User talk:Tv316/Archive 01
- The following discussions are an archive of the conversations I had between October 23, 2005 and April 30, 2006. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on my current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
A Welcome From EinsteinMC2[edit]Hello, Tv316/Archive 01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your excellent contributions and future influence on Wikipedia. I hope you find pleasure and enjoyment from other Wikipedians. We are glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for you and others to educate yourself more on what being a Wikipedian really means:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is What Wikipedia Is Not. If you have any questions or concerns, do not hesitate to see the Help Pages or add a question to the Village Pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Have a wonderful experience! Feel free to ask me or other Wikipedians questions any time. If you have any issues that you cannot resolve, contact me at Talk Page. Greeting From EinsteinMC2 Music Licensing[edit]
Pro wrestling WikiProject[edit]PS. We both have "316" at the end of our names? Wierd. SWD316 talk to me 21:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Kurt Angle[edit]Hi Tv316. I would like for you to read this link. It states that Angle's last match on RAW will be this monday against Shawn Michaels. I know this is a external, pro wrestling site but it usually posts, about 99% of the time, valid information and I would like for the information about Angle and Daivari to stay until that peice of information above is proven wrong. Thanks. SWD316 talk to me 17:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
No problem. I just wish other editors had a good of attitude as you. I stated things like this in the past to other users and they just started edit wars with me. I'm sure on RAW tomorrow night Angle will come clean. :-) Thanks for being so understanding. SWD316 talk to me 18:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Editing Question Response[edit]Hmm.. not too sure what your talking about. Are you refering to when you enter the history of a page? SWD316 talk to me 19:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Professional wrestling event infoboxes[edit]Sure. Any chance you could do the TNA ones for me? Thanks for the help. --Oakster 14:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Your userboxes[edit]===>I am puzzled I was looking at the Consistent Life Ethic Wikipedians today, and I noticed that you also have the userboxes for sparingly using the death penalty, and pro-choice. I'd be interested in hearing how that jives with the CLE one and furthermore, the pro-life one. I'm not baiting for an quarrel, but feel free to not respond if you think this will end with some kind of bickering or hurt feelings on my part or yours. -Justin (koavf), talk 00:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
===>Thanks. For the quicky response and charitable tone. -Justin (koavf), talk 01:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
re: ongoing vandalism[edit]Sorry, I was distracted before I was able to block him as well. Thanks for the reminder. --tomf688{talk} 03:01, 23 January 2006 (UTC) I removed your speedy deletion tag from this article as it doesn't qualify under any of the criteria for speedy deletion. However, I did nominate it for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth James. howcheng {chat} 01:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Chadbryant[edit]I posted some comments in Talk:WWE Undisputed Championship that I think you should read and may even find enlightening. Sufficed to say, you aren't going to get anywhere with Mr. Bryant as long as you argue with him. When he knows he is wrong, one of his tactics is to continue to argue against you and make stupid and childish remarks until you drop out, then he can claim he has made you "dance" or "tap out," or whatever phrase he's using that week. This is his way of claiming "victory" in his mind; if you quit, that means you have acknowledged his point and claimed him as correct. Of course he will be far from correct, and YOU will know that, *I* will know that, everyone ELSE will know that, but he is a sociopath and as such will see only what he wants to see, when he sees it. He's an aggressor, a manipulative son of a bitch, and will do whatever it takes to "win" his arguement, even at the expense of his own reputation. The feeling from him is that all he has to do is manipulate the facts and truth with lies and exaggerations should it ever come up; thusly, if say four months from now you two get at it again for another article, and you bring up WWE Undisputed Championship, you will get another version of what is going on right now from him. Anyway, this is long enough, and he's really not worth the time it took me to write this. I just thought you should know who you are dealing with, and that I left some remarks which, if I know him, will be deleted and given as "vandalism." But that's why Wikipedia has a "history" option. Take care. --Cainman 01:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Curps/Chadbryant[edit]Curps removed items from your Talk Page because he is the pitcher and Chadbryant is the catcher. Basically, Chad has Curps convinced that every account I create, regardless of the name or date of creation, must be there to attack Chad. Therefore Curps bans the accounts on sight. It should be noted that I am NOT banned by Wikipedia in any way, I am NOT in any way associated with Curps or Chadbryant. The reason that douchebag removed the comments on your talk page is because he automatically