User talk:Ugur Basak/Archive2

Şebnem Ferah

Hi Martin, i see you are British i hope you can answer this question. I don't know whether i'm using British Eng. or American Eng. I want to ask it to you. This is one of my contributions, you can look life and career part. I add that part.--Ugur Basak 09:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at the section you asked for, it seems someone else has already made a few minor changes to the grammar, which would be similar to the ones I would have made. I've made a few more minor updates for grammar and readibility, hope that helps. Regards, MartinRe 10:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Martin. Does my edition looks like British or American english? --Ugur Basak 10:10, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is a difference in this case. It's only some words that are different between British and American, eg. Color/Colour, but none of those type of words appear. About the only thing that might be different is the date, Americans would write the date as April 12, 1972, but as the article is about a turkish person, it should follow the turkish standard, so is fine as it is. Regards, MartinRe 10:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Martin, if there is a question about Turkey related articles i'll try to help. Regards --Ugur Basak 10:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting on my RfA, it passed with a final tally of 68/0/0 so I'm now an administrator. If there's anything I can do to help, you feel I've done something wrong, or there's just something you want to tell, don't hesitate to use my talk page. Thanks. - Bobet 10:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi! Thanks for your support in my request for adminship (did you know that "adminiship" is not an English word? Unbelievable!). It ended with a tally of (51/0/0). As an administrator, I hope to better help this project and its participants: if you have any question or request, please let me know. - Liberatore(T) 12:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mehmed

I've waited for my friend to give me a source, but she is busy nowadays and she is interested after 18th cent. Anyway she said, "he can be Serbian". But i searched it in encyclopedia, in dictionnaire larousse's Turkish editon's it says "Sokoloviç adlı Boşnak bir papazın oğluydu" "He was son of a Bosnian priest named Sokolovic". I hope this helps --Ugur Basak 15:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's useful, Ugur Basak; thanks! The main issue was whether he should be considered a Bosniak (please see the article). Cheers! --HolyRomanEmperor 22:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ugur. I am Emir from Bosnia. I have seen your comment in Holy's talk page. You said: "But i searched it in encyclopedia, in dictionnaire larousse's Turkish editon's it says "Sokoloviç adlı Boşnak bir papazın oğluydu" "He was son of a Bosnian priest named Sokolovic". Can you tell me some more information about the edition of that encyclopedia, because it is very relevant source. Bosniak historians also say that according to Turkish documents Mehmed-pasha is considered as Bosniak. Thanks in advance.--Emir Arven 20:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emir, Dictionnaire Larousse's Turkish editon volume 6 page 2165 "Sokullu Mehmet Paşa". About print date, (orginal edition) Larousse 1993 and (turkish edition) Milliyet 1993-1994. This is all i can found. I hope this helps

Dear Ugur, thank you very much for your information. --Emir Arven 17:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you!
Hi Ugur Basak/Archive2, thank you for your support in my Rfa! It passed with a final tally of 86/0/0. If you need help or just want to talk let me know! Again, thank you! – Dakota ~ ° 22:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Manga

You voted for Manga to be the comics collaboration of the month and it has been selected! Let's knock this article into shape. Remember, to make it to featured article status, it will need to be well referenced. ike9898 14:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my request for adminship. I'm delighted that the RfA succeeded with a final consensus of 52/17/7, and receiving comments including having 'excellent potential to become a great moderator', and I am now an administrator. It did however only just pass, and I shall do my very best to rectify any of my errors, including the general belief that I should do more article work. If you have any concerns, or if you ever feel that I may be able to help you, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Again, thank you!

Ian13/talk 19:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of my RfA

Thank you for your support of my successful request for adminship. I am honoured that the nomination was supported unanimously and that the community expressed confidence that I would use the tools wisely. If you have any concerns please let me know on my talk page. Regards A Y Arktos 21:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Thank you!
Thank you for your support in my recent RFA. It passed 53/1/2 and I am now an administrator. I appreciate that some of you made exceptions to your usual requirements re length of service and so on because we've interracted positively in the past, or because of my credentials, so I will endeavour to use my new mop cautiously. I'm always open to feedback and gently constructive criticism. If you're not an admin and need some assistance do of course please let me know. Thanks again --kingboyk 00:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

P.S. If you are interested in The Beatles, User:Lar has asked me to tag on a little note advertising the creation of a new Beatles WikiProject that we are currently setting up. Please sign up and help.

Roma people won!

