User talk:Two Hearted River/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

DYK nomination of Buffalo Killers

Hello! Your submission of Buffalo Killers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dabomb87 (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Buffalo Killers

On 2 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Buffalo Killers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orphaned non-free image (File:Bryan Adams Reckless.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Bryan Adams Reckless.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Satisfied (album)

On 3 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Satisfied (album), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for writing such a good article, and good luck at GAC! You got me humming "I'm not Alright"! Royalbroil 13:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked (Not you!)

That IP :-) - Glad to be of service. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 16:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Fleetwood Mac - Future Games (green).jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fleetwood Mac - Future Games (green).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 23:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

GAR for Guitar Solos

Please see my responses to your reassessment of this article at Talk:Guitar Solos/GA2.--Bruce1ee^talk 10:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I've expanded three of the sections, which hopefully will enhance the "reader's experience".--Bruce1ee^talk 08:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Userbox for GA reviews

The userbox {{User Good Articles reviewed}} has been updated so that it can now link to a page in your user subspace where you keep track of all your GA reviews, if you have such a page. This can be done by adding a | and then the name of your user subpage (or subsection of your regular user page) wherever you have the template called. For example, on my user page I am using

{{User Good Articles reviewed|6|User:Rjanag/GA reviews}}

which displays as

This user has reviewed 6 Good Article nominations on Wikipedia.

There is more information on how to do this at Template:User Good Articles reviewed.

Note: If you are not interested in doing this, you don't have to do anything; the template will still work for you exactly as it does now.

Best, rʨanaɢ^talk/_contribs17:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

I am surprised :)

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		Today I went through your talkpage archive, and to my surprise nobody has ever given you any sort of official star or "smile" in appreciation of your work. Over the past several months, I've always noticed your great contributions—whether it's your FA, multiple GAs and quality articles, excellent GAN reviews, or a little improvement here and there that makes Wikipedia better—and I wanted to take some time to offer this Content Creativity Barnstar as a form of gratitude for your awesomeness. :) In the past, I've been kind of amazed at your level of mainspace improvements, making our half-nice/half-cruft pool of music articles a lot better! I hope you can keep up the nice work. :) Best wishes! Jamie☆S93 17:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Nanocon info at Michigan Tech

I checked the link you suggested (at Texas Tech), and I still don't see what you are talking about. Why do you keep removing this content? Nanocon is a well-known (on our campus) event with significant attendance. All of the information added regarding Nanocon was vetted and checked through the Michigan Tech Archives and first hand sources before posting.

Unless you can provide a compelling reason for excluding this information from the page, I would request that you reinstate it. Obviously, at least three users disagree with your decision to remove the content.

Casey J Rudkin (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I pointed you towards Texas Tech University#Student life to show the level of detail present in the "Student life" section of a Featured Article-class university article. It only touches on the highlights, and rightly so. Imagine how long the section would be if every "major" event at Texas Tech were discussed in the same level of detail as Nanocon. Since FA-class university articles, which have been highly scrutinized, simply don't contain the amount of detail you would have us include, the burden is on you to show why we should break convention. Now, that's not to say that a separate "Student Life at Texas Tech" article can't be branched off for more detailed discussion. It may even be a good idea for them; Penn has one, for example.

For Michigan Tech, what you might try is emulating the Texas Tech example first. It would probably be pretty easy to work up with complete citations:

• First paragraph: Number of student groups. Percentage participating in Greek organizations. Description of the MUB and its importance (with external citations). Description of the Rozsa Center and short list of important acts that have played it (with external citations).
• Second paragraph: On-campus housing options and requirements. Maybe a sentence about off-campus housing if it can be cited.
• Third paragraph: List a few honor societies. List a few professional societies. List a few student organizations receiving significant external coverage (in the Daily Mining Gazette or beyond).
• Fourth paragraph: Discuss WMTU and the Michigan Tech Lode (with external citations).