reverts ANY comments that my accounts make after he bans the account in question -- regardless whether or not the comments are on topic. He's erased quite a few of my comments and changes to User and Talk pages that contributed in a significant way, and he simply doesn't give a shit about doing so. In my opinion he's one of the worst Wikiadmins on here, due to his "shoot first, ask questions later" behavior. I would suggest that you forget about getting an explanation out of him -- one of his little quirks is that after he does this, he doesn't bother to explain his actions. You were right to post to his Talk Page and question why he did it; just don't expect an answer anytime this week or month or year or millineum. I think you can see, however, that my comments about Chad were right on the money -- he immediately moved into "manipulate mode" and stated that I had "recruited" you to "help" me in my little "war" against him. This is of course as far from the truth as you can get -- but I believe I explained this to you already that this is precisely how Chad operates. He's a sociopath, a manipulator, and whatever it takes to get what he wants is what he is going to do. In this case, he's got poor Curps on his side, and that's a bad thing, but you see my point. By the way, once Curps gets wind of these remarks, you can probably expect them to vanish as well. Curps, much like Chad, isn't too happy about people posting negative remarks about him and his behavior. -- The User Formerly Known As Cainman AKA I Had To Create This New Account As --Some Pig 02:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC) Chadbryant at it again[edit]Please take a look at the history on the talk page of WWE Undisputed Championship. You will find that Mr. Bryant is once again removing the comments of others. Could you please contact an admin about this (preferably not Curps, for obvious reasons)? While we are certainly not "best friends" as he has tried to claim in past remarks and edits, I believe you and I still share a common dislike of Mr. Bryant and his childish (and unnecessary) actions, and perhaps between the two of us (well, you and the admin) we can solve this "problem" or put a stop to it completely. I say this in all seriousness, but not under a registered account because, well, you know...that whole "Curps" thing. -- Cainman AKA --166.102.104.90 04:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Wikimedia Canada[edit]Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 04:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC) The user Chadbryant is committing vandalism again.[edit]He's deleting entire chunks of evidence re: the WWE name change debate from Talk:WWE Undisputed Championship, apparently classifying any additional information contradicting his insistences as vandalism. After a long look at his editing history, I honestly think this user is a lifetime vandal and troll with no hope of recovery. Perhaps we should work together to get the banning process rolling, because the pro-wrestling Wikiproject just cannot survive with wild people constantly flaunting their lack of self-control and discipline. 72.36.250.130 23:48, 3 February 2006 (UTC) I think they were Chad, yea.[edit]I read how one of the vandals on your talk page said that "I always win." Chadbryant sent me an AIM back in December telling me this exact statement. It's part of his aggressive sociopathic nature and his narcisstic, egomaniacial, meglaomaniacal, antisocial response in how he perceives the world around him and deals with human interaction ahd behavior (at least on the Internet -- offline, he's pretty much a coward). You also mentioned that the word "cockholster" (if that's even a word?) was used. Okay, I posted to a forum mentioning in passing how Chad has used the phrase "cockholster" numerous times in the last year or so alone. Therefore there was the possibility that someone who was lurking in or posting to those forums (or even someone from the Usenet newsgroup rec.sport.pro-wrestling) was the one behind that. HOWEVER the phrase "I always win" has generally only been used by the Bloated Bluto on a few specific occassions -- the AOL Instant Messenger IM I received among them. Given this, and your circumstantial evidence showing his not editing as "Chadbryant" within the time frame of the vandals, I do have to agree with your assumption that it was him. One part of his behavior on rec.sport.pro-wrestling (RSPW) has been to create sockpuppets and use them in either a defense of his own person or possibly an attack on those he does not like. Then "Chad" comes along and claims that he has no clue who the person is but at the same time will generally agree with them or make his own remarks as well. So what you basically have here is a type of transference -- he has moved from RSPW to Wikipedia, with more than predictable results. You have my apologies for this, but at least now after all you have gone through with WWE Undisputed Championship you are able to see what I and many others have been dealing with for years now. It can be quite maddening at times, mostly because he doesn't give a shit about how he comes across so long as he "wins" in the end. --166.102.104.33 02:39, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
WWE Championship[edit]I contacted WWE Corporate regarding the date of the switch. I posted the email on the articles talk page. The official date as stated in the email and to me by the WWE is May 6th, 2002. This resolves the issue. TruthCrusader Chad's lost it completely[edit]Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Chadbryant