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Roma people was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

re: rollover bot

Hi Dijxtra, if i dont count wrong. Your bot message to 31 users but 43 users has voted for Roma people. --Ugur Basak 11:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it has problems with users which have UNICODE in their usernames. It refuses to edit their talk page. I'll try to fix that. --Dijxtra 11:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

interesting, those unicode is really problem in every part of programming. Your bot is really help this AID. Cheers--Ugur Basak 11:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but I found some unicode+python tutorials, so I'll try to figure that out..., Thanks! :-) --Dijxtra 11:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Azeri

Hi Zereshk, i want to ask a personal question. How Azeris in Iran define themselves? Turkic or Iranian. You are good in drawing. Who is this "Anime by nima" ?--Ugur Basak 09:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

The Azeris in Iran think of themselves as ethnically Azeri, but also Iranian as well, no doubt. Think of Texas: they are proud of being recognized as discreet and separate ("the lone star state", the "Republic of Texas"), and yet they want to be American as well.

See Tabriz's page. Tabriz has always been one of the most patriotic Iranian cities in history. There are more Nationalist Iranian revolutionaries from Tabriz than any other Iranian city in recent history (except Tehran of course. But even then, you'd be surprised at the number of Azeris even in Tehran :) ).

But then again, we like our Azeri-ness to be recognized too.

BTW, I'd love to visit Turkey one day. Gotta see the Dervishes. :)--Zereshk 11:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are many Iranian tourists visiting Turkey especially İstanbul. There is an Azeri users on Azeri wikipedia. He is not so active but one of the first Azeri speaking users and helped there. But as he said, he is Iranian Azeri and not good at in Azeri language. In your user page there is no mention about Azeri language. Will the number of Azeri language speakers decreasing in Iran ? --Ugur Basak 12:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to your question is: I dont think so. Azeri language will not disappear. Even though people like me are (unfortunately) losing their Azeri heritage as time goes by (and my aunts hate me for this), but the number of Azeris in Iran is simply too large to be diminished. And Azeris (unlike many other minorities in Iran) are well integrated into the social economy. They are prosperous and hold high posts. It's pretty normal to hear Azeri in the streets of Tehran. The ideal situation would be if we had something like Switzerland going on in Iran. Take care.--Zereshk 12:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After all there are about 3 times more Azeri people living in Iran than Azerbaycan. Take care --Ugur Basak 12:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Greetings: I've found another source on Mehmet in Turkish: could you please translate crucial bits of it: [1], also, what does the heading mean: Sırp Vatanseveri Osmanlı Veziri? Could you also translate: Kökeni Bosnalı bir Sırp olan Sokollu Mehmet Paşa and Sırp asıllı Sadrazam Sokollu Mehmet Paşa’nın önünden geçip. Don't hurry - just do it when you've got time and inform me. I would be very grateful, fellow-wikipedian. Much thanks in advance, truthfully, --HolyRomanEmperor 20:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and sokolovic kasabasından alınma bir devsirme. aslen sırp olması ve olduren insanın bosnak olması ilginctir. if possible, please. --HolyRomanEmperor 20:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi; the links heading Sırp Vatanseveri Osmanlı Veziri means Serbian patriot Ottoman Vizier the text is a abstract of a book as you can see written by Radovan Samarçiç. It's about, Sokollo's hidden Serbian patriotism.

Second one: Kökeni Bosnalı bir Sırp olan Sokollu Mehmet Paşa means Sokollu Mehmet Paşa's origins are a Bosnian Serb.

Third one: Sırp asıllı Sadrazam Sokollu Mehmet Paşa’nın önünden geçip. means Serbian origined grand vizier Sokollu Mehmet Paşa's "önünden geçip" I can't translate önünden geçip part because sentence is not complete, it can have different meanings.

Last one: sokolovic kasabasından alınma bir devsirme. aslen sırp olması ve olduren insanın bosnak olması ilginctir means He is a devshirmeh taken from Sokolovic town. Despite his Serbian origin and to be killed by a Bosnian (is interesting)

I guess you found last one from sourtimes.org. It's not well controlled site, any user (not everyone can be a user) write anything even feelings about anyone. Not %100 accurate and also sentences are not in good form. So translation also meanings are difficult to understand. Also i've found one more thing on that site, again not cited. hırvatlığı veya sırplığı tartışmalıdır. means his Croatian and Serbian origins are controversial

in this site he is mentioned as Croatian. Hirvat kökenli Sokullu Mehmet Pasa.

