User talk:Tyar

This user may have left Wikipedia. Tyar has not edited Wikipedia since 25 February 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

For any discussions with T-borg, check User:Tyar/T-borg Discussions. T-borg please write on these pages, thanks!

welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Tyar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Wikipedia is not the place for pages which attack other people, or for pages about people or organizations which are not notable or appropriate for an encycopedia. One rule of thumb is to never create a page about someone you know personally, as all info on wikipedia muct be verifiable, notable, and is reviewed by others. Lastly, blanking a page is not the same as deleting a page. Please do not blank pages as doing so is considered an act of vandalism. If you think a page should be deleted, feel free to participate by joining in on the discussion, but do not try and circumvent the process by arbitrarily blanking the page. --Bachrach44 18:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tyar

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. James James 02:39, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How?

The only reason I blank is because I do not know how to delete. Can you tell me how to? Tyar

If it's an article you have created in its entirety, add {{db-author}} to the top of the article. You don't have the ability to delete articles, but this request will be granted in almost all cases. If someone else has created or contributed to the article, follow the instructions at WP:PROD or WP:AFD. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Making new articles

Thank you for creating the article. Please look at the changes I made to Thomas Adcox to see some techniques you could use to make better new articles. Hu 06:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry

Don't worry, I wasn't accusing you of threatening anybody, it was just an example of something that you shouldn't do because you can't completely delete things from people's user pages once you put them there. It's also not a good idea to say that you have something to hide as it encourages people to go looking for it who wouldn't otherwise have cared.

perfectblue 13:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series

I heard that you were getting some grief over Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series from another user who's AFD'd it.

I've sourced and cited almost the entire page with the episode numbers and names for most of the differences. Would you mind checking through and seeing if you can remember any of the episode numbers that I have missed (for example, in which episode did Hay Lin first see Eric, and when was the name of Matt's band first mentioned?).

perfectblue 15:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wedding Saga

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I'm not taking a position on whether the article should be deleted, but I'm always glad to help with the procedure. Even if it is a hoax, that doesn't, technically, make it a speedy deletion candidate, but I'm sure the AfD will produce the right result before long. Tevildo 04:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas, and May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg ^{(drop me a line)} 19:30, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because...

I didn't undo all of your contributions. It's true that I undid some of them like Caleb's description or Susan's because what you wrote was too long and that's why the article became too long as well.

Yes I undid some of them because for example: what you wrote about Caleb was not really necessary, I mean there are some sentences about him on that page and that is enough. But Caleb has an own page and if you want to write more about him do it on his page and not on the character page. It's the same with Susan. She has a very short article and there is a link on the character page that leads to this article, and that's why it is not necessary to write about her on the character page, instead try to expand her own page.

What you wrote about Khor was nearly the same like Mr Huggles' description, and that's the same with Matt/Shagon. This is the reason of I undid them. You made a lot of tables and I think it's good, but where there is just a link to Phobos' article or Cedric's, it's not necesssary to be a table. The lists of appearances you made take up much room and they are not really beautiful either.

The "Terturary Characters" were unnecessary also. There are a lot of small characters in the show and they sometimes only appear in one episode. And it's true that it's impossible write about them more than one or two sentences but they are so "little" that you don't need to bother them; and they took up much room, too.

But you had a lot of good contributions, for instance: Knickerbocker, Clubber, Kurt, Andrew Hornby, Aldarn, Drake etc... They were really good and I did not undo them just corrected them.

And I know sometimes it seems that I undid a lot of (almost all) your contributions but it is not really correct. I mean there were some occasions when I merged the two texts (the previous one and yours), and some of your sentences can be found in the current article now. I did this because I thought they had been good ones and it would have been a fool act if I had been deleted them totally.

I hope I could answer all of you questions but if I didn't, write me back. I know it can be a bad feeling when you see that someone edited the article what you worked on a lot, but believe me I did not want to hurt you and I did not want to ruin your work.

Finally I would like to ask you something: when you edit an article and you want to do a lot of edits, try to edit bigger parts of the page not just one little part of it. I mean you did a lot of edits for example in the "Secondary Characters: Meridian" part. And instead you would have used the [edit] link next to the main heading (Secondary Characters: Meridian), you used the lesser links when you edited Aldarn, Drake etc., and that's why there is a chaos in the article history because you nearly have a hundred edits on that page. It would have been easier if you had used the main heading's [edit] link and you would have had one edit instead of eight for example. Thank you.

Sorry for my english it's not correct and I wrote it hurriedly. I hope I was understandable but if I didn't write me back, and I will try to explain what you don't see. Blunk 18:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Earth (Dragon Ball), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Peter Lilov

A tag has been placed on Peter Lilov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Proposed deletion of David Bendersky

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Bendersky, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Spells in Power Rangers: Mystic Force

I have nominated Spells in Power Rangers: Mystic Force, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spells in Power Rangers: Mystic Force. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 01:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

W.I.T.C.H. 3rd season?

I've heard that FOX might aquire the show this year. Do you know anything about this Tyar? If so, please respond to me on my talk page. Thanks in advance for your reply! :D--Freespirit1981 (talk) 18:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Guy

A tag has been placed on The Guy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 15:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Washington

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to George Washington, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 18:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense of Wikipedia:Articles for delection/Wedding Saga

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for delection/Wedding Saga, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia:Articles for delection/Wedding Saga provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia:Articles for delection/Wedding Saga, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tyar! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 475 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Donogh Rees - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Monika Antonelli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chris Rager - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chris Forbis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kasey Buckley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Carol Hope - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sean Michael Teague - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Parisa Fakhri - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Donogh Rees

The article Donogh Rees has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gerald Urquhart

The article Gerald Urquhart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Probably fails WP:CREATIVE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ray^Talk 13:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carol Hope

The article Carol Hope has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP of voice actress who doesn't appear to meet WP:CREATIVE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jclemens-public (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Earth (W.I.T.C.H. TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earth (W.I.T.C.H. TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth (W.I.T.C.H. TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Elisa Gabrielli

Hello, Tyar, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisa Gabrielli whether the article Elisa Gabrielli should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Elisa Gabrielli, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! ^Bongo_matic 03:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laurie Steele for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurie Steele is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Steele until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kelson Henderson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelson Henderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelson Henderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nancy Linari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nancy Linari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paul J (talk) 20:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liza del Mundo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liza del Mundo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liza del Mundo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris Forbis

The article Chris Forbis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Weatherley

The article David Weatherley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no significant acting roles besides Power Rangers and not enough coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susan Huber

The article Susan Huber has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Xq • (^📲/_📝) 17:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]