Are you a vandal?[edit]According to Chadbryant you are. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chadbryant for details; however, in case he removes the comments (as he tends to do) and you cannot find them in his history page (as it can be difficult to do so due to his behavior) here is the full text of what he has written in regards to an admin who blocked him for violation of the 3RR rule: Very simple explanation - two users (both with "316" in their usernames, a markish reference to Stone Cold Steve Austin) have seen fit to mimic the behaviour of the individual referenced at the top of this page to revert or vandalize my contribs with unsubstantiated rumour, or general troublemaking. In the past, I have been able to make clear to any interested admins my intent, as well as the fact that I'm merely being bold when I'm protecting articles from vandalism. Unlike some I have had to deal with here, I am here to contribute, not to engage in disputes with immature trolls. - Chadbryant 23:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
WOW! Very well said tv316!! I thought I was bad, but to be hnest there are a lot of fools that go around parading like they know so much about the wrestling industry, but in reality know nothing such as "Lil crazy thing" Fr3nZi3 17:41, 7 April 2006 (UTC). Drugs[edit]Your userboxes tell a strange story. You say you're drug-free, then say you favour the legalization of cannabis, then say you're opposed to drugs and any legalization of them. What's up with that? Is one of your personalities a druggies, and the other is totally opposed to them. If so, that's kind of cool, but otherwise...
Re: User:Chadbryant[edit]Hi, Tv316. Would you mind bringing it up at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents instead? Thanks, Sango123 (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC) Capitulation[edit]You might want to be careful about how you capitulate to Chadbryant's demands...and yes, I call them demands because no matter what form they take or how he says it, it's always a demand. Remember, the man has the emotional maturity of a toddler. Anyway, what I'm getting at is that he has been known in the past to use services and proxies and whatever to mask his identity; he is more than aware of and knowledgable on how to use IPs at other locations that he is allegedly "not at" to make it look like someone else is up to no good. PHYSICALLY he may not be at those locations; in cyberspace, however, it's a different story. Just a heads up. --Eat At Joes 03:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Ok[edit]As per your idea, I'll do it. Thanks. TruthCrusader 22:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC) Laff...well he is already starting with the 'real info' posting. i swear I'm trying to stay away from taking him to arbitration, but I just might have to. TruthCrusader 23:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
User:Curps is either, on purpose or by accident, totally confusing the whole RFA thing. TruthCrusader 16:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
TruthCrusader 16:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. --Nlu (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]Thanks for dealing with the vandalism by 68.110.9.62. -- Jeff3000 04:46, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
You know you want to rub my face in the dirt, so try it some more! Abuse me, rape me my friend! 68.110.9.62 10:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Help on Canada page[edit]Hey Tv316, I was wondering if you could help find references for the Canada page. There's a list of sections that needs references on the Talk:Canada page, and people are signing up to find references for each section. Thanks. -- Jeff3000 18:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Thank you[edit]Thanks for your help managing the edits of 67.150.78.223 and his other IP Adresses (67.150.72.191 67.150.74.210 and 67.150.65.40) *He's the guy editing the DoomsDay Device and Flying Clothesline sections aswell as other pages badly*... anyway thanxs again and hopefully he will get the picture soon --- Paulley 10:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC) Thanks[edit]Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my user page. Canderson7 (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Your nom.[edit]If you recall, Naconkantari didn't go through with your nom from a couple weeks back. Just thought I'd let you know, since you wanted to nominate him in the first place, that another RfA is happening now. You may want to check it out. Thanks. --Jay(Reply) 23:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Thanks![edit]Thanks for removing vandalism by 81.178.103.67.. I have to say, it's strange to be vandalized with a "stop your vandalism" message. Thank you! CasualFighter 22:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC) vandalism[edit]That guy just keeps coming back, so annoying when vandals have access to new IPs --Obli (Talk)? 22:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC) RFC[edit]Did it right this time. TruthCrusader 21:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC) Userboxes controversy[edit]I am surprised you don't have the "This user supports userboxes" userbox. -- max rspct leave a message 00:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
My User page[edit]Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my User page. tv316 17:18, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Re: AfD Question[edit]I see you closed up the AfD discussion for All-Wrestling_Talk, but you did not delete the article in question. Is there a reason for it still being up? Sorry, but I don't fully know all the deletion policies that there are. Thanks.