When that's done, no one will have a problem with your adding {{main|Student life at Michigan Technological University}} to the top of the section and filling in the new article with plenty of detailed descriptions of organizations/events/etc. There will be lots of contributors adding their pet concerns, and it will take a while before we can be proud of the article, but serious editors will probably stay out of the way since it's not the main Michigan Tech article. —Two Hearted River (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

3X3

Fair enough, I will get to work as soon as possible. :) My apologies if I sounded snippy in that response at the GA review page. I was in a grumpy mood because of something with a close friend, it's a long story. Anyway, my apologies.CarpetCrawler (talk) 05:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Full Armor of God Broadcast

Thank you for all of your help. We appologize if we or any of our volunteers did anything wrong. We really do want to get this article done correctly. I think we just had too many people doing too many updates (too many cooks in the kitchen spoils the soup). We would love to have you help us in any way you're able. Please call our office anytime to discuss it further. Kuba would love to speak with you. We look forward to hearing from you, be blessed. note: loved your Decemberadio articles! - Starla & Kuba173.88.26.232 (talk) 22:20, 10 May 2009 (UTC)173.88.26.232 (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

It is obvious that you have ulterior motives for attacking this page so feverishly. Why is it that you are so "Hell Bent" on discrediting The Full Armor of God Broadcast. it is well enough known in the Christian Metal scene, it has regular adds in HM Magazine, a strong Google rating and a significant following. What is your motive for wanting it deleted??173.88.8.29 (talk) 16:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

It is hard to understand why you want The Full Armor of God Broadcast to be deleted so eagerly. Something is fishy in Denmark..Ivanhoe610fa (talk) 17:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

White flag.. Is it so important to you that we are deleted??Ivanhoe610fa (talk) 19:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Congradulations! You have acheived in your goal of having The Full Armor of God Broadcast deleted. Good discussion, thank you very much.Ivanhoe610fa (talk) 00:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment I truly apologize for taking this matter so personaly. It is an important subject to me. Sorry for not giving you more good faith that you were only following standard Wikipedia guidlines. I am finding out now that there are certain obscure guidlines that apply to the radio industry for example - WP:RS states: "However, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable third-party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable source. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third-party and be properly cited. Additionally, an archived copy of the media must exist. It is useful but by no means necessary for the archived copy to be accessible via the internet." So the fact that many of the audio sources refernced in this article happened to be hosted on The Full Armor of God Broadcast's website is a mute point, because the audio files themselves are the source. The fact is that the references to the program schedules of the individual staitons confirm "Broadcast" of the archives. Radio stations (as a general practice) do not host archive episodes of syndicated programs. Therefore, the audio sources listed do in fact prove notability. However to pasify the naysayers in this issue, 4 more audio refernces have been added of interview with the host speaking about the program. Please re-consider your former stand and support this article for un-deletion. TY Ivanhoe610fa(talk) 05:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I see a lot of references that confirm the show's existence and that it has outlets, but nothing that establishes notability. The WLRY audio interview, for example, can't establish notability because it's not independent of the broadcast – it seems to be your host station, actually. The Hammer & the Anvil interview can't either because they are not reliable (by Wikipedia standards – see WP:SPS). So I can't yet support this article. —Two Hearted River(talk) 09:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment "Even as I have seen, they that plow iniquity, and sow wickedness, reap the same." (Job 4:8)Ivanhoe610fa (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I guess that's a convenient verse to throw out in the face of a perceived wrong. I think, however, the verse that applies to our dealings on Wikipedia is Matthew 22:21. —Two Hearted River (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

http://www.fullarmorradio.com/Wikipedia.html Delete This! 24.95.76.89 (talk) 04:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Peer review

Thanks I meant to get back to you on this a long time ago—I feel a bit embarrassed. Thanks for Wikipedia:Peer review/Everything That Happens Will Happen Today/archive1; I have made several of the changes you suggested and justified why I didn't make others. If you have more feedback to leave there, I'd be happy to look at it. Otherwise, I will nominate it for FA soon. Thanks again. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Devin Townsend GA nom

