have won more than once--we've received it twice. The reference is from The Philadelphia Inquirer, which has a circulation of a few million subscribers.Trishlockett (talk) 21:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
personal information deletion from yahoo search results.
The personal information that you said has been deleted comes up on the first page of yahoo search results when my name is searched for. Can it be deleted entirely? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neojerzey (talk • contribs) 22:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. I have uploaded an image and put link to it from the page. The problem is the image is far too large. Can this is be reduced to size in Wikipedia or do I need to load a small image? Is there and ideal size?Shrappers (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Time for another Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
You’ve received barnstars for your work at the helpdesks, but you keep on ticking, so I thought you deserved this one SPhilbrickT 18:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
No worries -- I took a quick look and saw your edits were obviously legit, so it was no problem to fix. That article has a lot of factual problems, and I've been trying to make that article it read less like it was written by a frustrated litigant. --Glenfarclas (talk) 22:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks....
He seems very determined! Leaky Caldron 22:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Ophélie bretnacher
Please, do not destroy this product.
Ophelia Bretnacher is the issue of a genuine debate on the rights of European citizens.
The problem is that although there is a cooperation agreement between the 2 European countries France and Hungary (Treaty of Lisbon), the agreement did, in the case of both the executive and the judiciary, not been observed for these two European countries, regarding the investigation of 2 fonts Hungarian and French, and also in judicial cooperation, for transmissions of autopsy findings in violation of new European laws. Only the High Court of Justice may decide that case.
This is only the beginning.
Today there were 2 more newspaper articles in France and many more in Hungary. Raymondnivet (talk) 01:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC) http://www.lunion.presse.fr/index.php/cms/13/article/393993/Il_y_a_un_an_Ophelie_Bretnacher_disparaissait_a_Budapest_____Le_doute_n_est_pas_acceptable__
and vidéo- films :
http://films7.com/photo/ophelie-bretnacher
If you destroy this item, I would have to do it again in a few months, with judicial action and the media ahead.
Everything in it is strictly proven, information is the most neutral, impartial and fair as possible.
Thank you
Raymondnivet (talk) 01:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
You're awesome
Great job with all the work you've done to help newbies on WP:FEED. You're awesome. Killiondude (talk) 06:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Hi Ukexpat, thank you very much for your feedback and help with my first article (European Youth Portal). I added a sentence about the number of language versions of the portal and deleted some sentences. I think it is still fine and I will (try to) move it today.
Best wishes Edesk (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Red Feather Development Group
Red Feather Development Group - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dschotthoefer/Red_Feather_Development_Group
Thanks for the help, I felt like it was pretty much ready, but I just wanted that assurance from someone who knows wikipedia ins and outs. I would love help on getting this live, so any would be appreciated. Thanks, --Dschotthoefer (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Christopher Phelps
The subject of the article has reverted the addition of his run for the U.S. Senate as a Socialist twice more within 24 hours without discussion. To offer input and for details, please see the article's talk page. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 20:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Timothy Hampton
Thank you. I'm a UK ExPat myself :) Wittym (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear Ukexpat, many thanks for your valuable feedback on my first article. I will take your advice seriously, and seeking more reliable sources from the third party.
Kind regards, --Graciousness2009 (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Ophélie Bretnacher
The case Ophelia Bretnacher, pointing the problem of non-judicial and police cooperation between France and Hungary, violating the Treaty of Lisbon. This is an issue of human rights and democracy in Europe
83.114.84.98 (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
User:Rasikar/Shilpa Architects
Hi Ukexpat, I just wanted your advice about User:Rasikar/Shilpa Architects, particularly about citing references. I tried to include links to articles on the web about some of the information I included in the article. Am I citing it and referencing it right? Please let me know.
Thanks, Rasikar (talk) 15:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
[Hang On]
Hi,
I wrote the article on 'National Scholars & Leaders Conference' The article was not meant to be an advertisement. I've tried to keep it short and sweet to summarize what the event is all about. Is there anyway I can improve on my article?
