User talk:Tyewolfe
This entry was a source of embarrassment to me, as it was made cavalierly and before I understood the purpose of Wikipedia (and though the buck stops here it never should have been submitted in any seriousness!)
February 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Wernher von Braun, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please refer to the Manual of Style regarding quotations prior to changing any further ones. HarryZilber (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Henry V (play), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 08:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Suppression of Masonry, et al.
[edit]Tye, having looked at your contributions after your hiatus, you are still having issues with what WP is all about. In The Story of LSD, you are pedagogical ("we should remember...") and you are also editorializing ("has received (often hysterical) coverage..."). you have done the same thing in Suppression of Freemasonry - not only have you added material that belongs on the talk page directly to the article, but you seem to think that using a certain source implies what a single author wants, and that is not at all what the article represents. WP is not a newspaper, nor is it a place for opinion or what is "right" or "wrong"; in short, it is not a journalistic outlet to draw a conclusion for a reader. WP is to adhere to neutrality and present both sides of an argument in proportion. If you cannot edit with those principles in mind, then you may want to look elsewhere. MSJapan (talk) 20:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, that's an easy request. I think the best course of action for you is to go to Wikipedia:Accessibility advocates and then to Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user. MSJapan (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)