Thanks for the review! I've tried to address everything. What do you think? —Gendralman (talk) 01:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

OK, I reformatted all the magazine citations (and reverted that weird edit). —Gendralman (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much. —Gendralman (talk) 01:47, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

She Talks to Angels

Isn't it surprising that that number 1 hit and to-be classic didn't have an article? It has so many linking pages; and not just due to the template; I went through and made many artcle's context link there. Gee it's been used in games and on those gay Idol shows... Daniel Christensen (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Grand Rapids Press front page.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Grand Rapids Press front page.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

The image is no longer orphaned. Imzadi1979 (talk) 07:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Aerosmith - Toys in the Attic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Aerosmith - Toys in the Attic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Black Crowes - Soul Singing - Promotional Video.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The Black Crowes - Soul Singing - Promotional Video.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Two Hearted River. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Two Hearted River. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Black Crowes - Soul Singing 2.png

Thank you for uploading File:The Black Crowes - Soul Singing 2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Sanctus Real/GA1

Just an FYI, I think I got all of the points in your review, except for your note about the singles list, but perhaps we could negotiate on that point. Best, JamieS93 00:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review and passing as a GA! :) JamieS93 17:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Def Leppard - X (white).jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Def Leppard - X (white).jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Michigan Tech Seal.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michigan Tech Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 03:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aerosmith - Nine Lives (original).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aerosmith - Nine Lives (original).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, clickhere to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: The Black Crows

Hi, I see what you mean by the edits being plausible. I don't know enough about the band to interpret the validity of the edits but they certainly should be accompanied by references. For the edits to be vandalism the editor would have to be intentionaly adding misinformation. Adding POV isn't vandalism, so if he believes he is improving the article he's not a vandal. Looking at the edits, I would hesitate to say that he is intentionaly adding misinformation. I'll add the page to my watchlist and follow the matter a little closer. I'll also point out relevent policies to the user. J04n(talk page) 18:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

That certainly looks female to me, I don't think it will be difficult to find a reference that says so. Probably a good idea to add one. J04n(talk page) 18:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. God bless Factiva. –Two Hearted River (talk) 19:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer rights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing aa two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

The Sword GA Review

Hey there. I don't know if you remember, but at the end of 2008 you GA reviewed the article The Sword. Per the discussion here, you told me to let you know when I nominated the article again, so that you could expediate the process. I know it was a long time ago, so I understand if you don't want to do it. Thanks!Andre666 (talk) 18:38, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...

... for uploading an even better version of File:Styx - Paradise Theater.jpg. Cheers. – IbLeo^(talk) 06:47, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

The Sword GA Review... again!

Hey bud, thanks a lot for reviewing the article The Sword. I have read your comments and made some changes to the article; I hope they are to your satisfaction, but of course if there's anything else or you feel I have not changed the article enough (I'm thinking about the whole "people don't care about when an announcement was made" criticism here, which I agree with by the way) then let me know in due course. I found that after I had revamped the Warp Riderssection, most of your points were catered for, bar two more minor changes to the article. Anyway, I hope it now passes, but let me know if it's still lacking in any areas! Andre666 (talk) 19:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

THE SWORD

Okay, this article should definitely be to your liking now! If there is like one thing to change, then I'm sure you can do it and approve it for GA status :) Thanks ever so much for all your help! Andre666 (talk) 12:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1996–97 IHL Central Division standings

Template:1996–97 IHL Central Division standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Mhiji (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1996–97 IHL Midwest Division standings

Template:1996–97 IHL Midwest Division standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Mhiji (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1996–97 IHL Southwest Division standings

Template:1996–97 IHL Southwest Division standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Mhiji (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1996–97 IHL Western Conference standings

Template:1996–97 IHL Western Conference standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.Mhiji (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Your user name

Did you get your username from the river in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan? Just wondering, Inka⁸⁸⁸ 06:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5