Hir origins is really controversial --Ugur Basak 22:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (66/2/3), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! Stifle 17:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

I'm leaving this macrophage, a particularly hungry white blood cell on your talk page, I just finished a rewrite of its article and realized they're not so different from administrators, as they keep their surroundings clean, doing away with anything that's not supposed to be there...
Anyway, with that short lecture on cell biology done with, I'd like to thank you for your vote on my RfA, which passed with (49/2/0), I'll do my best to not let you down, and if you see me heading towards a common newbie mistake, please nudge me in the right direction :)

--O bli (Talk)^? 20:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JDoorjam's RfA

Thank you!
Hey Ugur Basak/Archive2, thank you for your support in my RfA: it passed with a final tally of 55/1/2. If you want a hand with anything, please gimme a shout. Again, thanks! – JDoorj a m Talk 22:10, 9 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

My RfA

Hey Ugur Basak/Archive2, how is it going? Thank you for supporting my Request for adminship! It passed with a final vote of 73/1/1, which means that I have been granted adminship! I look forward to using these tools to enhance and maintain this wonderful site. I will continue regular article/project contributions, but I will also allocate a sizable portion of my wikischedule toward administrative duties :) Thanks again, and if you have any questions/comments/tips, please let me know! — Deckiller 04:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

Thanks, Ugur, very much! Tell me, please, is there a difference between Boşnak and Bosnalı? --HolyRomanEmperor 22:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Boşnak and Bosnalı. In Turkish we use both words for every nation. Türk and Türkiyeli etc. Boşnak means Bosnian people (mostly for ethnically) and Bosnalı has two meanings; one who is living in Bosnia (Bosnian citizen) and other Bosnian people.--Ugur Basak 22:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Tell me, in that ecyclopedia that you mentioned earlier, what of the two was it reffering to (ethnicity or inhabitant)? --HolyRomanEmperor 22:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sokoloviç adlı Boşnak bir papazın oğluydu in this text writer uses Boşnak, as explanied above. Sentence is about Bosnian ethnicity--Ugur Basak 23:02, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ugur, thanks angain, for your information.--Emir Arven 16:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi Uğur. I wanted to thank you for taking the time to consider my RfA, which passed this morning. If there's ever anything I can help you with, just ask; you know where to find me. ×Meegs 07:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

File:Re-exposure of elephant - lahugala park1.jpg

I think I'm the bird on its head.

Thanks for your support in my RfA. It passed, with a final tally of 62/0/1. I'm touched by all the kind comments it attracted, and hope I'll be of some use with the new tools. You know where I am if you need to shout at me. Flower party? 15:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was confused because you said that in Turkish, both are used for all nations. Could you go over to Mehmed-pasha's article and contribute a little to the discussion, please? You seem to know much about him anyway, and you speak Turkish. --HolyRomanEmperor 22:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

WikiThanks

Thanks for supporting my RFA. I really appreciated the show of support and all the kind words from so many great Wikipedians. I hope I live up to them! -- Vary | Talk 17:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks for participating in my RfA. It passed with a final tally of 98/13/10, just two short of making WP:100. If you need my help with anything, don't hesitate to ask.

Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you for your recent vote on my RFA. While the nomination failed, I was rather expecting it due to the big lapse between registration and recent edits. Anywho, if you have any suggestions as to how I could improve so as to hopefully succeed next time, please let me know! Thanks! —akghetto ^talk 07:49, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AID

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Great Leap Forward and Decline of the Roman Empire were selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

-Litefantastic 00:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Homer Simpson

Hey Dijxtra, you've removed Homer Simpson. But it says till March 25 [2] Cheers.--Ugur Basak 12:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this is wierd. I'm very, very sorry, I don't know how this happened. I remember that the bot reported that the nomination expired and I didn't check, I don't know why... damn, I'm realy terrified now, I don't know how that happened... sorry, I'm sure it won't happen again :-( --Dijxtra 17:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it won't happen again, cause i have to RFC on you :). Afterall you are working for AID. Good luck--Ugur Basak 20:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, look, I don't have anything against Homer Simpson. In fact, he's one of my favourite cartoon characters, this was just a pure mistake. We all err, an error can happen to everybody :-) Don't take it so seriously. If I had anything against Homer, I'd state that somewhere and try to discuss things. I don't think this mistake of mine is so great that it deserves mentioning of RfC... I did many nice things on wikipedia and not one bad thing. It's not as if I did that 5 times... --Dijxtra 21:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dijxtra, i've found an error:) I hope you don't get angry, because i only talk to you on this subjects. [3] I don't know how it happened but AIDBot removed last nominee. Btw this RFC thing is just a joke:) I hope you don't take it serios. Take care--Ugur Basak 09:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hoh, hoh! I have a bug. If last nomination doesn't end with "----", the bot drops it. I'll fix it ASAP. Thanks for noticing that! --Dijxtra 12:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistence

Thank you. But I will be honest with you - you helped - but the disputes will continue. But you helped, and that's what matters. Anyway, it seems that it's nearing it's end anyway, and we'll have another happy wiki featured article. :) --HolyRomanEmperor 21:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope there wouldn't be any disputes on any article but it's impossible. Anyway if you think i've helped at least a bit i would be happy. Cheers --Ugur Basak 21:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, me too. You did help. I predict that Mehmed's article will be a featured article very, very soon. Best regards! :) --HolyRomanEmperor 13:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Successful RfA

Thanks for your support on my recent RfA, which I am pleased to say passed with a final tally of 80/1/1. If you ever need any help, or if I mess something up as an admin, please let me know.

Cactus.man ✍ 08:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks Ugur Basak/Archive2

Thanks for your recent support on my RfA which passed 91/0/0. If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message! Gflores ^Talk 07:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 19

It turns out that the new date article standard is to self-reference the date within the article. I think you can find a more detailed explanation on the project page. At any rate, I changed April 19's self reference back. No worries. Rklawton 04:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Rklawton. I'll check what i did to date articles and change if i removed self references back. Cheers. --Ugur Basak 09:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot on fr:

Hi,

If you want to run your bot on the french Wikipedia, you'll have to request authorization from the community on the page fr:Wikipédia:Bot/Statut. If your bot is approved, you'll get bot flag. ▪ Eskimo ☼ 08:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

replied on fr:wiki --Ugur Basak 09:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot on es:

If you want a flag for your bot, please go to es:Wikipedia:Bot/Autorizaciones and present your request in the section "Solicitudes" at the top. Then, will initate a votation for 15 days for approbation. Thanks. --Taichi 08:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

replied on es:wiki --Ugur Basak 09:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Turkey

Uğur, bir şuna bak History of Greece, bir şuna History of Armenia, birde buna History of Turkey. Rezalet. Osmanlının en büyük mirasçısı Türkiye Cumhuriyeti değilde kim? Anadolu Selçuklularının mirasçısı kim? Türkiye Cumhuriyeti mantar gibimi bitti yani Anadoluda? Ottoman Empire sayfasını okuyorum, Osmanlıyla Türkiye Cumhuriyeti arasında sanki bağ yokmuş gibi imalar yapan yazılar mevcut, Türkiye Cumhuriyetini kuran Osmanlı paşaları, aydınları ve politikacıları değil mi? TC nin kuruluşu monarşiye karşı yapılmış devrimdir, Osmanlının mirasının inkarı değil.

Adam akıllı bir History of Turkey sayfası ve series hazırlamak, Ottoman Empire, Seljuk Turks (yada Seljuks of Rum) sayfalarıyla birbirine bağlamak lazım. Nasıl yapılacağını bilmiyorum, öğrenmek için de vaktim yok. Lütfen bu konuyla ilgilen, şu anda Türk sayfalarıyla ilgili yapılması gereken en önemli şey bu ve yaparsan en büyük katkıyı yapmış olucaksın. Sana elimden geldiği kadar yardımcı olurum. Lütfen ilgilen, bir yerden başlayalım.--Kagan the Barbarian 11:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Söylemek istediğini sadece Türkiye tarihi sayfasına bakınca anlamadım, fakat diğer ikisine baktığım zaman anladım. Sanırım Türk tarihinden başlayarak şu tarihe kadar olan kısımla bir bağlantı halinde olmasını düşünüyorsun, bu bencede mantıklı. Fakat şöyle bir sorun var ben ne burda ne türkçe wikide fazla ekleme yapmıyorum daha çok düzenleme vs. bu işlerle uğraşıyorum. Fakat yinede söylediğin şey aklıma yattı, en yakın zamanda ilgilenmeye çalışacam. Önemli olan POV denilebilecek şeylerden uzak durmamız veya bunları kaynak göstererek yazmamız. Kolay gelsin --Ugur Basak 11:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evet, var olan bilgileri değiştirmekten çok Türkiye tarihini oluşturan parçalar bütünleştirilmeli. Sen yapmaya başla, ben her türlü arkandayım. Seljuk Turks şu anda İran tarihinin parçası olarak gözüküyor, ancak zaten bizi daha çok ilgilendiren Seljuks of Rum. Şimdilik kronolojik olarak Seljuks of Rum > Anatolian beyliks > Ottoman Empire > Modern Turkey şeklinde dizmek lazım. Diğer History sayfalarını örnek olarak kullanabilirsin. Ayrıca Cool Cat ten yardım isteyebilirsin, hiç muhabbetim olmadı ama Türklerle ilgili sayfalarda baya katkısı var, yardımcı olur sanırım. İrtibatı koparma, yapalım bu işi. Kolay gelsin.--Kagan the Barbarian 11:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belkide yapılacak en uygun şey, bir Türkiye projesi başlatarak, her hafta veya 2 haftada 1 madde belirterek onu düzenlemek olabilir. Ugur Basak 11:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

