User talk:Tumbleweed44
April 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gene Ween—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gene Ween. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gene Ween, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gene Ween was changed by Tumbleweed44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.99151 on 2023-04-26T12:05:34+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- Noting for the record that I have changed this to a regular sockpuppetry block, not a CU block. To be clear, the CU evidence was consistent with the two accounts being operated by two separate people, but they were obviously coordinating which brings us into WP:MEAT territory, and likely WP:UPE as well. Girth Summit (blether) 10:31, 21 May 2023 (UTC)