Jump to content

User talk:Ueutyi/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why not check "Right Wing Politics" and then check "Left Wing Politics" and tell me that there isn't a bias. I was merely correcting for the bias. I'm happy to go the other way and write the Right Wing Politics article to more astutely reflect how they would actually characterize the movement, but you cannot pretend that the status quo is not the result of a (so far uncorrected) wikipedia bias that's a disgrace to a community only interested in making information accessible.

Why are you trying to get people banned from the Wikipedia who differ in opinion? --CheeseMasterX (talk) 08:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The wording of your edit is biased. Ueutyi (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok it has been re-edited and added to the criticism sector. The whole article is full of bias, and needs to be remade. --CheeseMasterX (talk) 08:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

[edit]

Query

[edit]

Greetings, please let me know why my article was deleted as I was still working on it. Allow me to please retrieve it. Thank you :)

Prince KC (talk) 22:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposal: New Page Reviewer user right

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to request that New Page Patrollers be suitably experienced for patrolling new pages. Your comments at New pages patrol/RfC for patroller right are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog

[edit]

The NPP backlog now stands at 13,158 total unreviewed pages.

Just to recap:

  • 13 July 2016: 7,000
  • 1 August 2016: 9,000
  • 7 August 2016: 10,472
  • 16 August 2016: 11,500
  • 28 August 2016: 13,158

You naturally don't have to feel obliged, but if there's anything you can do it would be most appreciated. I've spent 40 hours on it this week but it's only a drop in the ocean.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know right. That's why I started reviewing today (which I usually don't do). I will definitely do more tomorrow. Ueutyi (talk) 09:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gerardo Ruiz Esparza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Johann Christian Süss

[edit]

Hi

Johann Christian Süss was illegally killed by the German army after the end of WW2. Nobody was brought to justice for this. I was thinking of changing the name of the article to "the illegal killing of..." but I am not a lawyer. I haven't come across such an instance before. I think the article should remain so the matter can be expanded.

Thanks Wythy (talk) 00:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Converted to AFD. Let's see how others see about this. Ueutyi (talk) 00:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK Wythy (talk) 01:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

[edit]

18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

[edit]

21:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

23 Engineer Regiment

[edit]

The change which I made was actually constructive because the new Commanding Officer is my son - he took up his post at the beginning of September 2016. John Clarke has moved to a new position in the British Army.203.97.79.10 (talk) 04:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just googled and I can't find any source your son is the new commanding officer. Sorry. Ueutyi (talk) 04:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC for page patroller qualifications

[edit]

Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

[edit]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

[edit]

16:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

[edit]

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

19:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

User group: New Page Reviewr

[edit]

Hello Ueutyi.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Ueutyi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer - RfC

[edit]

Hi Ueutyi. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

[edit]

New Page Review - newsletter

[edit]
Hello Ueutyi,
Breaking the back of the backlog
We now have 803 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.
Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.


Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

21:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Human male sexuality

[edit]

Did you not notice that when you used STiki to revert you re-created an empty citation? The message you left on User talk:TanGND was consequently inaccurate and must have caused confusion for the new editor. We all appreciate the work you do in countering vandalism, but using automated tools carries a risk, and you remain responsible for each edit you make. --RexxS (talk) 21:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I thought the citation was done elsewhere. Next time I shall check Ueutyi (talk) 04:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Admin from MSGF program

[edit]

Hi Ueutyi,

I am a staff of the Master of Science in Global Finance program. I just spent an hour to update the wiki page, but I received your message and all changes has been removed.

What can I do to have those changes back?

All information I have posted is from the MSGF official website www.globalfinancemaster.com.

Thanks!

Him143.89.56.126 (talk) 03:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You can cite your own site section for admission requirement as a source and your content could be kept. You can view revision history to retrieve your old edits. Thank you! Ueutyi (talk) 04:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

[edit]

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter #2

[edit]
Hello Ueutyi,
Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE


Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

19:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

20:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

[edit]

Merry Christmas

[edit]
Merry Christmas Ueutyi!!
Hi Ueutyi, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!

   –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 22:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Ueutyi!

[edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

[edit]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

[edit]
Hello Ueutyi,
A HUGE backlog

We now have 803 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

[edit]

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

[edit]

Luther Strange photo

[edit]

I created a talk page for the file in question. Israeliano (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Luther Strange Official Portrait.jpg

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

[edit]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

[edit]
Hello Ueutyi,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 803 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

[edit]