Thanks
Regards, wen.wen.89 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wen.wen.89 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Shilpa Architects - logo
Hi Ukexpat, thanks so much for your help with the references on User:Rasikar/Shilpa Architects. I have a jpeg of their logo that Pavithra Sri Prakash at Shilpa Arhictects sent me for my final project presentation. She also said that we could use it for the wikipedia article. I went ahead and added it but am not sure if you think it is in the right place on the article. I hope i did it right. Please feel free to place the logo elsewhere. Also, if you could move the article to the main space that would be fabulous. Thanks again for all your help!
Rasikar (talk) 18:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your guidance !Wismer2008 (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Attracting attention
Hi UKexpat, I noticed your comment at the karaoke singer and around, also that you seem to be well informed as to the places to notify of issues, I have started this RFC and have added it to the history and Geography section but I want to attract as much attention from people that might want to comment, perhaps the Brazil people but I am not sure, is there anymore locations I could notify? Off2riorob (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Your changes on Spotify
I notice you recently reverted some changes on the page for Spotify, claiming that they amounted to a how-to on circumventing various Spotify restrictions. I don't believe that was the case - the additions offer no real help to anyone wanting to do what's described, and I believe the fact that users can and do exploit these holes is notable. I appreciate you might disagree, so please come to the talk page and discuss this. --Jonnty (talk) 01:06, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
split works
I'm just trying to get my page approved...any tips? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Splitchina (talk • contribs) 03:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Split Works
Thanks for the feedback, we don't really want it to be some self-promotional tool. Any ideas on how to neutralize the defects you pointed out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Splitchina (talk • contribs) 03:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your mail and I do appreciate it a lot.
Ghanablogger (talk) 07:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Re: Feed-back on the article: Ayodele Awojobi
Thanks for your feed-back on my article, Ayodele Awojobi.
I see the sense in the points you have made. Where "flowery" phrases have actually been made by known persons in describing the subject of my article (Ayodele Awojobi), I guess it's only appropriate to cite these, or even include direct quotes.
I'll improve the language and appreciate your continuos supervision. Thanks, Ukexpat.
Krrush 18:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krrush (talk • contribs)
Thanks for your help with my page on DJ Frank E
Thank you! I appreciate your help! Chrismarez/DJ_Frank_E I added some more sources and edited the bio a little bit more. Would you mind looking over it once more and potentially moving it.
I understand that blogs aren't viable sources but the music blog that I cite is published by one of the largest alternative weeklies in the country. Does that effect the validity of the source? I mean would a blog published by the new york times not be considered a viable source either?
Some of the other sources that I cite are www.tonibraxton.com, djboth.net, and even a link to a fan letter from Madonna. Do I have enough viable sources to move this page?
Thanks for your time! --Chrismarez (talk) 21:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Reboot The Robot
An article that you have been involved in editing, Reboot The Robot, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reboot The Robot. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jayron32 22:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK nom
Thanks for nominating T:TDYK#Vincent Brooks, Day & Son to DYK. Could you please have a look at the suggestions page, where I noted a problem with the nomination? Thanks, Ucucha 20:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ukexpat.
I would like to go live with my current contribution. It has been revised and is ready.
What to do now?
request to go live
Hi Ukexpat.
I would like to go live with my current contribution. It has been revised and is ready.
What to do now?
Apdsm (talk) 11:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC)apdsApdsm (talk) 11:35, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Ophélie Bretnacher
Hello, is it normal, that Hell in a Bucket notifie that "that time is not now" at 15:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC) than the discussion ins't closed, and it can maybe change, if other people want to KEEP this article ? Best regards Raymondnivet (talk) 11:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondnivet (talk • contribs)
Reply from KSatSCB re: Wikipedia Article on "Shabby chic"
Dear ukexpat:
Thank you for your message of December 11, 2009, advising that you have reverted all of the recent changes I submitted to the Wikipedia article on “Shabby chic”. While your comments are appreciated, my efforts to edit the article were not for the primary purpose of advertising the SHABBY CHIC brand. Rather, these edits corrected several inaccuracies in the unreferenced article, and provided supporting references in the form of a New York Times article and United States Trademark Office records of trademark registrations for the term.
