User talk:URBIS

@

No sockpuppets in wiki

Dear Urbis/Xoil/TamTam/how-many-others, I advice you that wikipedia does not like users with multiple sockpuppets.--Jonny Bee Goo (talk) 21:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, I’m not a puppet of anybody.

Smettila di comportarti in questo modo. Dovresti semplicemente vergognarti del tuo comportamento--URBIS (talk) 20:42, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN#Kingdom of Sardinia, feedback requested on a plan of attack

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DeCausa (talk) 19:17, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since edit warring on this article has been going on for some time, those editors who have most often been involved in reverting have been banned from continuing to edit it. This act impacts your account as well as two others and a group of IPs. More information can be seen at the administrators' noticeboard listing (permanent link). Of course, it does not prevent your editing the talk page to join in consensus discussions about the development of the article. As time goes on and editors engage in dispute resolution without additional problems, this restriction may be lifted. It is not meant to endorse any particular version of the article, but only to avoid continuous overriding of content, which is an inappropriate means of resolving disputes. If the problem continues, the next step may be to block editors involved or shut down the article for further editing. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let me reiterate what I said above: per discussion at the administrators noticeboard and in light of your long participation in edit warring in this article, you are banned from editing it directly. You are welcome to join discussion at the talk page. When you can demonstrate a willingness and ability to work within Wikipedia's behavioral policies, this ban may be reconsidered. In the meantime, you may not continue to enforce your preferred reversion by restoring it without regard to the opinion of others. This kind of approach is not collaborative and is ultimately more destructive to our working environment than whether, in this particular article, you are right or wrong.

If you edit the article directly without seeking a lift of your ban, your next block may be indefinite. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]