İyi fikir, proje olursa mercek görevi görür, oraya odaklanır herkes. Önce History of Turkey sayfasını elden geçirmek lazım, sonra oradan bağlantı verilecek Seljuks of Rum, Anatolian beyliks vs. sayfaları elden geçirilmeli. Şu anda en önemli şey sayfalar arasında ahenk ve bütünlük yok.--Kagan the Barbarian 18:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Turkish literature

Merhaba Saposcat, Turkish literature sayfasını FA durumuna getirdiğin için ellerine sağlık, yakında ana sayfada yer alacaktır artık. Başarılar --Ugur Basak 12:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Başarılar maşarılar dilediğin için teşekkür ederim. Gerçekten Turkish literature ana sayfada yer alacak gibi görünüyor; ben o makalenin üzerinde çalışmaya başlarken öyle istiyordum zaten. Artık Ottoman Empire makalesine geçmeyi düşünüyorum; o da çok dağınık bir makale (şimdilik). Yine teşekkür ediyorum mesajın için. —Saposcat 13:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Empire sanırım Wikipedia:Article_Improvement_Drive ile FA olabilecek, en azından öyle düşünüyorum. Bir kaç oy daha alırsak, 1-2 hafta içinde oylamayı kazanacak gibi görünüyor. --Ugur Basak 13:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ottoman Empire

Ben de orada oy verdim Ottoman Empire'a; artık sadece 1 tane oy lazım yanılmıyorsam. FA olmazsa bile, yine de o kadar önemli bir konu daha iyi bir durumda bulunmalı bence. —Saposcat 13:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1 oy daha aldığında kalma şansı 1 hafta daha artıyor. Şu anda haftada en yüksek 2 oyu alanı düzenliyorlar ama bu tekrar 1'e inecek. Şu anda en yüksek 3. oy bizim muhtemelen elenmeden gidersek 2-3 hafta içinde kesin üzerinde çalışılır. Bu gibi bir maddenin FA olmasıda zor değil. Ugur Basak 14:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

Hi Uğur! Thank you for supporting my RfA. It passed at 105/1/0, putting me in WP:100 - I'm delighted and surprised! I'm always happy to help out, so if you need anything, please drop me a line. Cheers! ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 20:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

	Thank you! Thank you for supporting / ~~opposing~~ / ~~vandalising~~ my RFA! The result was 71/3/0 and so I am now ~~still a normal user~~ / an administrator / ~~indefinitely banned~~. Your ~~constructive criticism~~ / support / ~~foulmouthed abuse~~ has ~~given me something to think about~~ / helped me immensely / ~~turned me into a nervous wreck~~. If there's any way I can help you in return, please ~~ask someone else~~ / ~~suffer and die~~ / drop me a line! --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 19:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr Blanning, thank you for choosing the ACME Auto-thanker! Simply strike out the phrases that do not apply and tear off this strip at the indicated line to give all your supporters and detractors the personalised response they so richly deserve. N.B: DO NOT FORGET TO TEAR THIS BIT OFF, MORON!

wiki Türkiye grubu

Selam uğur,

Kusura bakma fazla uzun uzadıya yazamayacağım. Grupta bir görev paylaşımı yapılacak mı ? Üstlenirsen sevinirim. --TuzsuzDeliBekir 20:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uğur Paşa

Fikir sahibi olmak açısından:

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Iran

Güzel yapmışlar. Özellikle sofrayı.