Thanks[edit]Thanks for quickly reverting the threatening message posted to my talk page by Colonel Graff. Given his history here and on Usenet, I have no choice but to assume that it's a sockpuppet of TruthCrusader. - Chadbryant 22:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Don't be fooled[edit]I would not take anything that Chadbryant tells you about TruthCrusader or DickWitham seriously. Chad, as you may well be aware of by now, has a history of lying and manipulating his way around the facts to make himself appear like the victim when he's really the bad guy all along. Whatever he sent you, you can bet the majority of it -- if not the whole thing -- is a pack of lies. --FARVA 08:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Non-admins closing out AfDs[edit]Should I not have closed down the Beverly Polcyn AfD even though, as the nom, I withdrew it? I only closed it because I didn't want it to float for 7 days until an admin checked today's deletion page, in a week. tv316 11:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Closing rfa nominations[edit]Thank you for doing that - it was completely my error - my other half was nagging me constantly in my ear about taking the rubbish out at the time, and I wasn't really concentrating. It now looks like it should! -- Francs2000
My RFA[edit]
Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC) WWE Juniors?[edit]Where did it go? I don't understand. Ad it al 00:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC) They were released Fr3nZi3 17:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Hangman[edit] Congrats on guessing the phrase! Very nice work! --lightdarkness (talk) 19:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Tawkerbot2[edit]It will escalate a test1 to a test4 within a specific amount of time (I don't have the code in front of me, sry), it looks for test1 only at the moment, I'll add bv to the list -- Tawker 20:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC) Freaksaw[edit]The film is processing though IMDB as we speak, I got the Budit wrong its $2,000,000 (according to yahoo films UK). Becky-RE-fan 21:13, March 18, 2006 (UTC)
Current WWE roster[edit]I made some changes to the Current World Wrestling Entertainment roster. I thought I would get some feedback from the major contributors to the article.
You're input on the changes and and any hidden mistakes you find would be appriciated. Moe ε 17:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC) Cheating[edit]Well, thanks for being nice to me on Nacon's talk page; and sorry for "beating" you to the punch; but I kinda used cheats. I whipped up a template today; just insert {{status|*put user name here*}}
into a page and that whole thing pops up. Feel free to use it, of course!
M o P 04:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Feel free to use things on my page; most of it is stolen in turn from other users. M o P 04:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Re: (aeropagitica)[edit]Hello! Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! Looks like someone who is interested in Grindcore didn't like something that I did to an article - deleted it, most likely. You beat me to the reversion by seconds & I'm grateful that you took the time. Shame the vandal did the deed behind an IP address and not signed in - what a coward! Can't be too difficult to block, though. Regards, (aeropagitica) 16:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
You're welcome and thanks for the compliments. Now with 1800 pages on my watchlist, I expect a raise in my pay to keep reverting the vandalism to your page. Since I asked you that one simple deletion question, I'll always have your pages on my watchlist, so I'll always be there to revert the vandalism done to you. That's basically what I do now. Vandalism and spelling. Glad to help. By the way, I've been getting extremely slow speeds on here today. Is it going fine for you, or are you also experiencing 3 minute page loads? tv316 20:56, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
My user page[edit]Thanks for the revert on my page. They're like mosquitoes tonight. tv316 08:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Anon editor[edit]Think we should block him? — Deckiller 00:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
User Jordans[edit]I wish to apolagize for the actions of vandalisim on wikkipedia that were made on my user. I can assure you that it will not happen again.I would also like to congratulate youre efforts of removing vandalisim on wikkipedia. Keep up the good work.--Jordans 03:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Why are your reverting my work[edit]Hello tv316 this is 71.52.210.253 and I am not a vandal yet for some reason you have reverted the last three edits I have made. The first was adding more information to the PPV One Night Only which I only resently got finished defending at the Montrial Screwjob talk page. the other two were cearecting a bite of HBK triva I added a few weeks ago about his wrestlemania record which I had said was 3-8 but was realy 3-9. Why did you revert these edits. thank you tv316 for reterning my ONO infermation and editing some of my work. I could have sworn that the Rockers lost to Barbarean and Haku at WM7 but it turnes out I was wrong. Thanks for the status trick[edit]Hey, I noticed your recommendation on Deckiller's talk page - it's neat. Thanks for showing it to me; I'm using it myself now :). -Xol 23:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Monobook[edit]Hey, I'm confused about one thing: how do I get it so that the template shows the offline/busy/online thing? Do I have to somehow create the template?