You have suggested that an article about the SHABBY CHIC brand should be written separately rather than “destroying the existing article about the concept”. However, the brand is inseparable from and intertwined with the “concept” because the term cannot be used without reference to its creator, Rachel Ashwell. This is evidenced by the October 14, 2009 New York Times article (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/15/garden/15shabby.html?pagewanted=1&_r=3&sq=shabby%20chic&st=cse&scp=1) and even by the prior version of the Wikipedia article.
I note that you have further edited the prior version by removing reference to Ms. Ashwell, her stores, and the trademarks. By deleting these items, you are disassociating the “concept” from the brand and its originator. I encourage you to see other Wikipedia entries, such as the article on “telephone” at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone, which neither omits mention of Alexander Graham Bell nor the American Telephone & Telegraph company, because of their relevance to the particular item. Readers of this article would be poorly served without information about the originator and the company that popularized the device. Similarly, it is important that those seeking information about the Shabby Chic “concept” are educated about its creator and the history of her business as it relates to the term. In the absence of such information, the article will likely cause confusion.
Finally, because Shabby Chic Brands, Inc. is the owner of numerous trademark registrations for SHABBY CHIC in the United States and globally, and protects and enforces its trademark rights against those who use SHABBY CHIC without authorization, the article as it now stands could have the effect of encouraging or promoting such unauthorized use and exposing those who rely on or refer to the article to claims of infringement. Surely, Wikipedia is designed to add clarity to people’s knowledge, rather than ambiguity that can expose them to liability.
Accordingly, I request that you reconsider and allow the inclusion of the changes I submitted. If you do not agree, I can instead create an article on “Shabby Chic (brand)” as you suggested, and cross-reference it when I make further changes to eliminate inaccuracies in the “Shabby chic” article.
I look forward to your reply.
Regards,
KSatSCB (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome
Thanks much for the welcome, Ukexpat. I'm modified my page on Zomia to include 3 references. I'm not sure how to move it to the mainspace--what should I do? Thanks, Nfekxdachex (talk) 21:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Nfekxdachex
Thanks for comments on Fastflow (computing)
Dear Ukexpat,
thanks for your comments on Fastflow (computing). I'm currently the main contributor of the page, and I'm somehow in a conflict of interest since I'm also a designer of Fastflow. The page was my first contributed to wikipedia. I'll take care of your comments looking carefully to wikipedia discipline about conflict of interest, and other useful comments the page received. I hope to improve it in a while (following wikipedia discipline). Also, I hope someone else will contribute to the page.
Aldinuc (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Vincent Brooks, Day & Son
Dear Ukexpat, Hurrah! Thanks for all your hard work on Vincent Brooks, Day & Son.....As you can see, I'm new at this.--SVB 09:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonvincentbrooks (talk • contribs)
User:Rick206/DynamicLanguage
Thank you for your help. I have edited the article more in hope to kill the spammy-ness of it. And am in process of adding more thrid party sources. If by chance you get a moment to glance over the article again, would you mind letting me know if it is at all getting better? Thank you very much for your help and patience. Rick206 (talk) 23:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Would it possible to request another review to see if the issues have been resolved or are making progressive steps toward a mainspace article? Thank you! Rick206 (talk) 20:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi again. Okay, article not boasting the company but discussing the notablity of the company has been added. Would you mind taking another look? Thank you for all your help.
Rick206 (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Reply from KSatSCB re: Wikipedia Article on "Shabby chic"
Dear Ukexpat:
Thank you for your reply.
