User talk:Turan.zwak

October 2023

Hi Turan.zwak! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Safi (tribe) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Safi (tribe), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Additionally, you must refrain from any further personal attacks. Discuss content, not other editors. (bojo)(they/them)(talk) 09:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Safi (tribe), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. (bojo)(they/them)(talk) 09:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Safi is Pashtun tribe.

Please take your time to find an old historical book or source that mentions the Safi tribe as Dardic, even if it's a mistaken reference. I'm eager to see it. Lamer safi (talk) 10:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Safi are Pashtuns

The Safi people, an integral part of the Pashtun community, are known for their rich cultural heritage and strong Pashto identity. While they primarily identify as Pashtuns.

Now Could you please share any historical book or source that mentions the Safi tribe as Dardic? Turan.zwak (talk) 09:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Safi Pashtun

It's rather amusing when someone attempts to change the identity or tribal society of a group without understanding their system, backed by no historical evidence. May I ask who has granted you the authority to make such changes when you lack knowledge about the subject? Turan.zwak (talk) 10:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Walamba.kana per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Walamba.kana. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 11:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #80441 is closed.

Aside from the sock puppetry/check user issues, user clearly is not compatible with a collaborative work environment. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know anything about what's going on and you're just copying and pasting 'sock puppetry' without understanding, the problem, and you think I'm doing wrong, I don't give a damn what you think, and what you're, so Wikipedia full of nonsense, it's not my concern anymore. If you're missing the point. So here, everyone can come to Wikipedia and they write shit about someone's history and tribal society, and a person in the back can't defend his history and tribal society. 👏 Turan.zwak (talk) 12:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is you are using multiple accounts to push your views and to attack those who disagree with you. Please feel free to request unblocking via your original account.. Thanks.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to make this clear: I'm not here to mince words or attack those who hold differing opinions. I'm here to share facts. But it's infuriating when certain individuals unabashedly peddle baseless and inaccurate information. Take, for example, those who falsely claim expertise on our Pashtun tribal society without any real connection to it, no grasp of our culture, and not a single historical source or shred of evidence from books to back their grandiose claims.

Let's not sugarcoat the truth here. Many of these individuals hail from Iran and Pakistan, two countries with far-from-ideal relationships with Afghanistan. Their intentions are crystal clear – they aim to mislead and distort our culture, tribal society, and history, all without a single historical source to substantiate their far-fetched tales.

Indeed, relying on Wikipedia or similar sources to defend our history, culture, and tribal society is utterly futile. Frankly, it's filled with inaccuracies and unreliable information. Turan.zwak (talk) 00:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]