RfA[edit]
Super vandalism fighter[edit]I wanted to thank you for your guarding of my user page against vandalism a few minutes ago by the anonymous vandal. I see that you may have an RfA in your future. If so, you have my vote. --Danaman5 07:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
My user page[edit]You're welcome. Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page numerous times too! - Tangotango 09:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Dont worry he is a friend just playing around and learning its ok :) Mike Beckham 12:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
83.139.69.26[edit]Something needs to be done with 83.139.69.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). That user has repeatedly adding spam links over 20 times in the past 24 hours. I have reverted his spam links way too many times already. —RJN 12:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC) Fair use images[edit]Hello Tv316. Images under fair-use are not allowed on user page, but rather on articles related to the image. To figure out what images your allowed on your user page, all you have to do is locate the image and check the tags featured on it (ex. WWE's logo picture has the fair-use tag on it). To which one's you can't use, that would include logos of teams/groups/bands, screenshots, and other images not distributed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Moe ε 22:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC) I managed to find it[edit]I have finally managed to find your talk page expect me to be writing on here regularly.Fr3nZi3 03:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Though[edit]I don't know how to send you a message,I will say it HERE. on the match types I could have posted the types of matches from other places,and the link could have been a FANSITE like other pages of SUPERSTARS on here have.So that could have been on topic Ads[edit]I was mainly talking on NEW match types and a created one,and like all of those superstar fansites I linked my site in the link space,and it's not privite it's open to anyone.My other fansite seemed fine only correction was that I forgot to put down fansite for Ken Doane in the links. Vandalism reversion[edit]Hi, I appreciate your efforts with reversion of vandalism. However, please take care to ensure that you revert back to the last "good" version, such as in this case- the previous two edits were also vandalism, so the version you reverted to was still a vandalised version. The danger is that people will think "reverted vandalism, that must be a good version", and will use that as the basis for future edits, letting the previous two vandalism edits become embedded. Fourohfour 11:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
ARV[edit]Thanks for your interest in ARV :P As of right now, ARV has a few dependencies that it relies on, however, your monobook already has them! Add the following after your other includes. inc("User:Lightdarkness/aiv.js");
That should do the trick, make sure you do a hard refresh after adding it. Now, a tab will appear on all user talk pages with a button to "Report". Enter the reason, and it'll be inserted on AIV! I will be adding new features to it in the coming days, along with other report links on contribution pages. If you have any questions or bug reports, let me know, but just remember, it only works with Firefox. --lightdarkness (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Re: My user page[edit]Glad to help. :) Regards, Sango123 (e) 23:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism on my page[edit]
Mickie's finisher[edit]Is Mickie's DDT a spinning spike DDT or is it a standing tornado DDT?? Let me know please. 165.196.194.133 20:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Request for Adminship[edit]I'm sorry to have to bear the bad news that your RfA was unsuccessful; I have closed it as no consensus with a final tally of 41/17/11. I encourage you to keep working hard in your areas of interest and to run again when you feel the time is right. If I can be of any help to you, please don't hesitate to ask. Essjay Talk • Contact 17:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC) I told you so![edit]I told you that Mickie will win the Women's Championship! Welcome to VandalProof[edit]Thanks for your interest in VandalProof. I've added you to the list of authorized users, and I will do my best to notify you once a download becomes available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 21:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Vandalism[edit]This is about user on 59.163.25.48 . This is a proxy server common for all students of IIT Bombay. Anonymous users sometimes do indulge in vandalism. This is not an individual server.Cygnus_hansa 18:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC) A Download Is Now Available[edit]I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel (Talk) 09:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC) VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download[edit]Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC) Happy Easter[edit]
PLEASE ASSIST, WRESTLING FANS OF WIKIPEDIA[edit]Me and the soon to be departing (hopefully not) Moe Epsilon are setting up a project to deal with the music of this great business. It will be Wikipedia:WikiProject Music of wrestling. Join if you are remotely interested - every little helps! Thanks. Kingfisherswift 17:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC) This is Moe[edit]
|