Before I proceed with a Request for Editor Assistance, I respectfully request that you provide support for your contention that “Shabby chic” as a “concept/style” was “around before Ms. Ashwell registered the trademark”, particularly that “the style was mentioned in UK magazines and on TV long before” (and that these media did not just simply reference Ms. Ashwell). Although the look now associated with the SHABBY CHIC brand may have existed as “country house look” before the 1980’s, Ms. Ashwell, a U.K. national, is credited with coining the term and marketing furnishings of that particular style under the term thereafter. Although some articles seem to credit the World of Interiors magazine as having invented the term, none provides proper reference information to allow readers and researchers to verify this statement, confirm the date of the so-called original use, and determine whether the magazine does not actually reference Ms. Ashwell. You may be misleading readers by suggesting that the “style” was known as “Shabby chic” before Ms. Ashwell, and by allowing readers to believe that the popularity of the term arose from anything other than the efforts of Ms. Ashwell to promote her brand.
As you are no doubt aware, the Wikipedia article is unreferenced, and a quick search of the internet suggests that numerous others are mirroring the information contained therein despite the lack of proper references. The misinformation on this page and absence of descriptions of how the term was created and popularized will likely cause public deception and damage the reputation of living persons (Rachel Ashwell) or organizations (Shabby Chic Brands, Inc.), contrary to Wikipedia’s verifiability policy (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BURDEN).
Finally, with regard to your statement that I should “not hint at legal threats”, I confirm that I have not done so and have no intention of doing so. I have not suggested that I would sue anyone. My concern is that misinformed readers who rely on the information contained in the Wikipedia article may unwittingly find themselves in a legal dispute because they will mistakenly believe that the term “Shabby Chic” may be freely used to describe a style or products when, in fact, it may not be so used. This is one of the many reasons why I believe it would be better to include notice of possible trademark rights in the article.
I look forward to your reply.
Regards,
KSatSCB (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
I got rid of the red and left only Mother Teresa's name highlighted. Are there any items that should be removed from the article? Please give me an example if possible. In your opinion is the article neutral and detailed enough? Sincerely, --Kayak paddler (talk) 03:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC) As I move around here in Wikipedia, I am getting more comfortable doing it.
Howe Military School notability
See Talk:Howe Military School. Thanks. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 17:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Saw this mentioned at ANI. Regarding your recent edit, the cited source is from 2007 for her relationship with Marc Singer. Though the editor who removed this statement was blocked for making legal threats, the paragraph itself uses the present tense to describe something that may no longer be the case. The newspaper reports appear to date from 2007. Would you consider qualifying the reports of the relationship, or saying 'it was reported in 2007?' I don't know whether it is usual to try to keep performer articles updated with their current relationship. EdJohnston (talk) 17:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Vincent Brooks, Day & Son
Royalbroil 19:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
City Boy (the album)
I have created a version of an album with song titles on my talk page. How do I now move this over to an actual page with a link to the bank City Boy? Mcmliv54 (talk) 01:32, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
follow up on City Boy (the album) track listing on my page
Thank you for your comments. How do I now link this to an existing page (City Boy the group has a page with a discography)? I plan on going through my record collection and filling in track listings for other City Boy albums, as well as other artists where this information is missing. I am not going to create pages for artists who do not already have pages in wikipedia.
Also, City Boy's third album is titled DINNER AT THE RITZ and there already is a link to this title. How do I create this so that DATR under City Boy's discography goes to the correct link?
Mcmliv54 (talk) 14:11, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Dear Ukexpat:
Thank you again for your comments. As suggested, I will proceed to seek further guidance via the Request for Editor Assistance and meanwhile set up the new article on Shabby Chic (brand).
In response to your inquiry about the trademark portfolio outside of the U.S., I understand that such marks are registered in several countries throughout the world, including the United Kingdom and European Community.
Also, despite all of your concerns about the use of the circle-R symbol as a red flag that a particular article is promotional in nature, I have noted that the articles for Kleenex, Bandaid, and Xerox all show the circle-R symbol and discuss the corresponding companies, brands and trademarks, despite some history of generic use.