--Kagan the Barbarian 01:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kağan bu isme benzer bir isimle çok öncelerden birisi seslenirdi bana:) Ben aslında ordan aldım biraz bişeyler ama hepsini alamadım. Proje şimdilik 2 günlük olmasına rağmen hareketli sayılır. Yarın akşama kadar bir yapılacaklar listesi ayarlayalım. Şu an için Türkiye'nin tarihini 2. sıraya koyalım diyorum, uğraşması biraz zor ve tarih olarak nereden başlayacağımız kesin değil. En güzel ve kolay olarak Turkey sayfası geliyor bana. FA durumuna gelirse projenin başarısı olarak duyurur ve bu sayede aktifliğimiz daha çok artar diye düşünüyorum. Ben yatıyorum, yarın görüşürüz --Ugur Basak 01:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Turkey

Very good initiative! I look forward to collaborate with you! Bertilvidet 01:29, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it's actually a expected initiative, it's only 1.5 days but it seems to be an active project. I hope it won't be successful. İyi geceler --Ugur Basak 01:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yardım

Selam Uğur,

Senden bir ricam olacak. Turkish Kurdistan isimli sayfayı silip Kurds in Turkey adlı bir sayfaya yönlendirme yapılması için oy toplanıyor. Syrian Kurdistan sayfası silindi ancak Turkish Kurdistan sayfası için cok fazla kullanıcı bir araya geldi. Sende oy vermek istermisin ?

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish Kurdistan

--TuzsuzDeliBekir 09:45, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you so much for supporting me in my recent RfA, which passed with a final tally of 56/1/0. I thank you for your confidence in my abilities. If you ever need anything or find that I have made an error, please let me know on my talk page. — Scm83x ^{hook 'em} 21:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bir sorum olacaktı ?

Merhaba,

Türkiye projesini kurdugun için sana soruyorum bende Türk tarihi ile ilgili bir proje yaratmak istiyorum. Bu işler nasıl yürüyor. Biraz fikir verirsen sevinirim. Muhabbetle,--TuzsuzDeliBekir 11:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject sayfasında herşey yazıyor, ama kişisel fikrim Türkiye projesinden de tarih konusunda çalışabileceğimiz. Şayet proje çok hareketli bir hale gelirse açmak daha mantıklı geliyor ama senin fikrin şu anda açılması ise Wikipedia:WikiProject sayfasında ayrıntılı olarak anlatıyor. Kolay gelsin --Ugur Basak 12:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

My RfA recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for taking the time to weigh in and on your subsequent support. And I know it's quite cliche, but if you ever need any assistance and/or want another opinion on something, grab a Pepsi and don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks again. Pepsidrinka 05:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting my user page. -- Vary | Talk 15:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome, your userpage has vandalized more than mine. I need to work much :) Cheers --Ugur Basak 16:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ugur Basak Bot now flagged on fr:

Hi,

Your bot now has bot status on the french Wikipédia. Thanks for this new interwiki bot :). ▪ Eskimo ☼ 09:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

replied on fr:Discussion_Utilisateur:Eskimo --Ugur Basak 09:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DaGizza's RfA

Hi Ugur Basak/Archive2, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. Gizza^Chat ^© 12:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Project

Hi Saposcat, why do you leave the project. You were one of the importest participant of that project. I hope you'll change your mind. Take care --Ugur Basak 07:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I withdrew from the project for a few different reasons. The immediate impetus, a sort of moral one as it were, was the fact that there are certain editors listed as participants in the project with whom I would rather not associate; let me stress, however, that there are also several whom I respect, including yourself. Another reason I withdrew was simply that my focus will likely be solely on literature- and (possibly) music-related articles, and I realized that I would actually prefer to work on those alone—I've always been more of an individual worker than a team player, as it were.

Please don't take my withdrawal personally. I continue to think that the project is an excellent idea (and who knows? I may rejoin at some time in the future), and I wish you all the best in your endeavors with it. —Saposcat 08:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now there are 12 participants in the list but only 2-3 of them are active. Some of them only signed it like supporting:) Anyway maybe after a month i can remove those which aren't active. For now the project is dead. Stay in contact, cheers --Ugur Basak 09:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

es.bots and meta

Hi...

I said in meta "the polls doesn't end" not "Bot is rejected". By meta steward, the request in meta it will be do in 7 days after the voting start. The voting doesn't finish, but the will be approved. Congrats and sorry by the missunderstand. Superzerocool 19:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC) (sorry by the poor english)[reply]