User talk:Tupolevjet

Welcome

Hello, Tupolevjet, and Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions click on the links in the Getting Help section below, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Try to fill in the edit summary field with each edit made to pages. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

February 2013

Hello, I'm 71.234.215.133. An edit that you recently made to Man-eater seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 71.234.215.133 (talk) 01:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dublin Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at South Dublin, you may be blocked from editing. Murry1975 (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Ww2censor. An edit that you recently made to Dublin seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dublin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Murry1975 (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Mcdonald Douglas KC 10 (NETHERLANDS

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Mcdonald Douglas KC 10 (NETHERLANDS. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – McDonnell Douglas KC-10 Extender. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at McDonnell Douglas KC-10 Extender – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GILO A&E⇑ 19:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of rivers of Europe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}
**[[Stryama]] (near [[Sadovo]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please stop edit warring against consensus at Irish county articles. Snappy (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring against consensus at Irish county articles. Laurel Lodged (talk) 21:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fingal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Snappy (talk) 21:42, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fingal. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Murry1975 (talk) 21:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Irish counties

If you want to discuss this issue then do so at WT:IE#Edit warring at counties of Ireland. Snappy (talk) 21:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus and discussion

Tupolevjet I notice that you seem to editing articles in a manor that contrary to what has been agreed. When editing a page in a certain way it maybe view as disruptive, or for your own view. We use sources on the encyclopedia here. If you are not open to editing in a constructive form and discussion when reverted then admin attention may be required. If you have any questions feel free to ask, be polite and please remember to understand the the principles of Wikipedia. Murry1975 (talk) 21:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Fingal

Please be aware of WP:3RR. Any further reverts on this page may lead to sanctions. Snappy (talk) 21:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fingal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Murry1975 (talk) 21:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Murry1975 (talk) 22:00, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me Materialscientist

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tupolevjet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Materialscientist PLEASE unblock me i am quit new and did not know how to mail in it so i could try to sort out but before you blocked me i did try and sort it out .I was doing know violent things ,all i was trying to do correct the counties of Ireland they were saying there are 37 counties when there are 32 the 5 they were saying were saying are administrate counties ,just divisions of 2 counties . i was telling the correcting them and was not engaging in no editing war and one of them Murry75 said that i was vandalizing .what was on a lot of my mail when i was not vandalizing trying to put the right stuff on Wikipedia . i'm sorry i you thing i'm doing something bad . i hop i can be helpful on Wikipedia

Decline reason:

You were warned three times before being blocked. The block is fairly short, so please spend the time reading up on relevant policy and guidelines to better understand the do's and don'ts of Wikipedia. Bjelleklang - talk 21:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at South Tipperary, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Murry1975 (talk) 10:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Your recent editing history at [[:Gaelic football]] shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Please discuss all future changes to the article at Talk:Gaelic_football to achieve WP:Consensus. Blethering Scot 22:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Im not interested in debating the issue, I'm totally impartial. However you cannot edit war and must discuss at this Talk page before doing any further reverts, that would include providing actual evidence of this. It seem's you have had plenty of warning regarding the matter already.Blethering Scot 17:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not interest ether with a debating issue I am just want to have the right information up ,your right and i am right .

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it's

You changed my edit on gealic football ,form peile to peil ,peil is not a word on its own ,peil ghealech is a word but peil Is not a word ,but peile is ,I am just saying peile is football and Gaelic football is peil ghealach ,please do not go into a war with this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tupolevjet (talk • contribs) 18:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked before because of this edit - discuss on the Gaelic football talk page before continuing to edit war. Denisarona (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at McDonnell Douglas DC-10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 00:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of sovereign states and dependent territories in Asia, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 00:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to McDonnell Douglas DC-10. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Dawnseeker2000 17:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Empire vs kingdom

Hey, just wanted to clarify something: the Gaels never really had an empire because to have one they would have to have had control of several different countries at the same point in time. They had kingdoms, but none that were large and in control enough of any specific area to qualify as an empire. The term "empire" is used quite liberally nowadays to signify any anything someone controls. Basically if I were to use it properly in today's society, let's say John owns one restaurant chain. It's a big company, but more akin to a kingdom since that's all he owns. But if he owns several restaurant chains (say McDonald's, Quiznos, and Blimpies, among multiple others) then that would be considered an empire. Although if there was a Gael Empire and you were shown proof of this existence, you would need to show the sources you got this information from. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, of several kinds. Despite several blocks for edit warring you still continue to edit war, as you have been doing recently at Gaelic football and at McDonnell Douglas DC-10. You have continued your attempts to impose your view of how Irish counties should be recorded in articles, despite the fact that it must have long since been evident to you that your view is against consensus. You also seem to sometimes lack an understanding of what you are doing, as in your edits to the info box at McDonnell Douglas DC-10, where giving the parameter "retired" the value "passenger" makes no sense. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tupolevjet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is unfair.my reason on dc 10 all I was trying to do was say that it's retired on passenger flights ,I never knew it was being deleted because it made no sense ,nobody told me that it made no sense and just got block and I do not do disrupting editing and I do not vandalise ,all I am trying to do is put the right information ,what I do,in the Irish counties I was putting the right information ,how do I know I am irish and there's only 32 counties not 36 and back then I was only new and didn't know about unblocking and not a lot about and still don't because a all the time of being blocked even though I didn't do anything wrong .do you know what it's like to be blocked for putting the right information on and being accused of vandalising I fell like I have know rights to edit .with the counties between 90% and 99% of Irish people should agree on the counties and with gealic football in Irish Is gealach peil but short is peile not peil I know ,ask a person from a Gaeltacht what is the Irish for football and day whoud say peile and maybe peil ,please unblock me I will be more careful next time ,hope you a good dayI—DoRD (talk) 16:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. —DoRD (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.