User talk:Troyol

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Troyol! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kpddg ^(talk) 14:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Younus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mohammed Younus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Worldbruce (talk) 22:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Worldbruce, it is under construction, I mentioned it in the top by using a template. Troyol (talk) 10:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mohammed Younus stood a high probability of being deleted in article space, under construction template notwithstanding, because he is almost certainly not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia as a stand alone topic). The Kaler Kantho piece is a press release from the bank, so is not independent. If you can add multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources, containing significant coverage of him, thus demonstrating that he is notable, please do so. Draft space gives you a minimum of six months, with minimal risk of deletion, to improve the draft to the point that it is ready for article space. If you reach a point where you think it's ready, submit it to get an expert opinion, or you may move it back to article space yourself. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Habibur Rahman (journalist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Habibur Rahman (journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habibur Rahman (journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ushwe Sing

Why my edit to Ushwe Sing was reverted? Dawnpenguin (talk) 10:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dawnpenguin, I've already mentioned the answer in your talk page. Your edit was not encyclopedic. If the person dies then it should be encyclopedic. Kindly see WP:PROPORTION. Troyol (talk) 10:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Dawnpenguin (talk) 10:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Troyol! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Userboxes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baba Baby O.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baba Baby O.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

B-bot, yeah, please delete it. A new poster has been released recently. Thanks. Troyol (talk) 08:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Cambria Math per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cambria Math. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:49, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]