User talk:Trpeters1

Speedy deletion nomination of Onarbor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Onarbor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Trpeters1 (talk) 15:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Onarbor

Hello, Trpeters1,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Onarbor should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onarbor .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Benboy00 (talk) 03:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Onarbor

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Onarbor, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllyD (talk) 09:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

If you copy a Wikipedia article, as one is free to do under CC-BY-SA, one must not forget the BY bit - there must be attribution to the source of the text. Second, please read WP:CORP about corporate notability, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources you need to give to prove it. A company that has not yet launched is unlikely to pass CORP. Also. you should not put future events in the past tense. Peridon (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim R Peterson

Hello Trpeters1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tim R Peterson for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 15:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Onarbor

Hello Trpeters1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Onarbor for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 15:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a moment to understand Wikipedia policies

Hi Tim.

We can understand you want to have an article on Wikipedia for your company.

But

Certain things are frowned upon, and we have guidelines see:

WP:PROMOTION, WP:COI.

Also, we have notability guidelines that state what a company needs to have to be notable. WP:NCORP - basically, has your company been covered by independent third party sources? If not, then we judge it isn't important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. This may change of course, but we have WP:TOOSOON for that. Barney the barney barney (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best not to keep the pages incubating for ever. WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, so we can't predict if and when something will become notable enough. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:11, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trpeters1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Trpeters1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Onarbor Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Onarbor Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted articles

Hi, I was reading another Talk Page and saw your question about your articles which have been deleted. You can ask an Admin to move the articles over to your "Sandbox" where you can continue to work on them. It would be like working on a draft and then you could try resubmitting it. The articles would be put at a page like User:Trpeters1/Sandbox1 and User:Trpeters1/Sandbox2. Then you could tinker away on it. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]