User talk:Udo Otto Müller

Causa

With a new account at en.wikipedia, I want to bring in my article [ [[[1]] aus der deutschen wikipedia (de.wikipedia) mit Belegen zum Big Ben] ] from the German wikipedia (de.wikipedia) because of proven statements about Big Ben, so that the British Wikipedian can read it and maybe reverse it. Udo Otto Müller (talk) 14:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

will need re-writing in an appropriate tone "it is of course justified and historically proven" for example is an opinion not a sourced fact.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Udo Otto Müller/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Udo Otto Müller/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Udo Otto Müller! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This is not a good enough translation to accept into mainspace at this time. Parts of it are almost incomprehensible to me.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Udo Otto Müller/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Udo Otto Müller/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 18:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As previously commented, it reads like a very poor translation and requires re-writing. and content like "we refer to what is shown on the top right of the photo" seems to suggest parts of this have been copied and pasted from elsewhere?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Udo Otto Müller/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Udo Otto Müller/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hammer mechanism to clock strike (January 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvements made based on decline comments. Please do no resubmit until AFTER those issues are addressed.

CNMall41 (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hammer mechanism to clock strike

Hello, Udo Otto Müller. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hammer mechanism to clock strike, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hammer mechanism to clock strike

Hello, Udo Otto Müller. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hammer mechanism to clock strike".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man josh, ich bitte dich meinen 14-Monate-alten de.WP-Artikel https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammerwerk_(Uhrschlag) in englischer Übersetzung anzusehen. Deutsche Turmuhrenbauer haben seit ca. 1950 (aussschließliche Produktion elektrischer Uhren)

den Begriff –Hammerwerk- für die technische Baugruppe zum Schlagen des Hammers an eine Läuteglocke angewendet. Unter Mitarbeit von weiteren de.-WP-Autoren entstand der Begriff nach Abwägung im Turmuhrenbau, um nicht allein die bis dahin vergessene oder noch unbekannte –Prellfeder- als de.-WP-Artikel einzutragen. Udo Otto Müller (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Übersetzung Hey man Josh, please see my 14 month old de.WP article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammerwerk_(Uhrschlag) in english translation. Since about 1950 (exclusive production of electric clocks), German tower clock makers have used the term -hammer mill- for the technical assembly for hitting the hammer on a chime. With the cooperation of other de.-WP authors, the term arose after consideration in tower clock construction, so as not to simply enter the hitherto forgotten or still unknown buffer-spring (Prellfeder) as de.-WP article.Udo Otto Müller (talk) 17:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]