User talk:Tvshowoflife

Hello, Tvshowoflife, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 05:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binburrum Articuno has been accepted

Binburrum Articuno, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Tvshowoflife (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Tvshowoflife! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 02:24, Thursday, December 29, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Speedy deletion nomination of Oceania Australia

A tag has been placed on Oceania Australia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, thanks for your contributions; I see that you're quite new to WP. Please don't link common terms or chronological items. As here. Tony (talk) 05:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to be more judicious with my links this time. Would you say any of it was overlinking. Thank you and have a good day. Tvshowoflife (talk) 06:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Double doodle (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This appears to mostly be made up of information relevant to someone wanting to purchase the dog breed rather than a Wikipedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Double doodle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tvshowoflife! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Double doodle has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Double doodle. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will try to fix the issues you mentioned. Have a good day. Tvshowoflife (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed PROD

Hi Tvshowoflife. I removed your prod at Mugglecast because your reason for deleting it was that we had an article about MuggleCast now so it didn't need to redirect to a different article. I've changed how the page redirects so that's no longer an issue. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Have a good day. Tvshowoflife (talk) 21:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ref names

I know you think you're being funny with the Matilda lyrics and the copypasta ref names, but that kind of thing is not only disruptive, it's a copyright violation. You're presumably writing content for a collaborative encyclopedia, so please stick to more standard ref names in the future. Many thanks. DanCherek (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m really sorry. I was not aware it was against the rules. I will change all the ref names tomorrow. Thank you for your great service as a disease researcher, you are doing a great service to humanity. Have a good day. Tvshowoflife (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for your understanding

DanCherek (talk) 13:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Double doodle has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Double doodle. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but I tried to do that and uploaded a full photo of it and got the copyright holder to email Wikimedia Commons but later the image got deleted even though the email was sent. Have a good day. Tvshowoflife (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Double doodle (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sign that the sources used in the draft have any editorial oversight. The sections "Personality" and "Incomplete list of websites that have written on double doodles" have no place in an encyclopedia article. The "Diet" section cites a website talking about doodles, not double doodles. The "Other types" section is written like a school essay or personal blog post.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Double doodle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Darkest Timeline with Ken Jeong & Joel McHale

Hello, Tvshowoflife. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Darkest Timeline with Ken Jeong & Joel McHale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Darkest Timeline with Ken Jeong & Joel McHale (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been written WP:BACKWARD. None of the sources are both WP:RELIABLE and WP:INDEPENDENT. IMDb, YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Libsyn, and celeheights should not be used as references at all. WP:EXTERNALLINKS should not be used in the body of the article, which means the episode links column should be deleted. There is an incredible amount of trivia about the podcast's cover art and a significant chuck of the article is unnecessary lists. I would recommend reading WP:YFA and WP:42.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Darkest Timeline with Ken Jeong & Joel McHale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Double doodle

Hello, Tvshowoflife. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Double doodle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Double doodle

Hello, Tvshowoflife. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Double doodle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]