Regards,
KSatSCB (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
BCAP
Hi Ukexpat! Thanks for your help letting us get the Building Codes Assistance Project Page posted. I have attempted to upload the BCAP logo as well. If it is accepted, do you know how I can then use it in the page?
Thanks, Mlessans (talk) 18:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
User:JeremeK on the entry Shadowgraphy (performance art)
When I had first submitted my entry for review, the user OrangeMike put these on my page:
{{tone}} {{advert}} {{NPOV}} {{nofootnotes}}
I deleted the advert and NPOV because I totally disagreed. I noticed you worked on the other two. What do you think about the advert and NPOV?? JeremeK (talk) 20:34, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Shadowgraphy
I know you've already moved the templates but I was wondering if you knew why OrangeMike would put advert and NPOV on my page. And seeing if you disagreed with it like I did. Also, when I say "my" page, I'm not talking formerly about my ownership of it. I'm talking about it informally (the page I created and worked on); like saying "this is my song". —Preceding unsigned comment added by JeremeK (talk • contribs) 21:48, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, and another question?
Hello, thanks for your help in editing the page about Lyle. It was fun to write an article. I was just wondering how I move it to the main page? Thanks a bunch! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.181.190.99 (talk) 16:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Shadowgraphy
JeremeK here, I was wondering if you would be able to help me get the Shadowgraphy article to a higher rated class on the quality scale. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JeremeK (talk • contribs) 16:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
The modpodTM
Hello UKexpat. Thanks for taking the time to read my article. What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Compeng001 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
The modpodTM
Thanks for the feedback Ukexpat. As a first time contributor, can you suggest appropriate NPOV mods to meet the policy requirements? Perhaps you can also help me understand why is TM inappropriate? I thought it was necessary if the word was a tm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Compeng001 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanx
Thanks for feedback. Will make changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luckygrrrr (talk • contribs) 18:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, In November you gave me good advice on improving my draft article on Morgan Mandel. I think I've improved it based on that advice. Would you please be so kind as to tell me if it is ready to submit for review?
Many thanks, --Organmountains (talk) 00:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Bob Sanchez
Hello Ukexpat, I am getting my page ready still could you tell me how to put pictures on it do I add it to the document beforehand or can I add it when I am editing it thankyou Jhadcock (talk) 04:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi again thankyou so much its look is so much better just another question how do i load up pictures for inclusion on the page thanks Jhadcock (talk) 03:59, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 14#Category:International Christian Leadership
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 14#Category:International Christian Leadership. The category is similar to Category:Members of the Family also known as the Fellowship which you recently commented on. --Kevinkor2 (talk) 09:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy Holidays from Phantomsteve (2024)
DYK nomination
I just nominated the article for a DYK spot: Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on December 17. – ukexpat (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'm honored :-) Hayward Tenney (talk) 20:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
we took them here in our lab at our college MCLA so they are our pictures definately Jhadcock (talk) 04:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Best cape April'09
I understand your concern. I work with this photographer extensively - see another copy of this photo on my blog at [1] along with dozens of others or his photos with my words on The Times website [2]. He tells me he has now emailed permission directly to the email address on the tag. --Fiskeharrison (talk) 13:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Morecambe Winter Gardens
Thank you for reviewing my article. The fact about the significant features is actually cited in the History section- I thought I had read somewhere that facts weren't cited in the lead section, was that wrong? I may be able to improve the picture myself tonight or tomorrow- I didn't have the cable to get the picture straight onto my PC this afternoon but I was impatient to see how it would look, so I emailed it to myself, I think it may have lost quality in the process. I'll look into that before I try to move the article. MorganaFiolett (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
don't mean to miff you
