User talk:TuomoS

This is TuomoS's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Passive autocatalytic recombiner has been accepted

Passive autocatalytic recombiner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 23:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fukushima

Thanks for the additional correction. I should have looked harder. Cheers! SkoreKeep (talk) 07:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland logo 2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland logo 2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Duolingo; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hipal (talk) 22:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal: I reverted your edit because you deleted an entire section before a consensus has been reached on the talk page. You have deleted the same section seven times during the last three weeks, and other users have always reinstated the text. Please continue discussion on the article talk page, collaborate with others, try to reach a consenus, rather than dropping warnings to other users' talk pages. The discussion on the article talk page would be more fruitful if you could explain your arguments in your own words, instead of flooding abbreviations. --TuomoS (talk) 06:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's edit-warring.

If you don't understand policy or references to policy, then ask specific questions for clarification. Otherwise it could look like you are trying to ignore policy.

Please continue...":That's why I've called you out for edit-warring. You know what to do, you tell others to do so, but you don't do it yourself.

If you've said all you want on the article talk page, then at least make that clear. Maybe suggest dispute resolution solutions that you think would help at this point.

I realize you're a very inexperienced editor, but you seem to know the basics enough that we shouldn't be here discussing this. --Hipal (talk) 17:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		Barnstar
		Thanks to your scrutiny and dogged efforts on the article Discharge of radioactive water of the Fukushima Plant, which improved the balance of the article. -- love.wh 16:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lovewhatyoudo: Thanks! --TuomoS (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fukushima seawall

Sure, "damaging reactors" may have been misleading. But does this excerpt from the next paragraph not imply that the seawall was breached?

the earthquake had also generated a tsunami 14 metres (46 ft) high that arrived shortly afterwards, swept over the plant's seawall and then flooded the lower parts of the reactor buildings at units 1–4.

Perhaps just a matter of wording? Curious to know what you think. Thanks! — PJsg1011 (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PJsg1011: The seawall was just 6 m above the sea level, while the ground level around the reactor buildings was 10 m above the sea level. The tsunami certainly swept over the seawall, but it is irrelevant whether it was breached or not. The seawall didn't play any role because it was much lower than the ground level. --TuomoS (talk) 06:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TuomoS: Ah I see, makes sense now! Thanks for the insight! —PJsg1011 (talk) 19:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: BWRX-300

Hello TuomoS! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as BWRX-300, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/OPG-applies-for-construction-licence-for-Darlingto, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:BWRX-300 and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, BWRX-300, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:BWRX-300. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:BWRX-300 with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:BWRX-300 saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Boud (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your accusation. I have not copied any content. I wrote a few words, not even a full sentence, using the same words as in the source. TuomoS (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Astravets Nuclear Power Plant Cost

You undid my changes, citing an increase in cost to US$24 billion. However, this claim is questionable as the cost in USD cannot increase due to the depreciation of the Ruble. Antora24 (talk) 08:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right that there was some confusion about the currency conversions in the earlier source. I have now added the latest cost estimate in rubles and converted to USD with the exchange rate at that time. --TuomoS (talk) 12:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The documents you cited says that Russia would lend up to $10 billion to cover 90% of the costs. I can't seem to find any info that shows the construction cost as $23 billion. I don't know if you know this but you cannot publish your own findings on wikipedia. I suggest you undo the changes you made Antora24 (talk) 18:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The document that I cited says: "In March 2015, Atomstroyexport admitted the plant would cost over 1,400 billion roubles compared to the forecast from 2014 of 840 billion Rubles." Then I converted this into US dollars, using the average exchange rate of 2015. This is not my own finding, it is the recommended procedure to convert lesser-known currencies to "more familiar currencies – such as the US dollar –– using an appropriate rate (which is often not the current exchange rate)." --TuomoS (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]