User talk:TrinityCollegeLawReview
If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice instead. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 14:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
TrinityCollegeLawReview (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will create a new username but would like to carry over my edits please TrinityCollegeLawReview (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. Please use the template {{unblock-un}} to request unblock to change username. Your edits will automatically be linked to your new name.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TrinityCollegeLawReview (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
- Your edits do not seem to have been unduly promotional, but in principle we are always uneasy about anyone editing with a WP:Conflict of interest. Please read that guideline and WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest and confirm that (in regard to any edits to do with TCLR) you are willing to work by that standard. JohnCD (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)