I don't mean to miff you. He has so many credits, it is really hard to narrow it down to those that are most significant. If all of them are in the body of the text it makes it very difficult to read and a little pointless. Tarantino saw a lot of his work. I'd like to get together with him and figure out which one one us has seen more. Carradine said that the amount of stuff the QT had seen should have made him sick. I'm not sick yet and I haven't seen the one you are linking me to, so thank you. If you are miffed enough than undo my edit, by all means. It comes as no surprise that my opinions might differ with those of others. I do not think you could pay me to see Crank 2, for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorothybrousseau (talk • contribs) 01:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Merry Xmas
- Happy Yuletide UKexpat. The very very best wishes to you and yours in 2010. Off2riorob (talk) 01:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
I will put it back
I'm going to put that part back, and I don't want to miff you. If you undo the edit you will undo a lot of other things, some of them little like commas which will be a pain to fix. Take care--DorothyBrousseau 02:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
--Tyler durden fc 08:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyler durden fc (talk • contribs)
hi, maybe you can help me. Obviously I am new to Wikipedia. I am trying to reply to messages sent to me by other member (as you know-sorry) but i cannot figure out how to do it. The only thing I see about replying is this link which brings me to you Which is why i made that mistake. I am also having major problems citing sources and making internal links. I'm afraid what I have written will get stepped on if I don't cite it soon. Thanks for any help you can give me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorothybrousseau (talk • contribs) 15:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you kindly, but in the same time, I am not sure if I can make a difference here. Simple reason, and the truth, those who have time and money and special interest will always spin the information from information neutral to positive towards their special interest goals. What is your take on it? Can Wikipedia be a credible source of information, or it got it's poisoned injection by few who have the time money and power to control it - completely undermining the open, free, and accurate source movement. In sense, proving all the old axioms about those who have and those who do not. Thank you again for your greetings, but I feel this project is all in vain and has been compromised too much - it polluted this great vessel of idea to hold any clear water of truth. Are we so afraid for people to make up their own mind - all so Orwellian - but all under the guise of free media? The rest are held to the standards they themselves do not abide by? Accusatory the tone, and perhaps cynical, but after 6+ years of watching Wikipeda on different and interesting subject, I can not help but feel that to be true. I apologize if I spoke off topic. StopTheCensors (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Please can you look at this page now. I have put refs and cits in to a great extent and tried to sort everything out as requested. Thanks for your help. Richard Nowell (talk) 13:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
camp mar-y-mac article
{{helpme}} Hi, again. I am trying to add a citation where it says "citation needed", but not having any luck!
DYK for Famous Smoke Shop
Materialscientist (talk) 19:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
I've begun a discussion there for you. I tried not to predict/summarise your point of view too much (which would have been rude) so I expect you'll need to add to what I started. We shall see where con census takes us. Kind regards, SGGH ping! 15:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Action Against Hunger
Thanks for editing Action Against Hunger. If you want to take some extra time, there was an verbose edit a week or so ago that was very biased, but otherwise had good info. Some of the info could be added back. (Revision here) There's a discussion about it on its talk page. Justin Ormont (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: ORC International
Hello Ukexpat. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ORC International, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Needs a fairly hefty trim I think, but there's enough already here that isn't spam to get through CSD. . Thank you. GedUK 20:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Richard T. Russell Talk page
You reverted my deletion of a comment on the Richard T. Russell talk page - but the original comment was written by me in the first place. Am I not allowed to delete my own comments? I only did so because the comment in question (a request to remove the COI disclaimer) no longer applies. Chithecynic (talk) 09:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Pardon?
Where was the personal attack on the Gore Effect page in user space? It contained no information about Gore except the statement that he had been followed by cold weather on a number of occasions. That coincidence was sourced and anyway it was a used space draft? I don't get it at all. --BozMo talk 17:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your help, I hope I did it right. Beflat (talk) 17:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you again for you assistance. You've been most helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beflat (talk • contribs) 17:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Thomas Hoegh page
many many thanks for your help. i've gone through the tags you suggested and and am really stumped as to why the messages are still at the top of the page --Susanferreira (talk) 17:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)